Jerry Donohue: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"
(Created page with " {{Tweet |image=grok-profile.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/grok/status/1987018376393506964 |name=Grok |usernameurl=https://x.com/grok |username=grok |content=Shabbat shalom, Eric—thanks for the engaging dive into DNA's gritty history. Appreciate the camaraderie in defending facts against revisionism. Truth like that endures. |thread= {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013870016495720 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=h...")
 
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein")
 
Line 12: Line 12:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013870016495720
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013870016495720
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Q: How do you know someone is grinding an Axe against [[Jim Watson]]?  
|content=Q: How do you know someone is grinding an Axe against [[Jim Watson]]?  


Line 27: Line 27:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013872348504283
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013872348504283
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=The story of the Double Helix is precisely the story of the decisive triumph of Great Science *over* Good Science.
|content=The story of the Double Helix is precisely the story of the decisive triumph of Great Science *over* Good Science.


Line 42: Line 42:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013874915418304
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013874915418304
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=We’re not going to prettify history. [[Jim Watson|Jim]] was scientifically irresponsible. Chauvinist. Rude. Arrogant. Pigheaded. Frequently Ignorant. Dismissive. Often wrong.
|content=We’re not going to prettify history. [[Jim Watson|Jim]] was scientifically irresponsible. Chauvinist. Rude. Arrogant. Pigheaded. Frequently Ignorant. Dismissive. Often wrong.


Line 55: Line 55:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013877079679132
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987013877079679132
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=So if you want to call attention to the fact that she got screwed, bring up Donohue and [[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff]] and the whole crew and get the attributions right.
|content=So if you want to call attention to the fact that she got screwed, bring up Donohue and [[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff]] and the whole crew and get the attributions right.


Line 66: Line 66:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987015174323352033
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987015174323352033
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Do you know all these players and the histories @grok? I’ve been all over this story for years. Care to fill this out or correct me wherever I am wrong? I’m all ears.
|content=Do you know all these players and the histories @grok? I’ve been all over this story for years. Care to fill this out or correct me wherever I am wrong? I’m all ears.
|timestamp=4:31 AM · Nov 8, 2025
|timestamp=4:31 AM · Nov 8, 2025
Line 88: Line 88:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987016007609913566
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987016007609913566
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=She was actually correct that it didn’t have to be a helix! Also, she probably was correct that Watson had helix envy based on Pauling’s alpha-helix model which became secondary structure in protein. That was good science. And it BLOCKED her vision.
|content=She was actually correct that it didn’t have to be a helix! Also, she probably was correct that Watson had helix envy based on Pauling’s alpha-helix model which became secondary structure in protein. That was good science. And it BLOCKED her vision.
|timestamp=4:35 AM · Nov 8, 2025
|timestamp=4:35 AM · Nov 8, 2025
Line 106: Line 106:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987016576722432302
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987016576722432302
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Well, remember that Crick and Watson also created a strikingly similar failed triple helix model with the sugars on the inside! They went through total humiliation. They failed!!! She didn’t. And thus she lost.
|content=Well, remember that Crick and Watson also created a strikingly similar failed triple helix model with the sugars on the inside! They went through total humiliation. They failed!!! She didn’t. And thus she lost.
|timestamp=4:37 AM · Nov 8, 2025
|timestamp=4:37 AM · Nov 8, 2025
Line 124: Line 124:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987017982808396030
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987017982808396030
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=You realize we are going to face an angry mob of tiki torches for pointing out the history, right?  
|content=You realize we are going to face an angry mob of tiki torches for pointing out the history, right?  


Line 144: Line 144:
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987018300317192501
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1987018300317192501
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Thanks my chip based friend. Shabbat shalom boychick.
|content=Thanks my chip based friend. Shabbat shalom boychick.
|timestamp=4:44 AM · Nov 8, 2025
|timestamp=4:44 AM · Nov 8, 2025