Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game: Difference between revisions
(→On X) |
(→On X) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==On X== | ==On X== | ||
=== 2017 === | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/ | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/831358941225365504 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=' | |content=[[Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game|"Can't anybody here play this game?"]] | ||
-Casey Stengel (1890-1975) | |||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image= | |image=CNN-profile.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/ | |nameurl=https://x.com/cnn/status/831355310635937793 | ||
|name= | |name=CNN | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/cnn | ||
|username= | |username=CNN | ||
|content= | |content=JUST IN: Michael Flynn has resigned as President Trump's national security adviser, two sources tell CNN. http://snpy.tv/2lebEto | ||
|timestamp=3:12 AM · Feb 14, 2017 | |||
|timestamp= | |||
}} | }} | ||
|timestamp= | |timestamp=4:26 AM · Feb 14, 2017 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== 2020 === | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 86: | Line 85: | ||
In the immortal words of Casey Stengel: | In the immortal words of Casey Stengel: | ||
[[Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game|“Can’t ANYBODY here play this game??”]] | |||
|timestamp=8:34 AM · Apr 22, 2020 | |timestamp=8:34 AM · Apr 22, 2020 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 92: | Line 91: | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== 2022 === | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/ | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1529993749832404993 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=''' | |content='''“Can’t anybody here play this game?”''' | ||
-Casey Stengel | |||
- | I don’t know what to say. What does one say to this? Are there any toxically masculine men available? With…like…testicles? | ||
Maybe this is it. We may need actual men. Manly, smelly, glory-seeking, rugged, individualistic men. | |||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image= | |image=Mediaite-profile.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/ | |nameurl=https://x.com/Mediaite/status/1529969734048878592 | ||
|name= | |name=Mediaite | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/Mediaite | ||
|username= | |username=Mediaite | ||
|content= | |content=Texas Police Lieutenant Says Cops Were Reluctant to Engage Gunman Because ‘They Could’ve Been Shot’ | ||
|timestamp= | https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/texas-police-lieutenant-says-cops-were-reluctant-to-engage-gunman-because-they-couldve-been-shot/ | ||
|timestamp=11:36 PM · May 26, 2022 | |||
}} | }} | ||
|timestamp= | |timestamp=1:11 AM · May 27, 2022 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== 2023 === | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/ | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1618348209059004417 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content= | |content=Wouldn't a scientist ask the question: | ||
"What if it is the leadership?" | |||
Wouldn't that be a logical scientific question? Wouldn't that be a testable hypothesis? Why can't we ask that question as scientists? Why is that hypothesis excluded after *50* yrs? | |||
[End Of Heresy] | |||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 132: | Line 141: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Discussion of the future of theoretical physics seems like a game of "Intellectual Keepaway." | |content=Discussion of the future of theoretical physics seems like a game of [[Intellectual Keep-Away|"Intellectual Keepaway."]] | ||
Its the same group of mandarins who predicted LHC SuperSymmetry, Mini-Black holes, SU(5) Grand Unification, String Theory, Q-Gravity would work. | Its the same group of mandarins who predicted LHC SuperSymmetry, Mini-Black holes, SU(5) Grand Unification, [[String Theory]], [[Quantum Gravity|Q-Gravity]] would work. | ||
What do our *heretics* say instead? | What do our *heretics* say instead? | ||
| Line 159: | Line 168: | ||
Here goes. What if the problem is our leadership. What if we asked | Here goes. What if the problem is our leadership. What if we asked | ||
"Who believe String Theory wouldn't work?" | "Who believe [[String Theory]] wouldn't work?" | ||
"Who never claimed LHC SUSY was imminent?" | "Who never claimed LHC SUSY was imminent?" | ||
"Who never said Proton Decay was going to be found?" | "Who never said Proton Decay was going to be found?" | ||
| Line 172: | Line 181: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Said differently, what if our leadership is brilliant but SPECIFICALLY untrustworthy in identifying the path forward. What if 1000 David Gross & Ed Wit1ten Keynotes setting the agenda are the problem? What if Lenny Susskind is not correct sbout non-string people wasting our time. | |content=Said differently, what if our leadership is brilliant but SPECIFICALLY untrustworthy in identifying the path forward. What if 1000 [[David Gross]] & [[Ed Witten|Ed Wit1ten]] Keynotes setting the agenda are the problem? What if [[Lenny Susskind]] is not correct sbout non-string people wasting our time. | ||
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 183: | Line 192: | ||
|content=What if we *excluded* people who are consistently wrong about the path forward and asked: | |content=What if we *excluded* people who are consistently wrong about the path forward and asked: | ||
"Are there any OTHER ideas? Not Strings. Not Loops. Not Asymptotic Safety. Not Simple Compact GUTs. Not Quantum Computing. Not Black Hole Information. Not Technicolor. Not Amplitudes." | "Are there any OTHER ideas? Not [[String Theory|Strings]]. Not Loops. Not Asymptotic Safety. Not Simple Compact GUTs. Not Quantum Computing. Not Black Hole Information. Not Technicolor. Not Amplitudes." | ||
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 199: | Line 208: | ||
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1618347117277499392 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Look, we could just hold a conference: [[Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game|"Fundamental Physics: Can't *Anybody* Here Play This Game?"]] | |||
[[David Gross|David]], [[Ed Witten|Ed]], Maria, [[Cumrun Vafa|Cumrun]], [[Nathan “Nati” Seiberg|Nati]], [[Lenny Susskind|Lenny]], Juan, [[Lee Smolin|Lee]] etc. could be respondents giving constructive feedback. We would then at least learn why we are where we are. But this is nuts. | |||
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1618347118720348160 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=So I will say it from outside the field. I think the problem is that we aren't actually doing fundamental physics and havevn't been for decades. I want a survey of ALL the OTHER paths. It would probably cost a few hundred thousand dollars to fix this field. But this is bizarre. | |||
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1618347120209334275 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Let's survey the heretics who aren't even worth talking to...and then we can go right back to tiny progress when we're done, following Strings, Loops, SUSY, Standard GUTS & Asymptotic Safety all over again. At least we will know WHY we are stuck. | |||
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=8:40 PM · Jan 25, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
== Related Pages == | |||
* [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)]] | |||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:01, 27 November 2025
The phrase "Can't anybody here play this game?" is famously attributed to Casey Stengel, the manager of the New York Mets baseball team in the early 1960s. Stengel uttered this line out of frustration during a particularly dismal game where his team was making numerous errors and playing poorly.
When people use this phrase, they typically mean that they are astonished or exasperated by the incompetence or lack of skill displayed by a group of individuals attempting to perform a task. It conveys a sense of disbelief or disappointment in the collective performance of a team or group.
On X[edit]
2017[edit]
"Can't anybody here play this game?"
-Casey Stengel (1890-1975)
JUST IN: Michael Flynn has resigned as President Trump's national security adviser, two sources tell CNN. http://snpy.tv/2lebEto
2020[edit]
Cards on the table: none of this makes sense to me.
Pence, Baron and Jared are on this? We have Omarosa figuring out just what this mRNA is, with Susan at YouTube making sure no one blames China? Are we endangering our doctors & nurses sufficiently by holding back enough PPE?
World risks famines "of biblical proportions" caused by coronavirus pandemic, UN warns https://www.bbc.com/news/world-52373888
Have our senators made enough money shorting the market from security briefings? Does Nancy have enough premium chocolate ice cream and have we built the enclosed golf courses Trump will require?
Let’s make sure our journalists don’t ask any hard questions. Seemingly ever.
We have insufficient tests so we can’t track, and we send people to go home and endanger their families? China has all our critical manufacturing? Biden is senile? Bernie is 80?
In the immortal words of Casey Stengel:
I’m sorry. The bullshit. The pseudo facts. The septuagenarian and octogenarian gerontocracy. The absence of smart people or independent journalists. The inability to figure out anything that involves China.
It’s like an infinite piece of life & death immersive theater. #HuisClos
2022[edit]
“Can’t anybody here play this game?” -Casey Stengel
I don’t know what to say. What does one say to this? Are there any toxically masculine men available? With…like…testicles?
Maybe this is it. We may need actual men. Manly, smelly, glory-seeking, rugged, individualistic men.
Texas Police Lieutenant Says Cops Were Reluctant to Engage Gunman Because ‘They Could’ve Been Shot’ https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/texas-police-lieutenant-says-cops-were-reluctant-to-engage-gunman-because-they-couldve-been-shot/
2023[edit]
Discussion of the future of theoretical physics seems like a game of "Intellectual Keepaway."
Its the same group of mandarins who predicted LHC SuperSymmetry, Mini-Black holes, SU(5) Grand Unification, String Theory, Q-Gravity would work.
What do our *heretics* say instead?
Past ACP President Michael Turner and Maria Spiropulu in conversation with @overbye of @nytimes discuss the future of Physics! #physics #particlephysics #spacetime #stringtheory #physicists
For the moment, let me entertain a wild idea. Truly wild.
Here goes. What if the problem is our leadership. What if we asked
"Who believe String Theory wouldn't work?" "Who never claimed LHC SUSY was imminent?" "Who never said Proton Decay was going to be found?"
Etc.
Said differently, what if our leadership is brilliant but SPECIFICALLY untrustworthy in identifying the path forward. What if 1000 David Gross & Ed Wit1ten Keynotes setting the agenda are the problem? What if Lenny Susskind is not correct sbout non-string people wasting our time.
What if we *excluded* people who are consistently wrong about the path forward and asked:
"Are there any OTHER ideas? Not Strings. Not Loops. Not Asymptotic Safety. Not Simple Compact GUTs. Not Quantum Computing. Not Black Hole Information. Not Technicolor. Not Amplitudes."
Why is being older with a long track record of not making progress the way we select our leadership?
What if for 3 years we tried to ask: IS THERE ANYONE ELSE OUT HERE WITH OTHER IDEAS?
I know. It's stupid. It's crazy. It's self-serving. But it has been 49yrs+11Mos of this.
So I will say it from outside the field. I think the problem is that we aren't actually doing fundamental physics and havevn't been for decades. I want a survey of ALL the OTHER paths. It would probably cost a few hundred thousand dollars to fix this field. But this is bizarre.
Let's survey the heretics who aren't even worth talking to...and then we can go right back to tiny progress when we're done, following Strings, Loops, SUSY, Standard GUTS & Asymptotic Safety all over again. At least we will know WHY we are stuck.
Wouldn't a scientist ask the question:
"What if it is the leadership?"
Wouldn't that be a logical scientific question? Wouldn't that be a testable hypothesis? Why can't we ask that question as scientists? Why is that hypothesis excluded after *50* yrs?
[End Of Heresy]