7,005
edits
Standard Model: Difference between revisions
→2019
(→2021) |
(→2019) |
||
| Line 400: | Line 400: | ||
=== 2019 === | === 2019 === | ||
{{ | {{Tweet | ||
|image=KevinThorup-profile-tdJefo8Y.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup/status/1084872396308328449 | |||
|name=Kevin Thorup | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup | |||
|username=KevinThorup | |||
|content=Thanks! I was trying to harmonize, in my mind, how (1) you described gauge theories on the JRE with (2) the formalizations above and was having a shockingly difficult time | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=logicians-profile-hA9Ttab1.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/logicians/status/1084535971830550529 | |||
|name=Philosophical Logic | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/logicians | |||
|username=logicians | |||
|content=Lol easy | |||
|media1=logicians-X-post-1084535971830550529-Dw0Lt0zUYAA4uSj.jpg | |||
|timestamp=7:41 PM · Jan 13, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=KevinThorup-profile-tdJefo8Y.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup/status/1084824698804789248 | |||
|name=Kevin Thorup | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup | |||
|username=KevinThorup | |||
|content=Fascinating. I’m curious what @EricRWeinstein‘s reaction would be to this | |||
|timestamp=2:48 PM · Jan 14, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1084871544617164801 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Inneficiant presentation of the Standard Model Lagrangian. | |||
|timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 14, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=5:58 PM · Jan 14, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 460: | Line 498: | ||
{{ | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1170821379786100736 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=There was an underlying political economy to the issue masked by “shut up & calculate”. I agree that the quantum field theorists were often, and words fail me, dicks about quantum foundations. But it was really an overlay on a rational calculation of expected return from 1928-74. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1170821377537925121 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Ok. This is a weird take. The reluctance to engage foundations of quantum mechanics stemmed from the fact that it was far less generative than research in quantum field thy for decades. When Standard Model QFT stagnated & [[Quantum Gravity]] stumbled, the opportunity cost decreased. | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Seanmcarroll-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/seanmcarroll/status/1170355961673863168 | |||
|name=Sean Carroll | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/seanmcarroll | |||
|username=seanmcarroll | |||
|content=Shots fired! "Even Physicists Don’t Understand Quantum Mechanics. Worse, they don’t seem to want to understand it." -- me, in the New York Times @nytopinion #SomethingDeeply | |||
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/opinion/sunday/quantum-physics.html | |||
|media1=seanmcarroll-X-post-1170355961673863168.jpg | |||
|timestamp=3:19 PM · Sep 8, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=10:09 PM · Sep 8, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=10:09 PM · Sep 8, 2019 | |||
}} | |||
=== 2020 === | === 2020 === | ||