Dan Freed: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118990218 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein |username=EricRWeinstein |content=In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat. |thread= {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118385737 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=https://x.com/E...") Â |
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein")  |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118990218 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118990218 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat. | |content=In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118385737 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118385737 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=There are three careers in modern physics of which I am envious. The other two are Yang and Dirac. In math: [[Isadore Singer|Singer]], [[Ed Witten|Witten]], Attiyah, [[Raoul Bott|Bott]]... | |content=There are three careers in modern physics of which I am envious. The other two are Yang and Dirac. In math: [[Isadore Singer|Singer]], [[Ed Witten|Witten]], Attiyah, [[Raoul Bott|Bott]]... | ||
|timestamp=5:05 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:05 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118560452 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118560452 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=And what about Jim Simons? Other than Chern Simons he did amazing stuff. Wu-Yang ...and that holonomy theorem of Berger was first rate. | |content=And what about Jim Simons? Other than Chern Simons he did amazing stuff. Wu-Yang ...and that holonomy theorem of Berger was first rate. | ||
|timestamp=5:18 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:18 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118623731 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118623731 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Anyone else appreciate that Jim Simons redoing Berger's list of holonomy groups to prove intrinsic sphere transitivity? An artist's theorem. | |content=Anyone else appreciate that [[Jim Simons]] redoing Berger's list of holonomy groups to prove intrinsic sphere transitivity? An artist's theorem. | ||
|timestamp=5:23 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:23 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118705638 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4118705638 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Someone else I admire: [[Dan Freed]] at Austin. Dan never gets all the credit he deserves. Every paper nails some loose end for the community. | |content=Someone else I admire: [[Dan Freed]] at Austin. Dan never gets all the credit he deserves. Every paper nails some loose end for the community. | ||
|timestamp=5:29 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | |timestamp=5:29 AM · Sep 20, 2009 | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
* [[Ed Witten]] | * [[Ed Witten]] | ||
* [[Isadore Singer]] | * [[Isadore Singer]] | ||
* [[Jim Simons]] | |||
* [[Raoul Bott]] | * [[Raoul Bott]] | ||
[[Category:Mathematics]] | |||
[[Category:People]] | |||
[[Category:Physics]] | |||
[[Category:Portal Topics]] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:22, 5 May 2026
And what about Jim Simons? Other than Chern Simons he did amazing stuff. Wu-Yang ...and that holonomy theorem of Berger was first rate.
Anyone else appreciate that Jim Simons redoing Berger's list of holonomy groups to prove intrinsic sphere transitivity? An artist's theorem.
Someone else I admire: Dan Freed at Austin. Dan never gets all the credit he deserves. Every paper nails some loose end for the community.
In Econ. Krugman is the master chef who can start with deadly pufferfish and dependably prepare elegant fugu thats safe to eat.