Anti-Interesting: Difference between revisions

270 bytes added ,  6 December 2025
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 39: Line 39:


=== 2020 ===
=== 2020 ===


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 55: Line 54:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news & professors. They are not disinterested, but '''anti-interested'''. Except for Greg.
|content=Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news & professors. They are not disinterested, but [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interested]]. Except for Greg.
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=greggutfeld-profile.jpg
|image=greggutfeld-profile.jpg
Line 73: Line 72:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is '''anti-interesting'''? Well Jeffery Epstein’s wealth source is '''anti-interesting''' to media. Bernie in 2016 was '''anti-interesting''' to @nytimes. Income inequality was '''anti-interesting''' to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was '''anti-interesting'''. Building Seven too.
|content=What is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]? Well Jeffery Epstein’s wealth source is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] to media. Bernie in 2016 was [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] to @nytimes. Income inequality was [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. Building Seven too.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179678842933248-EO7y8xoUUAAphUb.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179678842933248-EO7y8xoUUAAphUb.jpg
Line 83: Line 82:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically '''anti-interesting'''. Flight 800 is pretty '''anti-interesting''' as was the [[Boskin Commission|Boskin Commission’s]] attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the [[CPI]]. The [[H-1B Visa|H1-B visa]] history is '''anti-interesting'''. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.
|content=To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. Flight 800 is pretty [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] as was the [[Boskin Commission|Boskin Commission’s]] attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the [[CPI]]. The [[H-1B Visa|H1-B visa]] history is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179684547149826-EO7y9I5VAAAcl0i.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179684547149826-EO7y9I5VAAAcl0i.jpg
Line 93: Line 92:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content='''Anti-interesting''', adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
|content=[[Anti-Interesting|Anti-interesting]], adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]].
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
}}
Line 271: Line 270:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Are Enormous Canadian Trucker Protests '''Anti-Interesting'''? If so, why?
|content=Q: Are Enormous Canadian Trucker Protests [[Anti-Interesting]]? If so, why?
|timestamp=6:06 PM · Jan 29, 2022
|timestamp=6:06 PM · Jan 29, 2022
|media1=ERW-X-post-1487487234273996802-CXYvAcDHdFilGB1k.png
|media1=ERW-X-post-1487487234273996802-CXYvAcDHdFilGB1k.png
Line 283: Line 282:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content='''“Anti-Interesting”''' is an important concept: not everyone has experienced it, but once you see it even a single time, you will see it repeatedly thereafter.
|content=[[Anti-Interesting|“Anti-Interesting”]] is an important concept: not everyone has experienced it, but once you see it even a single time, you will see it repeatedly thereafter.
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=SteveGuest-profile.jpg
|image=SteveGuest-profile.jpg
Line 310: Line 309:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This story is '''anti-interesting''' in the way that Jeffrey Epstein is '''anti-interesting'''.
|content=This story is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] in the way that [[Jeffrey Epstein]] is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]].
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 320: Line 319:
|content=How interesting to corporate media are public airings of the details of the relationships between FBI, Twitter, the Military, elections and THE MEDIA itself?
|content=How interesting to corporate media are public airings of the details of the relationships between FBI, Twitter, the Military, elections and THE MEDIA itself?


Follow the pathological disinterest. Follow silence. Follow what is '''anti-interesting'''. Let the “[[Nothing Burger]]” guide you.
Follow the pathological disinterest. [[Follow the Silence|Follow silence]]. Follow what is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. Let the “[[Nothing Burger]]” guide you.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1605626608739528705-FkhU5CKUYAA8OuQ.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1605626608739528705-FkhU5CKUYAA8OuQ.jpg
|quote=
|quote=
Line 462: Line 461:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you want to understand Trump & RFK,  make it very simple. Ignore the errors and issues for a moment. ALL of them. They’re the only 2 major candidates working at the scope of “Maybe almost EVERYTHING important/weird that we’re told by institutions is potentially totally wrong.”
|content=If you want to understand [[Donald Trump|Trump]] & RFK,  make it very simple. Ignore the errors and issues for a moment. ALL of them. They’re the only 2 major candidates working at the scope of “Maybe almost EVERYTHING important/weird that we’re told by institutions is potentially totally wrong.”
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 573: Line 572:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is this so '''anti-interesting'''?
|content=Why is this so [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]?


Just search on “Furin”, “SARS-CoV” “Spike Protein”, “Wuhan” and “DTRA” for @doddtra. Wouldn’t you **want** deep public hearings if this was all a super unfortunate coincidence? Right??
Just search on “Furin”, “SARS-CoV” “Spike Protein”, “Wuhan” and “DTRA” for @doddtra. Wouldn’t you **want** deep public hearings if this was all a super unfortunate coincidence? Right??