Chemical Rockets: Difference between revisions

 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 253: Line 253:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=#OccupyMars is good, but #FreeThePhysicists isn’t even as popular as #FreeTheNipple or #FreeBeer  
|content=<nowiki>#</nowiki>OccupyMars is good, but #FreeThePhysicists isn’t even as popular as #FreeTheNipple or #FreeBeer  


Take a look around you. Much as I love it, this place is likely going to blow.  
Take a look around you. Much as I love it, this place is likely going to blow.  
Line 451: Line 451:
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569305473011712
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569302927069187
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@elonmusk, point blank: why not save the independence of physics so that it can attempt not to break the speed of light, but to render Einstein an *effective* theory. We can’t use [[Chemical Rockets|rockets]] to do much. We are talking pennies to you. I just don’t get it. Why is this even an ask????
|content=Finally. (Yes)**100
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Elon-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1461554517527384064
|name=Elon Musk
|usernameurl=https://x.com/elonmusk
|username=elonmusk
|content=That’s what I was thinking too!
|timestamp=4:38 AM · Nov 19, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
}}
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569302927069187
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569305473011712
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Finally. (Yes)**100
|content=@elonmusk, point blank: why not save the independence of physics so that it can attempt not to break the speed of light, but to render Einstein an *effective* theory. We can’t use [[Chemical Rockets|rockets]] to do much. We are talking pennies to you. I just don’t get it. Why is this even an ask????
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
}}
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569309596020738
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569306794151936
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We should talk. But you should also be talking to @stephen_wolfram, @DavidDeutschOxf, @notevenwrong (Woit), Penrose, @garrettlisi, Julian Barbour, to say nothing of Nima, Lisa, Ed, Juan, Nati, etc. Our window is closing from groupthink and neglect.
|content=It may be a waste of money. But it is far more likely to render Einstein’s speed limit irrelevant in a deeper theory, than it is to terraform Mars and stay in this regime of hopelessness. You could dwarf the @the_IAS. Send a jolt of optimism to end the postmodern nonsense.
 
But you do you. And good luck!
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
}}
}}
Line 491: Line 499:
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569306794151936
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1461569309596020738
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It may be a waste of money. But it is far more likely to render Einstein’s speed limit irrelevant in a deeper theory, than it is to terraform Mars and stay in this regime of hopelessness. You could dwarf the @the_IAS. Send a jolt of optimism to end the postmodern nonsense.
|content=We should talk. But you should also be talking to @stephen_wolfram, @DavidDeutschOxf, @notevenwrong (Woit), Penrose, @garrettlisi, Julian Barbour, to say nothing of Nima, Lisa, Ed, Juan, Nati, etc. Our window is closing from groupthink and neglect.
 
But you do you. And good luck!
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
|timestamp=5:37 AM · Nov 19, 2021
}}
}}
Line 576: Line 586:
|timestamp=4:29 AM · Nov 21, 2021
|timestamp=4:29 AM · Nov 21, 2021
}}
}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1461569308098633733}}




Line 622: Line 629:
}}
}}


=== 2022 ===


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 656: Line 664:
Russia Invading Ukraine: a thermonuclear nation weaponizing the strong force fusion of the other nucleus (of the atom).  
Russia Invading Ukraine: a thermonuclear nation weaponizing the strong force fusion of the other nucleus (of the atom).  


https://t.co/H7KQY7xyyK.
https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Twin_Nuclei_Problem
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Feb 24, 2022
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Feb 24, 2022
}}
}}
Line 678: Line 686:
|content=COVID and Russia as the Twin Nuclei Problem: listen again with fresh ears and an open mind.
|content=COVID and Russia as the Twin Nuclei Problem: listen again with fresh ears and an open mind.


https://t.co/j4bCtAD6CS
{{#widget:YouTube|id=C2XVTUMg5kM}}
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Feb 24, 2022
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Feb 24, 2022
}}
}}
Line 716: Line 724:
}}
}}


=== 2022 ===


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 893: Line 900:
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@sneakin @elonmusk
|content=@sneakin @elonmusk
|media=EricRWeinstein-X-post-1570101628317085696-FcofG-JaEAAuecY.jpg
|media=ERW-X-post-1570101628317085696-FcofG-JaEAAuecY.jpg
|timestamp=5:26 PM · Sep 14, 2022
|timestamp=5:26 PM · Sep 14, 2022
}}
}}
Line 1,189: Line 1,196:
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=When you hear about "Peer Review" in this field, you have to understand that the field stopped working. Without nature telling us, we don't actually know who the physicists are any more. We have no idea who is a fundamental physicist. All we know is that what we do doesn't work.
|content=When you hear about "Peer Review" in this field, you have to understand that the field stopped working. Without nature telling us, we don't actually know who the physicists are any more. We have no idea who is a fundamental physicist. All we know is that what we do doesn't work.
|media=ERW-X-post-1621054172224421888-Fn8iwsfaAAAVeiu.png
|media=ERW-X-post-1621054175483432960-Fn8iwsfaAAAVeiu.png
|timestamp=7:53 AM · Feb 02, 2023
|timestamp=7:53 AM · Feb 02, 2023
}}
}}