Jim Watson: Difference between revisions

Jim Watson (edit)

Revision as of 06:07, 10 January 2026

1,926 bytes added , 10 January

→‎On X

Pyrope

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors

6,892

edits

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 == On X ==
+=== 2009 ===
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704496800
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Imagine before [[Jim Watson|Watson]]-[[Francis Crick|Crick]] I asked you: "Go nuts. What could possibly make [[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff's]] Equimolar rules gorgeous, motivated and canonical?"
+|thread=
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3703002903
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Ever heard an organized religion complain that G-d would never slap some butt ugly quartic potential on the world to give it mass?
+|timestamp=2:33 AM · Sep 2, 2009
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704214643
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=To Dave Bacon: "Butt ugly" referred to the present motivation for the Higgs terms as intellectual spackle. Soft mass won't likely stay ugly
+|timestamp=3:39 AM · Sep 2, 2009
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704373990
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Higgs mass is akin to the once poorly motivated "neutral currents" rejected by [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] as merely invoked for renormalizabilty. Now: not so.
+|timestamp=3:49 AM · Sep 2, 2009
+}}
+{{Tweet
+|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
+|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704435018
+|name=Eric Weinstein
+|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
+|username=EricRWeinstein
+|content=Challenge to my physics followers: what could possibly make the Mexican Hat quartic gorgeous, natural and canonical? #daretodream
+|timestamp=3:53 AM · Sep 2, 2009
+}}
+|timestamp=3:56 AM · Sep 2, 2009
+}}
 === 2019 ===