Law of Gaslighting: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1646254513278566400 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=In simplest terms: | |||
To the outspoken, everything eventually migrates toward focus on institutional gaslighting/smear campaigns. | |||
Don’t believe it? Pick your 3 favorite public minds challenging institutional narratives. | |||
{{ | Now look for the signs of this trauma. | ||
So: How’d I do? | |||
🙏 | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1646249362044121088 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=[[Law of Gaslighting|LAW of GASLIGHTING]]: Any set of outspoken minds X on topic Y not aligning with modern institutions moves through 4 stages. | |||
I) Speaking out about Y.</br> | |||
II) Speaking out about Institutional Gaslighting on Y.</br> | |||
III) Finding X(Y) Gaslighting is Y independent.</br> | |||
IV) Gaslighting *replaces* Y. | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=IamEXS-profile-bL0d4PfY.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/IamEXS/status/1646245756100026368 | |||
|name=Sacha | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/IamEXS | |||
|username=IamEXS | |||
|content=Why is covering this somewhat predictable interview an active interest for so many intellectual minds today? | |||
|timestamp=8:15 PM · Apr 12, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=8:30 PM · Apr 12, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1646251796975976450 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Example: | |||
I) “How can it be that the ONLY thing we know about COVID is that it couldn’t be from the Wuhan lab.” | |||
II) “How is asking about Lab origins of COVID racist? That’s both stupid & insane.” | |||
III) “Supporting the Police is also Racist?” “Math is racist?” | |||
IV) It’s all fake. | |||
|timestamp=8:39 PM · Apr 12, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=8:50 PM · Apr 12, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
== Related Terms == | == Related Terms == | ||
* [[Cult of the Art of the Possible]] | |||
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | * [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | ||
* [[Digital Wet-work]] | * [[Digital Wet-work]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:21, 4 March 2026
LAW of GASLIGHTING: Any set of outspoken minds X on topic Y not aligning with modern institutions moves through 4 stages.
I) Speaking out about Y.
II) Speaking out about Institutional Gaslighting on Y.
III) Finding X(Y) Gaslighting is Y independent.
IV) Gaslighting *replaces* Y.
Example:
I) “How can it be that the ONLY thing we know about COVID is that it couldn’t be from the Wuhan lab.”
II) “How is asking about Lab origins of COVID racist? That’s both stupid & insane.”
III) “Supporting the Police is also Racist?” “Math is racist?”
IV) It’s all fake.
In simplest terms:
To the outspoken, everything eventually migrates toward focus on institutional gaslighting/smear campaigns.
Don’t believe it? Pick your 3 favorite public minds challenging institutional narratives.
Now look for the signs of this trauma.
So: How’d I do?
🙏