7,005
edits
Standard Model: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=With all the physics stories, can't our guys push a 'New Periodic Table' and get more focus on the standard model's 'Elements'? | |content=With all the physics stories, can't our guys push a 'New Periodic Table' and get more focus on the [[Standard Model|standard model's]] 'Elements'? | ||
|timestamp=9:58 AM · Oct 23, 2009 | |timestamp=9:58 AM · Oct 23, 2009 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 433: | Line 433: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Inneficiant presentation of the Standard Model Lagrangian. | |content=Inneficiant presentation of the [[Standard Model]] Lagrangian. | ||
|timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 14, 2019 | |timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 14, 2019 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 788: | Line 788: | ||
|content=Letâs try this again. This has almost no engagement. Iâm not buying it Twitter. Â | |content=Letâs try this again. This has almost no engagement. Iâm not buying it Twitter. Â | ||
We are on our way to having physics declared beyond the Standard Model with new matter/force needed. And, this is quite specific as to what Geometric Unity says comes next: https://geometricunity.org | We are on our way to having physics declared beyond the [[Standard Model]] with new matter/force needed. And, this is quite specific as to what Geometric Unity says comes next: https://geometricunity.org | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 798: | Line 798: | ||
|content=In strong GU: | |content=In strong GU: | ||
SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) (Standard Model) | SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) ([[Standard Model]]) | ||
Is contained in U(3)xU(2) inside  | Is contained in U(3)xU(2) inside  | ||
| Line 939: | Line 939: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=First slide of a talk on âBeyond the Standard Model physicsâ at the UCLA Schwinger-Fest conference on the g-2 muon anomaly. #Schwingerfest #UCLAPhysics | |content=First slide of a talk on âBeyond the [[Standard Model]] physicsâ at the UCLA Schwinger-Fest conference on the g-2 muon anomaly. #Schwingerfest #UCLAPhysics | ||
Sums up the mood of many. | Sums up the mood of many. | ||
| Line 953: | Line 953: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Agreement between collaborations whittles away hope for new physics beyond the Standard Model. | |content=Agreement between collaborations whittles away hope for new physics beyond the [[Standard Model]]. | ||
Will try to go over to UCLA to hear what my colleague Laurent Lellouch of the BMW group has to say today at #schwingerfest. He is not hopeful there is ANY easy BSM physics to be found. https://t.co/ISm6VKJOGm | Will try to go over to UCLA to hear what my colleague Laurent Lellouch of the BMW group has to say today at #schwingerfest. He is not hopeful there is ANY easy BSM physics to be found. https://t.co/ISm6VKJOGm | ||
| Line 992: | Line 992: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Itâs worth reflecting today on the oddity of Higgs sector within the Standard Model. | |content=Itâs worth reflecting today on the oddity of Higgs sector within the [[Standard Model]]. | ||
Three weeks ago, I heard Nobel Laureate David Gross single out the Higgs field/particle/sector/mechanism as âunnaturalâ, but what does that mean? Why single the Higgs out? | Three weeks ago, I heard Nobel Laureate David Gross single out the Higgs field/particle/sector/mechanism as âunnaturalâ, but what does that mean? Why single the Higgs out? | ||
| Line 1,027: | Line 1,027: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=So why is the Higgs still under suspicion well after it has been found? Itâs hard to say exactly. In some sense, you can see the rest of the field theory of the Standard Model as being differential geometric in origin with our best comparison of the Higgs sector being Yang-Mills. | |content=So why is the Higgs still under suspicion well after it has been found? Itâs hard to say exactly. In some sense, you can see the rest of the field theory of the [[Standard Model]] as being differential geometric in origin with our best comparison of the Higgs sector being Yang-Mills. | ||
|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 4, 2022 | |timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 4, 2022 | ||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1544023460342403072-FW15J49VsAAfNrj.jpg | |media1=ERW-X-post-1544023460342403072-FW15J49VsAAfNrj.jpg | ||
| Line 1,057: | Line 1,057: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=To quote the Architectâs speech, you would think he was describing the life of the Higgs Sector (as Neo) within the Standard Model of Particle Theory (as TheMatrix). The Higgs Mechanism is the remainder of an unbalanced (chiral Weak nuclear force) equation forbidding all mass. | |content=To quote the Architectâs speech, you would think he was describing the life of the Higgs Sector (as Neo) within the [[Standard Model|Standard Model of Particle Theory]] (as TheMatrix). The Higgs Mechanism is the remainder of an unbalanced (chiral Weak nuclear force) equation forbidding all mass. | ||
|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 4, 2022 | |timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 4, 2022 | ||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1544023473193754626-FW15KlhVsAEiAAd.jpg | |media1=ERW-X-post-1544023473193754626-FW15KlhVsAEiAAd.jpg | ||
| Line 1,389: | Line 1,389: | ||
|content=A) High energy physics of real particles became the no-energy physics of toy models. | |content=A) High energy physics of real particles became the no-energy physics of toy models. | ||
B) [[Quantum Gravity|Quantizing Gravity]] was substituted for unification or extension of the Standard model. | B) [[Quantum Gravity|Quantizing Gravity]] was substituted for unification or extension of the [[Standard Model|Standard model]]. | ||
C) Other research programs were obliterated because [[String Theory|ST]] claimed it had it all rapped up. | C) Other research programs were obliterated because [[String Theory|ST]] claimed it had it all rapped up. | ||
| Line 1,443: | Line 1,443: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=@DrBrianKeating I am not aware that the standard model and GR âwork fineâ: CKM, PNMS, Strong CP, Mass Hierarchy issues, CC origin, origins of internal symmetry, initial singularity and black hole singularity, Miniboone, etc. all require explanation. | |content=@DrBrianKeating I am not aware that the [[Standard Model|standard model]] and [[General Relativity|GR]] âwork fineâ: CKM, PNMS, Strong CP, Mass Hierarchy issues, CC origin, origins of internal symmetry, initial singularity and black hole singularity, Miniboone, etc. all require explanation. | ||
If thatâs what she means, I say itâs wrong. | If thatâs what she means, I say itâs wrong. | ||
| Line 2,086: | Line 2,086: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=If biological aliens were here from others star systems in crafts that defy the current physics of the standard model and, more importantly, general relativity, I would be one of the few people who would have a guess on day one as to how they must have gotten here. Itâs tempting. | |content=If biological aliens were here from others star systems in crafts that defy the current physics of the [[Standard Model|standard model]] and, more importantly, general relativity, I would be one of the few people who would have a guess on day one as to how they must have gotten here. Itâs tempting. | ||
|timestamp=1:44 PM · Jun 7, 2023 | |timestamp=1:44 PM · Jun 7, 2023 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 2,220: | Line 2,220: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Alternate thought experiment. 20 years from now there has been no progress beyond the standard model of particle physics. @FrankWilczek is the last living particle theorist to have made traditional contact with the physical world. What is a leading particle theorist in 2044, when no one has made progress in 70 years? Will we even know if anyone is really doing physics at that point when there are no traditionally successful theorists left but one? | |content=Alternate thought experiment. 20 years from now there has been no progress beyond the [[Standard Model|standard model]] of particle physics. @FrankWilczek is the last living particle theorist to have made traditional contact with the physical world. What is a leading particle theorist in 2044, when no one has made progress in 70 years? Will we even know if anyone is really doing physics at that point when there are no traditionally successful theorists left but one? | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 2,299: | Line 2,299: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=If you said âelectrons are absolutely fractional spin fields in the standard | |content=If you said âelectrons are absolutely fractional spin fields in the [[Standard Model|standard model]]â I wouldnât disagree with that statement. It isnât at all about what you think. It is a true statement. | ||
Here you are assuring lay people about what is absolute about [[String Theory]] within physics. | Here you are assuring lay people about what is absolute about [[String Theory]] within physics. | ||
| Line 2,495: | Line 2,495: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=M) Which approach comes closest to explaining the origin of the internal symmetry structure group of the Standard model? | |content=M) Which approach comes closest to explaining the origin of the internal symmetry structure group of the [[Standard Model|Standard model]]? | ||
N) Which approach comes closest to explaining why there appear to be 16 particles in a generation with their observed internal quantum numbers? | N) Which approach comes closest to explaining why there appear to be 16 particles in a generation with their observed internal quantum numbers? | ||