7,016
edits
Paul Samuelson: Difference between revisions
→2025
(→2023) |
(→2025) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=I would take a look at [https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/samuelson-lecture.pdf '''Paul Samuelson'''’s Nobel lecture]. He goes into depth on revealed preference and preference field non-integrability. I think we have lost track of the fact that integrability of tastes was never actually settled except by fiat. Will talk on this. | |content=I would take a look at [https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/samuelson-lecture.pdf '''Paul Samuelson'''’s Nobel lecture]. He goes into depth on [[Revealed Preference|revealed preference]] and preference field non-integrability. I think we have lost track of the fact that integrability of tastes was never actually settled except by fiat. Will talk on this. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=I am not sure. But the first question I have is do we believe ordinal preference maps are constructable from revealed preference. | |content=I am not sure. But the first question I have is do we believe ordinal preference maps are constructable from [[Revealed Preference|revealed preference]]. | ||
|timestamp=1:59 AM · Nov 5, 2021 | |timestamp=1:59 AM · Nov 5, 2021 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 619: | Line 619: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|timestamp=4:00 PM · Apr 9, 2025 | |timestamp=4:00 PM · Apr 9, 2025 | ||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989612740046905377 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=It’s as if we, the U.S., hate being the worlds premier homegrown scientific community. All it takes is reversing self inflicted damage. That’s it. That’s all. | |||
We seem to hate our own scientists. | |||
It makes no sense. At least to me. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989608579163460068 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Yes. I’m saying that the [[Jim Simons]], [[Richard Feynman]], [[Jim Watson]], [[Steven Weinberg]], [[Sidney Coleman]], [[Ken Arrow]], [[Linus Pauling]], [[Isadore Singer]], [[Joshua Lederberg]], [[Steve Smale]], [[Paul Samuelson]], [[Mark Ptashne]], [[John Milnor]], model of homegrown American scientific genius is being destroyed. | |||
|timestamp=8:17 AM · Nov 15, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989608581470327007 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Is anyone concerned about this? It sure doesn’t seem it. | |||
Science needs [[Academic Freedom|academic freedom]]. It needs resources. It needs independence. | |||
Fauci and Collins would have been impossible if we were healthy. | |||
It is not safe to make scientists into mere employees. | |||
It’s way too dangerous. | |||
|timestamp=8:17 AM · Nov 15, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=8:33 AM · Nov 15, 2025 | |||
}} | }} | ||