6,952
edits
Charles Lindbergh: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"
(→2016) |
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein") |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/778941171741499392 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/778941171741499392 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=The absence of [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|politically vocal living US heroes w self-minted credibility]] is entirely unnatural. | |content=The absence of [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|politically vocal living US heroes w self-minted credibility]] is entirely unnatural. | ||
My best efforts trace this to [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]]. | My best efforts trace this to [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]]. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955140105034809344 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955140105034809344 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=/END My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb. | |content=/END My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb. | ||
|media1=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21xVAAAQKrN.jpg | |media1=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21xVAAAQKrN.jpg | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=1/ The [[Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula|"Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula]], Disagreeables, & the [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|"No-Living-Heroes"]] thy. Consider adjectives: | |content=1/ The [[Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula|"Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula]], Disagreeables, & the [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|"No-Living-Heroes"]] thy. Consider adjectives: | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955119083095171072 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955119083095171072 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=2/ These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt)]] campaigns. | |content=2/ These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt)]] campaigns. | ||
|timestamp=4:45 PM · Jan 21, 2018 | |timestamp=4:45 PM · Jan 21, 2018 | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955120622123720704 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955120622123720704 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=3/ So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached. | |content=3/ So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached. | ||
|timestamp=4:51 PM · Jan 21, 2018 | |timestamp=4:51 PM · Jan 21, 2018 | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955121503653085184 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955121503653085184 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=4/ Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor. | |content=4/ Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor. | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955124432543993856 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955124432543993856 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=5/ Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick. | |content=5/ Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick. | ||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955128183816253440 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955128183816253440 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=6/ My point here is that our minds are programmed to recognize the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)|“Gated Institutional Narrative” or GIN]] and to take our emotional instructions from it. This is Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak: Adjective-Profession-Target. | |content=6/ My point here is that our minds are programmed to recognize the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)|“Gated Institutional Narrative” or GIN]] and to take our emotional instructions from it. This is Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak: Adjective-Profession-Target. | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955129704385662976 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955129704385662976 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=7/ So who are the targets? Men and women who are off the charts on the Big-5 psychometric for disagreeability. These people are the pool from which our greatest Nobel Laureates & even heroes were once drawn. | |content=7/ So who are the targets? Men and women who are off the charts on the Big-5 psychometric for disagreeability. These people are the pool from which our greatest Nobel Laureates & even heroes were once drawn. | ||
| Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955131952377442304 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955131952377442304 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=8/ This brings us to one of my most controversial theories: Ever since [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh’s]] attempt to keep the US out of WWII, our institutions have fought against us having ANY living heroes with self-minted credibility. | |content=8/ This brings us to one of my most controversial theories: Ever since [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh’s]] attempt to keep the US out of WWII, our institutions have fought against us having ANY living heroes with self-minted credibility. | ||
| Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955134621078835200 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955134621078835200 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=9/ The lesson learned from [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] appears to be that Mavericks are too dangerous to institutions...and in the case of [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] that made some sense. But what about a John Lennon? Frances Kelsey? Charlie Chaplin? Paul Robeson? Frank Wilkinson? Katharine Hepburn? | |content=9/ The lesson learned from [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] appears to be that Mavericks are too dangerous to institutions...and in the case of [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] that made some sense. But what about a John Lennon? Frances Kelsey? Charlie Chaplin? Paul Robeson? Frank Wilkinson? Katharine Hepburn? | ||
|timestamp=5:46 PM · Jan 21, 2018 | |timestamp=5:46 PM · Jan 21, 2018 | ||
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955136753454624768 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955136753454624768 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=10/ Here’s the punchline: There are suddenly way way too many disagreeable individual voices to be found for people trying to escape from the constant cognitive abuse of our institutions, which want our co-dependence on them. | |content=10/ Here’s the punchline: There are suddenly way way too many disagreeable individual voices to be found for people trying to escape from the constant cognitive abuse of our institutions, which want our co-dependence on them. | ||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955138512214306816 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955138512214306816 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=/11 | |content=/11 | ||
| Line 199: | Line 199: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173013332496385 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173013332496385 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Learn to notice accounts that overuse ridicule. An account that overuses LMAO, ROTFL, meh, ha ha, loser, etc, etc, is trying to bypass your rational mind to get at your evolutionary programming to avoid expulsion from society. | |content=Learn to notice accounts that overuse ridicule. An account that overuses LMAO, ROTFL, meh, ha ha, loser, etc, etc, is trying to bypass your rational mind to get at your evolutionary programming to avoid expulsion from society. | ||
| Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173006386733056 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173006386733056 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=We don’t empower [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|living heroes]] with the ability to challenge institutions. | |content=We don’t empower [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|living heroes]] with the ability to challenge institutions. | ||
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173009494630400 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173009494630400 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Most of my real heroes now appear before me as scoundrels. They are mired in smears, whisper campaigns, impoverished by boycotts, cancelled, beset by campaigns to discredit everything they do, say, or even observe. | |content=Most of my real heroes now appear before me as scoundrels. They are mired in smears, whisper campaigns, impoverished by boycotts, cancelled, beset by campaigns to discredit everything they do, say, or even observe. | ||
| Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173010539040771 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173010539040771 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Moral: Institutions are doing you a favor by whittling down the set of possible heroes. Ask yourself: | |content=Moral: Institutions are doing you a favor by whittling down the set of possible heroes. Ask yourself: | ||
| Line 250: | Line 250: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173012036452352 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173012036452352 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Even a *total* scoundrel may at times have something valuable to say. When someone tells you: “You should *never* listen to *anything* that person says! Don’t listen. Not a good look!” that is the dead giveaway. There is no soul on earth who that fits. Not a single one. | |content=Even a *total* scoundrel may at times have something valuable to say. When someone tells you: “You should *never* listen to *anything* that person says! Don’t listen. Not a good look!” that is the dead giveaway. There is no soul on earth who that fits. Not a single one. | ||