6,873
edits
(→2021) |
(→2009) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
=== 2009 === | === 2009 === | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5648592838 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=No doubt, my points about K-meson decay and Hayflick limits in toxicology were also contaminated by my trying to make econ. a science? ;-) | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642230131 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=New Topic: Scientific Malware, Theory-Phobia, and the Proxy Economy of Science. | |||
|timestamp=5:49 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642371977 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Let me make a [[Claims|claim]]: Science is too disruptive to result in an orderly market place of ideas. If you like orderly markets, ya got trouble. | |||
|timestamp=5:58 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642463955 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=What we have built is a compromise: a proxy economy which is nothing if not orderly. In fact, the proxy economy is a towering achievment. | |||
|timestamp=6:03 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642635320 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The proxy economy gets results but in a weird way. A falsifiable hypothesis sent to a leading journal can be returned as 'speculation'. | |||
|timestamp=6:13 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5642744662 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The vulnerability of the proxy economy is that achieves an orderly market place of ideas at the expense of efficiency. Enter "Theory". | |||
|timestamp=6:20 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643070858 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=There are *distinct* fears surrounding new theory. A) It is crap. B) If not, It threatens stabilty, my grant, my oeuvre, my self-worth. | |||
|timestamp=6:42 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643167121 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=A game is to make lay people interested in radical progress fear disorderly change as if they were rentseekers, by feeding the fear of crap. | |||
|timestamp=6:48 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643361621 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=The crap, though, is easy to spot. String triumphalism, genetic determinism, etc.. Yet so is an advancement like gauge theoretic economics. | |||
|timestamp=7:02 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643613608 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=So, in my case, while *experiment* shows consumer tastes changing, we claim any theory incorporating this is crap. Now, that's some malware! | |||
|timestamp=7:20 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5643801627 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=In particle physics, wagers (more than data) have showed us how weak actual conviction in theory is relative to stated confidence. | |||
|timestamp=7:34 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
| Line 106: | Line 204: | ||
|content=[[Morals|Moral]]: Bad Theory is overblown. Good theory is a remaining threat to orderly science. But if you fear disruption, run the malware. Thx. | |content=[[Morals|Moral]]: Bad Theory is overblown. Good theory is a remaining threat to orderly science. But if you fear disruption, run the malware. Thx. | ||
|timestamp=7:44 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | |timestamp=7:44 AM · Nov 12, 2009 | ||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5647987525 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=So @orzelc claims I'm making a mistake fallling for economics as a science. Yeah. I thought we were apes with behavior to study. My bad. | |||
|timestamp=12:46 PM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=1:18 PM · Nov 12, 2009 | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 241: | Line 350: | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1169369771759919104 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=I believe in an exceptional almost complex structure on the six sphere. | |||
To each her own. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
| Line 249: | Line 368: | ||
|content=Some folks believe in angels. They have magic in their lives. | |content=Some folks believe in angels. They have magic in their lives. | ||
But if you fancy you‘re too scientific/rational for that “woo woo stuff”, you‘re still stuck with | But if you fancy you‘re too scientific/rational for that “woo woo stuff”, you‘re still stuck with “[[Exotic Spheres]].” Well...What are they doing there? | ||
[[Morals|Moral]]: don’t screw yourself out of magic. | [[Morals|Moral]]: [[Don't screw yourself out of magic|don’t screw yourself out of magic]]. | ||
https://nilesjohnson.net/seven-manifolds.html | https://nilesjohnson.net/seven-manifolds.html | ||
|timestamp=8:02 PM · Sep 4, 2019 | |timestamp=8:02 PM · Sep 4, 2019 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1169341908138639360 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Magic is everywhere. | |||
The negative mindset dividing us is not worthy of us. This is our one life. Don’t force others to waste their precious time on earth protecting hard won freedoms and institutions from self hating madness posing as a thirst for justice. | |||
Go read a 7-sphere. | |||
|timestamp=8:10 PM · Sep 4, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=EstherOfReilly-profile-SqUSgq9c.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EstherOfReilly/status/1169342081828962304 | |||
|name=Esther O'Reilly | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EstherOfReilly | |||
|username=EstherOfReilly | |||
|content=I believe in angels and demons. | |||
|timestamp=8:10 PM · Sep 4, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=10:00 PM · Sep 4, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 1,104: | Line 1,248: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=I have no idea what to make of the change in the [[UAP|UAP narrative]]. What I can tell you with certainty is that for such an ENORMOUS change in the narrative there is no sane explanation for the DOE not to be talking new physics risks and taking every one of the few claims seriously. | |content=I have no idea what to make of the change in the [[UAP|UAP narrative]]. What I can tell you with certainty is that for such an ENORMOUS change in the narrative there is no sane explanation for the DOE not to be talking new physics risks and taking every one of the few [[Claims|claims]] seriously. | ||
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021 | |timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 1,115: | Line 1,259: | ||
|content=As we saw over & over in the 20th century, any small change in physics can change everything almost overnight. From A-Bombs to Semiconductors. | |content=As we saw over & over in the 20th century, any small change in physics can change everything almost overnight. From A-Bombs to Semiconductors. | ||
The handful of PhD level claims are of negligible cost to investigate & dismiss compared to a single fighter jet. | The handful of PhD level [[Claims|claims]] are of negligible cost to investigate & dismiss compared to a single fighter jet. | ||
DOE lost the plot. | DOE lost the plot. | ||