Isadore Singer: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinsteināµ|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein") Ā |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930667078 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930667078 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=To @orzelc: in your life you'll see Paris and the Taj Mahal. Make sure you meet all the great minds. Go see [[Ed Witten|Ed]]. He's part human. | |content=To @orzelc: in your life you'll see Paris and the Taj Mahal. Make sure you meet all the great minds. Go see [[Ed Witten|Ed]]. He's part human. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2928337597 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2928337597 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=[[Ed Witten|Ed Witten]] has no Nobel Prize. Ā | |content=[[Ed Witten|Ed Witten]] has no Nobel Prize. Ā | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2929192939 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2929192939 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=So @orzelc asks me to unpack the No-Nobel/[[Ed Witten|Witten]] tweet.Ā It presupposes at least minor direct contact w/ [[Ed Witten|Ed]] so you don't doubt [[Ed Witten|Ed's]] gift. | |content=So @orzelc asks me to unpack the No-Nobel/[[Ed Witten|Witten]] tweet.Ā It presupposes at least minor direct contact w/ [[Ed Witten|Ed]] so you don't doubt [[Ed Witten|Ed's]] gift. | ||
|timestamp=12:31 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | |timestamp=12:31 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2929274636 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2929274636 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=So @orzelc the Quetion is: "Is thisĀ likely the first era of fundamental physics that could produce a 55+ [[Ed Witten|Witten]] nonlaureate?" | |content=So @orzelc the Quetion is: "Is thisĀ likely the first era of fundamental physics that could produce a 55+ [[Ed Witten|Witten]] nonlaureate?" | ||
|timestamp=12:38 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | |timestamp=12:38 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930347717 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930347717 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=My friend @orzelc asks: "do you consider Wheeler to be in [[Ed Witten|Witten's]] class?" Short answer is no. But I never went 1-1 with a young Wheeler. | |content=My friend @orzelc asks: "do you consider Wheeler to be in [[Ed Witten|Witten's]] class?" Short answer is no. But I never went 1-1 with a young Wheeler. | ||
|timestamp=1:57 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | |timestamp=1:57 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930448229 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930448229 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=In my whole life @orzelc, I have only had the pleasure to know one other person well who I regard as "in [[Ed Witten|Witten's]] class". [[Isadore Singer|Is Singer]]. | |content=In my whole life @orzelc, I have only had the pleasure to know one other person well who I regard as "in [[Ed Witten|Witten's]] class". [[Isadore Singer|Is Singer]]. | ||
|timestamp=2:03 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | |timestamp=2:03 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930581754 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2930581754 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=The nonphysicist disagrees w/ @orzelc. Wheeler lived through the whole build up of the [[Standard Model]]. [[Ed Witten|Ed]] would have pounced repeatedly. | |content=The nonphysicist disagrees w/ @orzelc. Wheeler lived through the whole build up of the [[Standard Model]]. [[Ed Witten|Ed]] would have pounced repeatedly. | ||
|timestamp=2:12 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | |timestamp=2:12 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2009 | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118990218 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118990218 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat. | |content=In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118385737 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118385737 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=There are three careers in modern physics of which I am envious. The other two are Yang and Dirac. In math: [[Isadore Singer|Singer]], [[Ed Witten|Witten]], Attiyah, [[Raoul Bott|Bott]]... | |content=There are three careers in modern physics of which I am envious. The other two are Yang and Dirac. In math: [[Isadore Singer|Singer]], [[Ed Witten|Witten]], Attiyah, [[Raoul Bott|Bott]]... | ||
|timestamp=5:05 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:05 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118560452 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118560452 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=And what about Jim Simons? Other than Chern Simons he did amazing stuff. Wu-Yang ...and that holonomy theorem of Berger was first rate. | |content=And what about Jim Simons? Other than Chern Simons he did amazing stuff. Wu-Yang ...and that holonomy theorem of Berger was first rate. | ||
|timestamp=5:18 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:18 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118623731 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118623731 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Anyone else appreciate that Jim Simons redoing Berger's list of holonomy groups to prove intrinsic sphere transitivity? An artist's theorem. | |content=Anyone else appreciate that Jim Simons redoing Berger's list of holonomy groups to prove intrinsic sphere transitivity? An artist's theorem. | ||
|timestamp=5:23 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:23 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118705638 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118705638 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Someone else I admire: [[Dan Freed]] at Austin. Dan never gets all the credit he deserves. Every paper nails some loose end for the community. | |content=Someone else I admire: [[Dan Freed]] at Austin. Dan never gets all the credit he deserves. Every paper nails some loose end for the community. | ||
|timestamp=5:29 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:29 AM Ā· Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5810665325 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5810665325 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Scientists' scientists: '''Isadore Singer''', giant of geometry and mathematical physics. | |content=Scientists' scientists: '''Isadore Singer''', giant of geometry and mathematical physics. | ||
Video: Ā | Video: Ā | ||
| Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286704645323202565 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286704645323202565 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Iām considering telling the story but Iāve never felt comfortable telling it in public. We oddly resent those who rescue us; Iāll never know if I could have done it alone. Knowing me, he essentially tricked me into accepting help to spare me the wound to my pride. A great man. š | |content=Iām considering telling the story but Iāve never felt comfortable telling it in public. We oddly resent those who rescue us; Iāll never know if I could have done it alone. Knowing me, he essentially tricked me into accepting help to spare me the wound to my pride. A great man. š | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286702407833890816 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286702407833890816 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Sometimes people take pride in being self taught. But in my case this is defensive. | |content=Sometimes people take pride in being self taught. But in my case this is defensive. | ||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286702409893294082 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286702409893294082 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=If you arenāt lucky enough to find a master, as Herbie says, who can lead you to your own voice, you need to be your own advisor and there are so many problems youāll have to overcome because you are always living in your own blind spot. | |content=If you arenāt lucky enough to find a master, as Herbie says, who can lead you to your own voice, you need to be your own advisor and there are so many problems youāll have to overcome because you are always living in your own blind spot. | ||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286704642873634817 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1286704642873634817 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=I donāt know that Iāve spoken publicly about it like this. So Iām trying it out. This is real Kung Fu Panda stuff. Ā | |content=I donāt know that Iāve spoken publicly about it like this. So Iām trying it out. This is real Kung Fu Panda stuff. Ā | ||
| Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1319102278587027456 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1319102278587027456 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Freeman Dyson</br> | |content=Freeman Dyson</br> | ||
[https://x.com/BrookeDallas @brookedallas]</br> | [https://x.com/BrookeDallas @brookedallas]</br> | ||
| Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1319098464530149376 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1319098464530149376 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Tom Lehrer</br> | |content=Tom Lehrer</br> | ||
Noam Elkies</br> | Noam Elkies</br> | ||
| Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362888790797295617 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362888790797295617 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=[Not to be crass: but I can usually tell within the 1st minute what is happening to the throttling of my tweets: this is not being widely seen. I'm trying to say something meaningful about a departed friend @jack. Could you please take a personal interest & stop the throttling?!] | |content=[Not to be crass: but I can usually tell within the 1st minute what is happening to the throttling of my tweets: this is not being widely seen. I'm trying to say something meaningful about a departed friend @jack. Could you please take a personal interest & stop the throttling?!] | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887553829859328 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887553829859328 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content='''Isadore Singer''' & [[Raoul Bott]] worked in almost exactly the same area. They collaborated with exactly the same people. They worked in adjacent zip codes (02138 vs 02139). They both had claims to the "greatest topological theorem" of the 20th century. | |content='''Isadore Singer''' & [[Raoul Bott]] worked in almost exactly the same area. They collaborated with exactly the same people. They worked in adjacent zip codes (02138 vs 02139). They both had claims to the "greatest topological theorem" of the 20th century. | ||
| Line 282: | Line 282: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887555356631041 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887555356631041 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=I've known only three minds personally who I'm convinced will be discussed 1000 years from now if humans survive: [[James Watson]], [[Raoul Bott]] and '''Isadore Singer''' (I met Atiyah & [[Ed Witten|Witten]] but did not know them). Ā | |content=I've known only three minds personally who I'm convinced will be discussed 1000 years from now if humans survive: [[James Watson]], [[Raoul Bott]] and '''Isadore Singer''' (I met Atiyah & [[Ed Witten|Witten]] but did not know them). Ā | ||
| Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887556233187330 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887556233187330 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Perhaps with both of these giants now gone it is time to tell my story. I'm not sure. I have never told it publicly in full. But they both are heroic men beyond being great minds. | |content=Perhaps with both of these giants now gone it is time to tell my story. I'm not sure. I have never told it publicly in full. But they both are heroic men beyond being great minds. | ||
| Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887560519819264 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887560519819264 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=They worked down the same street. I was at times a ping pong ball they sent back & forth between Building 2 at MIT & Harvard Science Center rm 508 (I think) along a 45 minute walk. I very much respected that they chose not to air any difficulties. They had respect for each other. | |content=They worked down the same street. I was at times a ping pong ball they sent back & forth between Building 2 at MIT & Harvard Science Center rm 508 (I think) along a 45 minute walk. I very much respected that they chose not to air any difficulties. They had respect for each other. | ||
|timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | |timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | ||
| Line 314: | Line 314: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887562214264834 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887562214264834 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=One reason I largely kept quiet about my story is respect for both men. They both defended and believed in the system. But, in part they believed in it BECAUSE they were so powerful that they could act as an underground railroad when that system failed: | |content=One reason I largely kept quiet about my story is respect for both men. They both defended and believed in the system. But, in part they believed in it BECAUSE they were so powerful that they could act as an underground railroad when that system failed: | ||
| Line 325: | Line 325: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887563254501377 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887563254501377 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=So, in part, I'm their collaboration. Raoul was not my advisor. He had no real idea what I was doing. But he was far more than that. Is was my shtarker. My ace in the hole. | |content=So, in part, I'm their collaboration. Raoul was not my advisor. He had no real idea what I was doing. But he was far more than that. Is was my shtarker. My ace in the hole. | ||
They worked as a team to help me; their failure to talk directly was the main clue I had of anything amiss. | They worked as a team to help me; their failure to talk directly was the main clue I had of anything amiss. | ||
| Line 335: | Line 335: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887564105973763 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887564105973763 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Lastly, there is the matter of my wedding. Is came to our event but I didn't invite Raoul. I did not understand what he had done for me. It is one of the biggest mistakes of my life. When the internet tries to insist to me that I am his student, I want to tell them what happend. | |content=Lastly, there is the matter of my wedding. Is came to our event but I didn't invite Raoul. I did not understand what he had done for me. It is one of the biggest mistakes of my life. When the internet tries to insist to me that I am his student, I want to tell them what happend. | ||
|timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | |timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | ||
| Line 344: | Line 344: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887565011943425 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887565011943425 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=The truth is that I would have been proud to be the student of [[Raoul Bott]]. I would have a storied lineage to claim. | |content=The truth is that I would have been proud to be the student of [[Raoul Bott]]. I would have a storied lineage to claim. | ||
| Line 355: | Line 355: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887565850734593 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887565850734593 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=In any event. I miss Is very much, but never expected to see him again. And I'm wrestling w the idea that I'm now free to tell my own story after 25yrs of saying very little in public. One of the reasons I don't take kindly to internet warfare is that I have large debts to pay. | |content=In any event. I miss Is very much, but never expected to see him again. And I'm wrestling w the idea that I'm now free to tell my own story after 25yrs of saying very little in public. One of the reasons I don't take kindly to internet warfare is that I have large debts to pay. | ||
|timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | |timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | ||
| Line 364: | Line 364: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887566702223363 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887566702223363 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=The more I subject myself to mindless politics, catfighting,Ā shadowbanning & trolling, the harder it is to fight for others/myself and to pay the debts to the giants who rescued me along my way. I don't know how I'd have done w/o them. Ā | |content=The more I subject myself to mindless politics, catfighting,Ā shadowbanning & trolling, the harder it is to fight for others/myself and to pay the debts to the giants who rescued me along my way. I don't know how I'd have done w/o them. Ā | ||
| Line 375: | Line 375: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887567536910336 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887567536910336 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Lastly, I used to have a relationship to a very different @nytimes. Thus when I read Is' obituarty I was shocked to see @julierehmeyer's beautiful tribute including my own quotes on Is. It made me sad to think about how much has been lost. Sadly, those quotes came from long ago. | |content=Lastly, I used to have a relationship to a very different @nytimes. Thus when I read Is' obituarty I was shocked to see @julierehmeyer's beautiful tribute including my own quotes on Is. It made me sad to think about how much has been lost. Sadly, those quotes came from long ago. | ||
|timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | |timestamp=10:11 PM Ā· Feb 19, 2021 | ||
| Line 384: | Line 384: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887568459587588 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1362887568459587588 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=If you haven't read her piece, I think it is quite moving even though it is no more than a sketch. End. | |content=If you haven't read her piece, I think it is quite moving even though it is no more than a sketch. End. | ||
| Line 400: | Line 400: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131507686363138 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131507686363138 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Discontinuous innovation is always unlikely. But never impossible. | |content=Discontinuous innovation is always unlikely. But never impossible. | ||
| Line 416: | Line 416: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131487692115972 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131487692115972 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Dear @michaelshermer, | |content=Dear @michaelshermer, | ||
| Line 439: | Line 439: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131494289760259 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131494289760259 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=First of all, I am concerned that the paradigm of being scientifically or technologically ācenturies aheadā is all wrong. This came up in a phone call with our buddy @SamHarrisOrg. | |content=First of all, I am concerned that the paradigm of being scientifically or technologically ācenturies aheadā is all wrong. This came up in a phone call with our buddy @SamHarrisOrg. | ||
| Line 452: | Line 452: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131496059805698 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131496059805698 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Next challenge: doesnāt your line of reasoning prove that āRenaissance Technologiesā is either a fraud or a front? Their Medallion Fund is otherwise a long term unbreached secret, discontinuous from any other know investment fund seemingly thousands of years ahead of competitors. | |content=Next challenge: doesnāt your line of reasoning prove that āRenaissance Technologiesā is either a fraud or a front? Their Medallion Fund is otherwise a long term unbreached secret, discontinuous from any other know investment fund seemingly thousands of years ahead of competitors. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 461: | Line 461: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131496844165120 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131496844165120 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Now Iāve had the odd question about Renaissance (front not fraud) for just this reason. But either way, itās either a counter example to your claims on discontinuous innovation if it is merely a fund or a counter-example to your secrecy claims if it is our secret physics program. | |content=Now Iāve had the odd question about Renaissance (front not fraud) for just this reason. But either way, itās either a counter example to your claims on discontinuous innovation if it is merely a fund or a counter-example to your secrecy claims if it is our secret physics program. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 470: | Line 470: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131497641082880 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131497641082880 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Next: there are really two metrics on innovations. | |content=Next: there are really two metrics on innovations. | ||
| Line 485: | Line 485: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131498391871490 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131498391871490 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=You are, to me, arguing powerfully that certain people canāt exist: Rodney Mullen, Edward Van Halen, Bob Beamon, Dick Fosbury, Hiroji Satoh, Satoshi Nakamoto, etc. | |content=You are, to me, arguing powerfully that certain people canāt exist: Rodney Mullen, Edward Van Halen, Bob Beamon, Dick Fosbury, Hiroji Satoh, Satoshi Nakamoto, etc. | ||
| Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131499197157376 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131499197157376 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=And that brings us to theoretical physics. Beginning around 1982 , the son of the worldās top employed anti-gravity researcher(?!) of the 1950s turned in what may be the most impressive 15yr output in the history of the subject by my estimation. How can I begin to explain this? | |content=And that brings us to theoretical physics. Beginning around 1982 , the son of the worldās top employed anti-gravity researcher(?!) of the 1950s turned in what may be the most impressive 15yr output in the history of the subject by my estimation. How can I begin to explain this? | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 505: | Line 505: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131499977318403 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131499977318403 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Itās not physics exactly. But Edward Witten w support from a small number of folks rewrote [[Quantum Field Theory]] as geometry. If Einstein geometrized gravity, then [[Ed Witten|Witten]] geometrized Quantum Field theory (everything else). | |content=Itās not physics exactly. But Edward Witten w support from a small number of folks rewrote [[Quantum Field Theory]] as geometry. If Einstein geometrized gravity, then [[Ed Witten|Witten]] geometrized Quantum Field theory (everything else). | ||
| Line 516: | Line 516: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131500753182720 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131500753182720 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=But itās not that nothing happened in physics. While we were pretending that string theory was working, [[Ed Witten|Witten]] & Co revolutionized our mathematical framework. Think of it as an enormous amount of unrealized gains. Pent up genius & power looking for its 1st application to the š. | |content=But itās not that nothing happened in physics. While we were pretending that string theory was working, [[Ed Witten|Witten]] & Co revolutionized our mathematical framework. Think of it as an enormous amount of unrealized gains. Pent up genius & power looking for its 1st application to the š. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 525: | Line 525: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131501512433665 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131501512433665 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=If you gave us [[Ed Witten|E Witten]], [[Jim Simons|J Simons]], [[Isadore Singer|I Singer]], [[CN Yang]], M Atiyah, D Quillen & G Segal, in a quiet program in 1975, I could argue that they didnāt need much more. In fact you donāt need all 7 but for the sake of argument I can make the case using this. But Witten is the main engine. | |content=If you gave us [[Ed Witten|E Witten]], [[Jim Simons|J Simons]], [[Isadore Singer|I Singer]], [[CN Yang]], M Atiyah, D Quillen & G Segal, in a quiet program in 1975, I could argue that they didnāt need much more. In fact you donāt need all 7 but for the sake of argument I can make the case using this. But Witten is the main engine. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 534: | Line 534: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131502275776512 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131502275776512 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Now let me show you how I could get discontinuous innovation if I were China or Russia. I donāt know those systems as well so Iāll use the US example. | |content=Now let me show you how I could get discontinuous innovation if I were China or Russia. I donāt know those systems as well so Iāll use the US example. | ||
| Line 545: | Line 545: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131503064289281 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131503064289281 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=If I thought like CCP, Iād create a lavish secret theoretical physics program modeled on the Russian Sharashka system. The key would be to get it to look like something else. A boring Tech company or some weird Chinese fund to disguise the reason for the secretive lavish campus. | |content=If I thought like CCP, Iād create a lavish secret theoretical physics program modeled on the Russian Sharashka system. The key would be to get it to look like something else. A boring Tech company or some weird Chinese fund to disguise the reason for the secretive lavish campus. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 554: | Line 554: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131503827685378 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131503827685378 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=[Digression: If the US were smarter, weād do it by setting up a mythic secret $B hedge fund that employs top differential geometers, theoretical physicists & ML experts by a national lab & an off brand university w/ inexplicably strong geometry & physics. But enough crazy talk..] | |content=[Digression: If the US were smarter, weād do it by setting up a mythic secret $B hedge fund that employs top differential geometers, theoretical physicists & ML experts by a national lab & an off brand university w/ inexplicably strong geometry & physics. But enough crazy talk..] | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 563: | Line 563: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131504586838016 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131504586838016 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=If CCP could today repeat what Witten (& friends) did building off Geometric Quantum Field Thy, the US would have Zero clue what it unlocks. Even by your own incrementalist theory. It might unlock absolutely nothing. Or passage to the stars via additional degrees of freedom. š¤·āāļø | |content=If CCP could today repeat what Witten (& friends) did building off Geometric Quantum Field Thy, the US would have Zero clue what it unlocks. Even by your own incrementalist theory. It might unlock absolutely nothing. Or passage to the stars via additional degrees of freedom. š¤·āāļø | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 572: | Line 572: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131505350201345 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131505350201345 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=One last point. I released such a theory. Could well be wrong. | |content=One last point. I released such a theory. Could well be wrong. | ||
| Line 583: | Line 583: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131506121961473 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131506121961473 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=You donāt have to take a position on me or GU. You can ask Wolfram or Lisi or Barbour or Deutsche or anyone outside the system whether such calls are placed. They are not. No one *in* the system believes in wild discontinuous change from *outside* the system. As per your article. | |content=You donāt have to take a position on me or GU. You can ask Wolfram or Lisi or Barbour or Deutsche or anyone outside the system whether such calls are placed. They are not. No one *in* the system believes in wild discontinuous change from *outside* the system. As per your article. | ||
|timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | |timestamp=5:40 PM Ā· Jun 13, 2021 | ||
| Line 592: | Line 592: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131506876928003 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1404131506876928003 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Which is to say weāre not monitoring. Maybe we think thatās a waste of taxpayer dollars. Maybe we think that a Grisha Perelman of physics is impossible. | |content=Which is to say weāre not monitoring. Maybe we think thatās a waste of taxpayer dollars. Maybe we think that a Grisha Perelman of physics is impossible. | ||
| Line 607: | Line 607: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474262756308119555 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474262756308119555 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Said differently Iāve been bullish on positive externalities of mathematical physics. But a lot of great math that got done isnāt [[String Theory|string theory]]. Itās claimed to be stringy but it is really mostly mathematical physics or geometric field theory that is claimed by string theorists. | |content=Said differently Iāve been bullish on positive externalities of mathematical physics. But a lot of great math that got done isnāt [[String Theory|string theory]]. Itās claimed to be stringy but it is really mostly mathematical physics or geometric field theory that is claimed by string theorists. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 615: | Line 615: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1473817405809778689 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1473817405809778689 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Things got hard. They didnāt get hopeless. | |content=Things got hard. They didnāt get hopeless. | ||
| Line 663: | Line 663: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474213317568651264 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474213317568651264 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=We may disagree intellectually more than I thought. This is Jackiwās point: the era of physics thinking of mathematics as advanced calculus (analysis) wasnāt fruitful. | |content=We may disagree intellectually more than I thought. This is Jackiwās point: the era of physics thinking of mathematics as advanced calculus (analysis) wasnāt fruitful. | ||
| Line 685: | Line 685: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474261469462073344 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474261469462073344 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=[[Quantum Field Theory|QFT]] & cross-sections sound more like particle theory than Astrophysics, Cosmology or even [[General Relativity|GR]]. | |content=[[Quantum Field Theory|QFT]] & cross-sections sound more like particle theory than Astrophysics, Cosmology or even [[General Relativity|GR]]. | ||
| Line 697: | Line 697: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474261875328098308 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1474261875328098308 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=There are a lot of string theorists who have done things that really matter to geometry, topology, analysis on manifolds, representation theory. And I donāt want to misunderstand your point. | |content=There are a lot of string theorists who have done things that really matter to geometry, topology, analysis on manifolds, representation theory. And I donāt want to misunderstand your point. | ||
|timestamp=6:13 AM Ā· Dec 24, 2021 | |timestamp=6:13 AM Ā· Dec 24, 2021 | ||
| Line 711: | Line 711: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989612740046905377 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989612740046905377 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Itās as if we, the U.S., hate being the worlds premier homegrown scientific community. All it takes is reversing self inflicted damage. Thatās it. Thatās all. | |content=Itās as if we, the U.S., hate being the worlds premier homegrown scientific community. All it takes is reversing self inflicted damage. Thatās it. Thatās all. | ||
| Line 723: | Line 723: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989608579163460068 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989608579163460068 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Yes. Iām saying that the [[Jim Simons]], [[Richard Feynman]], [[Jim Watson]], [[Steven Weinberg]], [[Sidney Coleman]], [[Ken Arrow]], [[Linus Pauling]], [[Isadore Singer]], [[Joshua Lederberg]], [[Steve Smale]], [[Paul Samuelson]], [[Mark Ptashne]], [[John Milnor]], model of homegrown American scientific genius is being destroyed. | |content=Yes. Iām saying that the [[Jim Simons]], [[Richard Feynman]], [[Jim Watson]], [[Steven Weinberg]], [[Sidney Coleman]], [[Ken Arrow]], [[Linus Pauling]], [[Isadore Singer]], [[Joshua Lederberg]], [[Steve Smale]], [[Paul Samuelson]], [[Mark Ptashne]], [[John Milnor]], model of homegrown American scientific genius is being destroyed. | ||
|timestamp=8:17 AM Ā· Nov 15, 2025 | |timestamp=8:17 AM Ā· Nov 15, 2025 | ||
| Line 732: | Line 732: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989608581470327007 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989608581470327007 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Is anyone concerned about this? It sure doesnāt seem it. | |content=Is anyone concerned about this? It sure doesnāt seem it. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:25, 5 May 2026
On X[edit]
2009[edit]
Ed Witten has no Nobel Prize.
Now tell me again how this era's physics just feels different because we are too close to it.
So @orzelc the Quetion is: "Is this likely the first era of fundamental physics that could produce a 55+ Witten nonlaureate?"
My friend @orzelc asks: "do you consider Wheeler to be in Witten's class?" Short answer is no. But I never went 1-1 with a young Wheeler.
The nonphysicist disagrees w/ @orzelc. Wheeler lived through the whole build up of the Standard Model. Ed would have pounced repeatedly.
To @orzelc: in your life you'll see Paris and the Taj Mahal. Make sure you meet all the great minds. Go see Ed. He's part human.
And what about Jim Simons? Other than Chern Simons he did amazing stuff. Wu-Yang ...and that holonomy theorem of Berger was first rate.
Anyone else appreciate that Jim Simons redoing Berger's list of holonomy groups to prove intrinsic sphere transitivity? An artist's theorem.
Someone else I admire: Dan Freed at Austin. Dan never gets all the credit he deserves. Every paper nails some loose end for the community.
In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat.
Scientists' scientists: Isadore Singer, giant of geometry and mathematical physics. Video:
2020[edit]
Sometimes people take pride in being self taught. But in my case this is defensive.
I would have been honored to have been a part of a chain. I just never found my mentor in time. Isadore Singer should have been my advisor.
Here is Herbie on Miles Davis:
If you arenāt lucky enough to find a master, as Herbie says, who can lead you to your own voice, you need to be your own advisor and there are so many problems youāll have to overcome because you are always living in your own blind spot.
Itās an inferior road. But itās possible.
I donāt know that Iāve spoken publicly about it like this. So Iām trying it out. This is real Kung Fu Panda stuff.
It bothers me that Raoul Bott is listed as my supervisor on my Wikipedia entry. He wasnāt.
What he was, was my hero who rescued me. A far more impressive role.
Iām considering telling the story but Iāve never felt comfortable telling it in public. We oddly resent those who rescue us; Iāll never know if I could have done it alone. Knowing me, he essentially tricked me into accepting help to spare me the wound to my pride. A great man. š
Tom Lehrer
Noam Elkies
@LauraDeming
@MarcusduSautoy
@patrickc
@lishali88
@peterthiel
@thegoodtomchi*
@SamHarrisOrg
@joerogan
@tylercowen
@MsMelChen
James Simons
Jared Diamond
@StephenAtHome
@tferriss
@FutureJurvetson
@naval
Jimmy Kaltreider
@mkonnikova
@pmarca
Etc...
[no family]
Who's the most knowledgeable person you can think of? Think of "knowledgeable" as 2D space: it factors in both horizontal breadth across a wide range of topics and vertical depth within those topics. Who are some people whose knowledge covers an extraordinary amount of 2D space?
Freeman Dyson
@brookedallas
Sydney Coleman
@adamgazz
@balajis
@stephstem
Kevin Harrington
Jordan Greenhall
Daniel Schmachtenberger
@nntaleb
@annakhachiyan
@seanonolennon
@DavidYezzi
Raoul Bott
@DouglasKMurray
@jordanbpeterson
Isadore Singer
R Gomory
R Feynman
And on & on & on...
2021[edit]
Isadore Singer & Raoul Bott worked in almost exactly the same area. They collaborated with exactly the same people. They worked in adjacent zip codes (02138 vs 02139). They both had claims to the "greatest topological theorem" of the 20th century.
They never co-authored a paper.
I've known only three minds personally who I'm convinced will be discussed 1000 years from now if humans survive: James Watson, Raoul Bott and Isadore Singer (I met Atiyah & Witten but did not know them).
Is & Raoul however both collaborated on my rescue in Graduate school.
Perhaps with both of these giants now gone it is time to tell my story. I'm not sure. I have never told it publicly in full. But they both are heroic men beyond being great minds.
Had they surmounted their personal difficulties their collaborations could have changed the world.
They worked down the same street. I was at times a ping pong ball they sent back & forth between Building 2 at MIT & Harvard Science Center rm 508 (I think) along a 45 minute walk. I very much respected that they chose not to air any difficulties. They had respect for each other.
One reason I largely kept quiet about my story is respect for both men. They both defended and believed in the system. But, in part they believed in it BECAUSE they were so powerful that they could act as an underground railroad when that system failed:
So, in part, I'm their collaboration. Raoul was not my advisor. He had no real idea what I was doing. But he was far more than that. Is was my shtarker. My ace in the hole. They worked as a team to help me; their failure to talk directly was the main clue I had of anything amiss.
Lastly, there is the matter of my wedding. Is came to our event but I didn't invite Raoul. I did not understand what he had done for me. It is one of the biggest mistakes of my life. When the internet tries to insist to me that I am his student, I want to tell them what happend.
The truth is that I would have been proud to be the student of Raoul Bott. I would have a storied lineage to claim.
The truth is Raoul gave me his name for a self-advised thesis. And like a fool I resented it. Yet how much greater is the man who lends his last name to a Bastard.
In any event. I miss Is very much, but never expected to see him again. And I'm wrestling w the idea that I'm now free to tell my own story after 25yrs of saying very little in public. One of the reasons I don't take kindly to internet warfare is that I have large debts to pay.
The more I subject myself to mindless politics, catfighting, shadowbanning & trolling, the harder it is to fight for others/myself and to pay the debts to the giants who rescued me along my way. I don't know how I'd have done w/o them.
But I needed to grow this voice to do it.
Lastly, I used to have a relationship to a very different @nytimes. Thus when I read Is' obituarty I was shocked to see @julierehmeyer's beautiful tribute including my own quotes on Is. It made me sad to think about how much has been lost. Sadly, those quotes came from long ago.
If you haven't read her piece, I think it is quite moving even though it is no more than a sketch. End.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/science/isadore-singer-dead.html
[Not to be crass: but I can usually tell within the 1st minute what is happening to the throttling of my tweets: this is not being widely seen. I'm trying to say something meaningful about a departed friend @jack. Could you please take a personal interest & stop the throttling?!]
Dear @michaelshermer,
Thanks for this. Very sober. I myself also donāt find the authenticated videos so far released compelling. But I do find your challenge of āno isolated discontinuous innovationā quite interesting!
Might I propose a friendly debate among friendly skeptics?
Dear @EricRWeinstein Please see my argument for why UAPs cannot be foreign assets capable of physics & aerodynamics attributed to UAPs that if true would be decades or centuries ahead of us. History shows no nations/companies of comp development so lag. https://quillette.com/2021/06/03/understanding-the-unidentified/
First of all, I am concerned that the paradigm of being scientifically or technologically ācenturies aheadā is all wrong. This came up in a phone call with our buddy @SamHarrisOrg.
Q: How many centuries ahead is 1952-3 from 1900? Iād have guessed āmanyā (not .5) and been wrong.
Next challenge: doesnāt your line of reasoning prove that āRenaissance Technologiesā is either a fraud or a front? Their Medallion Fund is otherwise a long term unbreached secret, discontinuous from any other know investment fund seemingly thousands of years ahead of competitors.
Now Iāve had the odd question about Renaissance (front not fraud) for just this reason. But either way, itās either a counter example to your claims on discontinuous innovation if it is merely a fund or a counter-example to your secrecy claims if it is our secret physics program.
Next: there are really two metrics on innovations.
Metric I: How big the incremental jump in difficulty.
Metric II: How big the jump in what is unlocked.
The great fear is that a small jump measured by 1 leading to an ENORMOUS jump in as measured by II.
You are, to me, arguing powerfully that certain people canāt exist: Rodney Mullen, Edward Van Halen, Bob Beamon, Dick Fosbury, Hiroji Satoh, Satoshi Nakamoto, etc.
They all exhibited the āa little unlocks a lotā paradigm with Zero-Day exploits that were each decisive.
And that brings us to theoretical physics. Beginning around 1982 , the son of the worldās top employed anti-gravity researcher(?!) of the 1950s turned in what may be the most impressive 15yr output in the history of the subject by my estimation. How can I begin to explain this?
Itās not physics exactly. But Edward Witten w support from a small number of folks rewrote Quantum Field Theory as geometry. If Einstein geometrized gravity, then Witten geometrized Quantum Field theory (everything else).
Now, all that change has so far unlocked exactly nothing.
But itās not that nothing happened in physics. While we were pretending that string theory was working, Witten & Co revolutionized our mathematical framework. Think of it as an enormous amount of unrealized gains. Pent up genius & power looking for its 1st application to the š.
Now let me show you how I could get discontinuous innovation if I were China or Russia. I donāt know those systems as well so Iāll use the US example.
We know most of the top minds. We pretend that there is a lot of subjectivity about this for social reasons but China wouldnāt.
If I thought like CCP, Iād create a lavish secret theoretical physics program modeled on the Russian Sharashka system. The key would be to get it to look like something else. A boring Tech company or some weird Chinese fund to disguise the reason for the secretive lavish campus.
[Digression: If the US were smarter, weād do it by setting up a mythic secret $B hedge fund that employs top differential geometers, theoretical physicists & ML experts by a national lab & an off brand university w/ inexplicably strong geometry & physics. But enough crazy talk..]
If CCP could today repeat what Witten (& friends) did building off Geometric Quantum Field Thy, the US would have Zero clue what it unlocks. Even by your own incrementalist theory. It might unlock absolutely nothing. Or passage to the stars via additional degrees of freedom. š¤·āāļø
One last point. I released such a theory. Could well be wrong.
But I can tell you I should have received a call from DOE. Because calls are cheap and relevant trained PhDs are *very* finite. The US should track every geometer, General Relativist, and Particle Theorist working.
You donāt have to take a position on me or GU. You can ask Wolfram or Lisi or Barbour or Deutsche or anyone outside the system whether such calls are placed. They are not. No one *in* the system believes in wild discontinuous change from *outside* the system. As per your article.
Which is to say weāre not monitoring. Maybe we think thatās a waste of taxpayer dollars. Maybe we think that a Grisha Perelman of physics is impossible.
How much does a phone call cost if a researcher is wrong vs not bothering if theyāre right? Price the Type I & II error. Nuts.
Discontinuous innovation is always unlikely. But never impossible.
We are both skeptics. But this UFO story is weird beyond belief Michael. I canāt think of a single story to fit to these reports Iām hearing about.
I welcome your thoughts. As always.
Warm regards,
Eric
Things got hard. They didnāt get hopeless.
Yes we spent almost 40 years lying about string theory. But we could stop today. We could have the leaders in the field admit they made a *colossal* bad bet & ask āWhat did we dispose of while we were wildly over-hyping string theory?ā
Its increasingly apparent to me that the next physics breakthrough is gonna be from #ai . Its humanly not possible anymore for theoretical physicists ..i was feeling it even around 2010
They can't stop, Eric. They're making a living from writing papers about things no one will ever see. It's a systemic problem that requires a systemic response. And the first step would be to admit they have a problem (which they don't).
Seems likely a lot of the math they developed will wind up handy, but it's a long time to wait for dessert.
Most of what physicists call math is totally uninteresting even for mathematicians. It's just advanced calculus. Look here is my qft and when I crunch it cross-sections fall out.
We may disagree intellectually more than I thought. This is Jackiwās point: the era of physics thinking of mathematics as advanced calculus (analysis) wasnāt fruitful.
That changed around 1975 when the quantum began to discover geometry.
Iām honestly confused. What do you mean?
We are talking past each other. I am referring to particle physicists/astrophysicists/cosmologists who crunch out shallow and useless papers in the thousands. There's no interesting math in those. You're talking about something else entirely.
There are a lot of string theorists who have done things that really matter to geometry, topology, analysis on manifolds, representation theory. And I donāt want to misunderstand your point.
Said differently Iāve been bullish on positive externalities of mathematical physics. But a lot of great math that got done isnāt string theory. Itās claimed to be stringy but it is really mostly mathematical physics or geometric field theory that is claimed by string theorists.
2025[edit]
Yes. Iām saying that the Jim Simons, Richard Feynman, Jim Watson, Steven Weinberg, Sidney Coleman, Ken Arrow, Linus Pauling, Isadore Singer, Joshua Lederberg, Steve Smale, Paul Samuelson, Mark Ptashne, John Milnor, model of homegrown American scientific genius is being destroyed.
Is anyone concerned about this? It sure doesnāt seem it.
Science needs academic freedom. It needs resources. It needs independence.
Fauci and Collins would have been impossible if we were healthy.
It is not safe to make scientists into mere employees.
Itās way too dangerous.
Itās as if we, the U.S., hate being the worlds premier homegrown scientific community. All it takes is reversing self inflicted damage. Thatās it. Thatās all.
We seem to hate our own scientists.
It makes no sense. At least to me.
Related Pages[edit]
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.