The Portal Wiki

No-Living-Heroes Theory: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

No-Living-Heroes Theory (edit)

Revision as of 19:42, 3 December 2025

31,581 bytes added ,  Yesterday at 19:42
→‎2020
No edit summary
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://theportal.wiki/wiki/18:_Slipping_the_DISC:_State_of_The_Portal/Chapter_2020#No_Living_Heroes The Portal Ep 18]
The "No-Living-Heroes Theory," as coined by Eric Weinstein, claims that contemporary society is reluctant to celebrate worthy living individuals as heroes. Historically, exceptional figures like aviators and explorers were publicly honored, exemplified by numerous ticker-tape parades. However, this practice has diminished, likely due in part to complex figures such as [[Charles Lindbergh]], whose controversial views conflicted with his heroic achievements.
 
[[File:Lindbergh-ticker-tape-parade.jpg|thumb|1927 Ticker Tape Parade celebrating one of our last American heroes, Charles Lindbergh (1902-1974)]]
 
Weinstein posits that institutions may suppress the elevation of individuals to prevent challenges to their authority, leading to a cultural environment where heroism is often confined to fictional narratives, and real-life figures are scrutinized or marginalized.
 
==On The Portal==
 
<blockquote>
''This brings us to a final issue, which I think is incredibly important, which has to do with why there are no living heroes. In effect, we almost don't believe in heroism. As soon as somebody starts to make us excited about the world and what is possible for the individual, we come to start feeling terrible about that person, unless they're trapped inside of a Marvel movie, or something like that. If you go back to the history of ticker tape parades, you will see that there were many ticker tape parades given for individual aviators, individual explorers, ships captains who put their ship at risk to rescue the crew of another–and, in fact, this pattern largely stopped.''
 
''My contention is that the difficult case of [[Charles Lindbergh]] may have marked a turning point. In [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh's]] case, he had flown solo to Europe from the United States and come back a hero, I believe in the late 1920s. Now, [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] was a very difficult human being to deal with, because he was an authentic hero, and he was also somebody who believed in America First, and in isolationism, and given the Nazi menace in Europe, I think it's almost an unforgivable position. Nevertheless, the fact is that [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindberg]] commanded tremendous popularity, and that popularity could have been used to keep the U.S. out of a war.''
 
''What I find is that, since [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]], it has been very rare to elevate any individual to the point where they can oppose our institutions. The Pete Seegers and [[Albert Einstein|Albert Einsteins]] of the world, who fought against McCarthyism, were a huge danger to the industry that was cropping up around anti-communism. When it came to the Vietnam War, it was very dangerous to have popular entertainers, like John Lennon, who were against it.''
 
''We have been frightened about individuals coming to rival our institutions in terms of power. And that's what's so great about the new revolution in long-form podcasting, and all of these other forms of social media. Now, we have a great danger in that most of these platforms are mediated. We saw what happened to Alex Jones. It's quite possible that if these powerful institutions come to believe that a particular individual should be removed, they can always choose to enforce the rules in a different way.''
 
''We saw recently the advent of Terms of Service changes to include deadnaming. Now if I say that Walter Carlos composed the album Switched-On Bach, or performed the album Switched-On Bach, that is a true statement. But because Walter Carlos became Wendy Carlos, I have no idea whether or not I can be accused of deadnaming. Now imagine that you have a hundred such rules, rules that are never spelled out, never clear, that can be enforced any which way to deny someone access to the major platforms. This is the great danger with this moment. We have unprecedented access, but we also have a gating function, which can be turned on at any time if we fall out of line with the institutions.''
 
'''- Eric Weinstein''' on [https://theportal.wiki/wiki/18:_Slipping_the_DISC:_State_of_The_Portal/Chapter_2020#No_Living_Heroes The Portal, Ep 18], Released 15 Jan, 2020
</blockquote>
 
{{#widget:YouTube|id=QxnkGymKuuI|start=3350}}
 
==On Lex Fridman==
<blockquote>
''The more heroic you are, the more beautiful you are, the more you will be made to suffer.''
 
'''- Eric Weinstein''' on [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2nG7-eXxko&t=4892s Lex Fridman, Ep 134], Released Oct 29, 2020
</blockquote>


{{#widget:YouTube|id=o2nG7-eXxko|start=4892}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=o2nG7-eXxko|start=4892}}


[[category:Ericisms]]
==On X==
[[File:MLK-Letter.jpg|thumb|Letter sent to Martin Luther King Jr. urging him to commit suicide.]]
 
=== 2011 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/27071821434064897
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Redacted 11/20/64 US Government letter attempting to induce Martin Luther King Jr to kill himself: http://bit.ly/dYNrtO. #COINTELPRO #MLKday
|timestamp=6:36 PM · Jan 17, 2011
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/29689057860653056
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Before we ask why there are no giants left, let's check the gutters ... just to be sure: http://bit.ly/hn51pQ (Google trans. 1973 Samizdat).
|timestamp=11:56 PM · Jan 24, 2011
}}
 
=== 2016 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/778941171741499392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The absence of [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|politically vocal living US heroes w self-minted credibility]] is entirely unnatural.
My best efforts trace this to [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]].
|timestamp=12:57 PM · Sep 22, 2016
}}
 
=== 2017 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821152663530184704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=/END This is the single cleanest end-to-end example I have of what we may be up against. Now it is yours. Thank you MLK. &amp; Jean so so much.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821137247416111104
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1/ US Deep-State use of "Fake News" in Main Stream Media to Destroy Inconvenient US Citizens: A tweetstorm in honor of Black America &amp; MLK.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/27071821434064897
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Redacted 11/20/64 US Government letter attempting to induce Martin Luther King Jr to kill himself: http://bit.ly/dYNrtO. #COINTELPRO #MLKday
|timestamp=5:36 PM · Jan 17, 2011
}}
|timestamp=11:29 PM · Jan 16, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821138198868815872
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=2/ The only time we have tried "draining the swamp" of the US DeepState in memory was around the so-called Church Committee in the mid '70s.
|timestamp=11:32 PM · Jan 16, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821139268126928897
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=3/ One of the most disturbing findings from that era was the extent of manipulation of MSM journalism by the CIA in "Operation Mockingbird."
|timestamp=11:37 PM · Jan 16, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821140504339300352
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=4/ I'd however like to focus on a single well documented case of how the US Deep-State destroyed a civil rights activist w/ MSM "Fake News."
|timestamp=11:42 PM · Jan 16, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821141677087682560
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=5/ Jean Seberg was a beautiful blonde US movie star w/ an interest in Black activism, who the Hoover FBI privately decided to destroy w MSM.
|timestamp=11:46 PM · Jan 16, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821143343006502912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=6/ In this memo the FBI requests permission to have a pregnant movie star 'Neurtalized' using a "fake news" story waiting for her baby bump.
|timestamp=11:53 PM · Jan 16, 2017
|media1=ERW-X-post-821143343006502912-C2VIQUHVEAAswKy.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821144343742320640
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=7/ Next to "Cheapen her image" &amp; "cause her embarrassment" the Deep-State fabricates a Slut-shaming story that she's carrying a black child.
|timestamp=11:57 PM · Jan 16, 2017
|media1=ERW-X-post-821144343742320640-C2VKRxVUoAAmID0.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821145410487996416
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=8/ The FBI selects the mainstream media &amp; therefore wants unusual precaution so the story is untraceable: "The dear girl is getting around!"
|timestamp=12:01 AM · Jan 17, 2017
|media1=ERW-X-post-821145410487996416-C2VKsAfUsAAg4vM.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821146597589295106
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=9/ The FBI has the 5/19/70 @latimes run the story that Jean Seberg is pregnant by cuckolding her white husband with a Black Panther's baby.
|timestamp=12:06 AM · Jan 17, 2017
|media1=ERW-X-post-821146597589295106-C2VMWAOVIAEJtxa.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821147309593329665
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=10/ In case any of you believe there's no connection between the Deep State, MSM, Journalism &amp; Fake News, here is the full @latimes article.
|timestamp=12:09 AM · Jan 17, 2017
|media1=ERW-X-post-821147309593329665-C2VNGw0UcAQGBxX.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821148266586742784
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=11/ The FBI 'Kompromat' against a lawful US celebrity gets amplified by @newsweek and other echoing publications in &amp; out of the mainstream.
|timestamp=12:12 AM · Jan 17, 2017
|media1=Seberging.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821148965877841921
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=12/ Jean Seberg is destroyed mentally &amp; miscarries a white child in response. She holds an open casket press conference disproving the lies.
|timestamp=12:15 AM · Jan 17, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821149904579891201
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=13/ Seberg divorces, becomes deranged &amp; repeatedly tries suicide every year on the anniversary of her baby's death. In 1979, she succeeds.
|timestamp=12:19 AM · Jan 17, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821150489697890304
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=14/ Eventually we drain the Deep-State swamp enough to learn it was all a deadly mainstream media/FBI hoax &amp; @latimes admits to "Fake News":
|timestamp=12:21 AM · Jan 17, 2017
|media1=ERW-X-post-821150489697890304-C2VP9vEVQAI8t54.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821151832328126464
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=15/ We know our MSM news is sullying by reputation nearly everyone w a hope of bringing radical change. We don't know who is being targeted.
|timestamp=12:27 AM · Jan 17, 2017
}}
|timestamp=12:30 AM · Jan 17, 2017
}}
 
=== 2018 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955140105034809344
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=/END My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb.
|media1=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21xVAAAQKrN.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21zVMAAz01E.jpg
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1/ The [[Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula|"Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula]], Disagreeables, &amp; the [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|"No-Living-Heroes"]] thy. Consider adjectives:
 
Embattled</br>
Controversial</br>
Divisive</br>
Reclusive</br>
Provocative</br>
Struggling</br>
Right-Wing</br>
Eccentric</br>
Self-styled</br>
Far-Left</br>
Recovering</br>
Disgraced</br>
Self-Promoting</br>
Free-thinking</br>
Volatile</br>
etc.
|timestamp=4:39 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955119083095171072
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=2/ These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt)]] campaigns.
|timestamp=4:45 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955120622123720704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=3/ So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached.
|timestamp=4:51 PM · Jan 21, 2018
|media1=ERW-X-post-955120622123720704-DUFE4AfVMAA8Sxx.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955121503653085184
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=4/ Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor.
 
So...how can that be?
|timestamp=4:54 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955124432543993856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=5/ Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick.
 
The point is that real humans don’t talk like this.
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Jan 21, 2018
|media1=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImTEVoAAtgWY.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImTDVoAEZMnL.jpg
|media3=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImUkVoAAf0Bk.jpg
|media4=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImUlVQAAcbBH.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955128183816253440
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=6/ My point here is that our minds are programmed to recognize the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)|“Gated Institutional Narrative” or GIN]] and to take our emotional instructions from it. This is Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak: Adjective-Profession-Target.
 
Or so asserts self-styled Internet personality @EricRWeinstein.
|timestamp=5:21 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955129704385662976
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=7/ So who are the targets? Men and  women who are off the charts on the Big-5 psychometric for disagreeability. These people are the pool from which our greatest Nobel Laureates &amp; even heroes were once drawn.
 
And right now the internet is having a bull market in disagreeability.
|timestamp=5:27 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955131952377442304
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=8/ This brings us to one of my most controversial theories: Ever since [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh’s]] attempt to keep the US out of WWII, our institutions have fought against us having ANY living heroes with self-minted credibility.
 
This leaves a vacuum filled by acceptable institutional figures.
|timestamp=5:36 PM · Jan 21, 2018
|media1=ERW-X-post-955131952377442304-DUFPcROU0AEURlO.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955134621078835200
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=9/ The lesson learned from [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] appears to be that Mavericks are too dangerous to institutions...and in the case of [[Charles Lindbergh|Lindbergh]] that made some sense. But what about a John Lennon? Frances Kelsey? Charlie Chaplin? Paul Robeson? Frank Wilkinson? Katharine Hepburn?
|timestamp=5:46 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955136753454624768
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=10/ Here’s the punchline: There are suddenly way way too many disagreeable individual voices to be found for people trying to escape from the constant cognitive abuse of our institutions, which want our co-dependence on them.
 
So something new *has* to happen.
 
Here goes...
|timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955138512214306816
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=/11
 
Either:
 
A) The spell of the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)|GIN]] breaks and we have lots of real self-minted heroes again.
 
B) Disagreeables like Jordan Peterson, Camille Paglia, Nassim Taleb, Douglas Murray, Claire Lehman, etc... all get taken out.
 
C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables.
|timestamp=6:02 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
|timestamp=6:08 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
 
=== 2020 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173013332496385
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Learn to notice accounts that overuse ridicule. An account that overuses LMAO, ROTFL, meh, ha ha, loser, etc, etc, is trying to bypass your rational mind to get at your evolutionary programming to avoid expulsion from society.
 
Learn to notice the strategy working, and laugh. 🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173006386733056
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We don’t empower [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|living heroes]] with the ability to challenge institutions.
 
We allow for individuals tied to institutions. We allow collective heroism (e.g. crews of astronauts are neither individual nor unaffiliated). But Lindbergh taught them the danger.
 
And so we now destroy.
|timestamp=9:40 PM · Sep 10, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173009494630400
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Most of my real heroes now appear before me as scoundrels. They are mired in smears, whisper campaigns, impoverished by boycotts, cancelled, beset by campaigns to discredit everything they do, say, or even observe.
 
That isn’t an accident. It is reputation warfare known as [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|F.U.D.]]
|timestamp=9:40 PM · Sep 10, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173010539040771
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Morals|Moral]]: Institutions are doing you a favor by whittling down the set of possible heroes. Ask yourself:
 
[[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|FEAR]]: who frightens me?
 
[[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|UNCERTAINTY]]: who is unpredictable?
 
[[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|DOUBT]]: who lives under a cloud of questions particularly with respect to motive.
 
Then ask: is there a [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|FUD]] campaign?
|timestamp=9:40 PM · Sep 10, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1304173012036452352
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Even a *total* scoundrel may at times have something valuable to say. When someone tells you: “You should *never* listen to *anything* that person says! Don’t listen. Not a good look!” that is the dead giveaway. There is no soul on earth who that fits. Not a single one.
 
Lastly:
|timestamp=9:40 PM · Sep 10, 2020
}}
|timestamp=9:40 PM · Sep 10, 2020
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1327342239823982592
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Who is writing these god-like messages at Twitter?
 
[[Technology Intelligence Media (TIM)|TIM]] is:
 
[[Technology Intelligence Media (TIM)|Technology-Intelligence-Media]]
 
I’ll be very surprised if there‘s no quiet TIM working-group, ostensibly around foreign meddling in US matters, that has been exceeding a narrow mandate to influence what we see here.🙏
|media1=ERW-X-post-1327342239823982592-Emuqu2zUUAA_Z7A.jpg
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1327342212913393664
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As I often point out, the US Federal Government is *proven* to be capable of conspiring to use our independent American News Media to covertly tarnish famous law abiding politically inconvenient Americans.
 
“Seberging”-cancellation is not conspiracy theory. It is conspiracy-fact.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=latimes-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/latimes/status/1327324871072776193
|name=Los Angeles Times
|usernameurl=https://x.com/latimes
|username=latimes
|content=Actress [[Seberging|Jean Seberg]] was born November 13, 1938.
 
Fifty years ago, a senior editor at the Los Angeles Times came into possession of a dangerous piece of gossip, leaked to the paper by the FBI. We printed it, and the actress' life was destroyed.
|media1=latimes-X-post-1327324871072776193.png
|timestamp=5:58 PM · Nov 13, 2020
}}
|timestamp=8:06 PM · Nov 13, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1327342219909505024
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ask yourself: how many prominent  law abiding politically inconvenient people has the US government tried to destroy?
 
We know:
 
[[Fred Hampton]]</br>
John Lennon</br>
[[Seberging|Jean Seberg]]</br>
[[Dick Gregory]]</br>
MLK</br>
Pete Seeger
 
How many other news hit pieces come from the Deep State &amp; are fed to news? Only one?
|timestamp=8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1327342219909505024-EmuqtsvUwAADVxb.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1327342230734995456
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I believe that we used to have real heroes (e.g. [[Katherine Hepburn]]) &amp; our heroes got too expensive for our institutional class. Now, all who start to show too much public independence seem mysteriously to get taken down by media (e.g. @elonmusk).
 
After [[Seberging|Jean]], we have to wonder...
|timestamp=8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1327342230734995456-Emuqt92UcAEBsOf.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-1327342230734995456-Emuqt-TVEAAhRBY.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1327342235654836224
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Think how impossible it is to believe this. The *only* time we ever really checked our own intelligence, we found a deep state using our mainstream independent news media to destroy citizens over politics.
 
Q: How many cancellation stories have you read? Are they ALL journalism?
|timestamp=8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1327342235654836224-EmuquqLUcAIjUzs.jpg
}}
|timestamp=8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020
}}
 
=== 2024 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1772647180903608563
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I have been warning people about this since the 1980s and did so more actively on Twitter 2011-2017. I think I will keep posting this old thread more often to remind our friends in the USG that this has been anticipated.
 
This was always coming. And it will always take the apparent form of independent voices in places like Nature, The Lancet, The LA Times, Harvard, the NAS.
 
Everyone you could turn to when you need to question the state will have been preemptively splattered with feces.
 
Learn the pattern of Seberging. The ‘tells’ are relentless mockery, private life invasion and FUD against independent minded people of influence through ostensibly non state actors.
 
I know this was long. Thanks for your time. 🙏
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/821137247416111104
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1/ US Deep-State use of "Fake News" in Main Stream Media to Destroy Inconvenient US Citizens: A tweetstorm in honor of Black America &amp; MLK. https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/27071821434064897
|timestamp=11:29 PM · Jan 16, 2017
}}
|media1=Seberg-FBI-Admits-Spreading-Lies.jpg
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1772638248969371815
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The technical name for this article’s swift and devastating takedown strategy inside the FBI is [[Image Cheapening|“Image Cheapening”]] which we have known since the 1970s via Davidon et al.
 
<nowiki>#</nowiki>HumanTerrain</br>
<nowiki>#</nowiki>[[No-Living-Heroes Theory|NoLivingHeroesTheory]]
|media1=Seberg-Image-Cheapening.jpg
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=NYMag-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/NYMag/status/1772187955525722177
|name=New York Magazine
|usernameurl=https://x.com/NYMag
|username=NYMag
|content=For our latest cover story, @KerryHowley went deep into the wellness-obsessed world of Andrew Huberman, talking with former girlfriends who reveal a darker side to the neuroscientist-turned-podcast host: manipulative behavior, deceit, and numerous affairs https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/andrew-huberman-podcast-stanford-joe-rogan.html
|media1=NYMag-X-post-1772187955525722177-GJgTjJXWoAAgSic.jpg
|timestamp=2:54 PM · Mar 26, 2024
}}
|timestamp=2:54 PM · Mar 26, 2024
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1772641003650105502
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We don’t yet know why it was written. We don’t yet know who commissioned it.
 
We do know that no independent minded health professional who could contradict the public health institutions and czars has been allowed to ascend to @hubermanlab’s level of popularity, power and influence without [[Image Cheapening|“Image Cheapening”]] coverage.
 
In fact, since Lindbergh used his popularity to sway public opinion on entry into WWII, no independent minded individual has been
amassed state-level influence without such FUD (Fear-Uncertainty-Doubt) campaigns. The theory we have advanced behind this is that the State learned the lesson from Lindbergh’s interference with FDR that all charismatic independent minded individuals (like a John Lennon) cannot be allowed state levels of influence and must be preemptively cheapened and harassed. Here it is applied to medical professionals who could interfere with future Anthony Fauci health czars.
 
Cc: @DrJBhattacharya, @MartinKulldorff, @RandPaul
 
This is the medical version of “No Living Heroes” theory:
 
https://theportal.wiki/wiki/No-Living-Heroes_Theory
|timestamp=3:05 PM · Mar 26, 2024
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1772643325700411579
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is not that heroes are not allowed. Just not ones that can make active decisions on a going forward basis.
 
We celebrate the birthday of the target of this FBI [[Image Cheapening|“Image Cheapening”]] campaign as a national holiday.
 
<nowiki>#</nowiki>NoLivingHeroes</br>
<nowiki>#</nowiki>IHaveADream
|media1=MLK-Letter.jpg
|timestamp=3:14 PM · Mar 26, 2024
}}
|timestamp=3:29 PM · Mar 26, 2024
}}
 
==See Also==
 
* [[Abomination Ratio]]
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]]
* [[Break-Glass-in-case-of-Emergency People]]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Committee Church Committee]
* [[Communication Security Complex]]
* [[Deaths of Accountability]]
* [[Digital Wet-work]]
* [[Early is another name for wrong]]
* [[Fact Burning]]
* [https://thebasics.guide/fud/ Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)]
* [[Follow the Silence]]
* [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]]
* [[High Agency]]
* [[Image Cheapening]]
* [https://thebasics.guide/information-asymmetry/ Information Asymmetry]
* [[Jessupization]]
* [[Kayfabrication]]
* [[Managed Reality TM]]
* [[Prebunked Malinformation]]
* [[Regulated Expression]]
* [[Seberging]]
* [[Section A of the Reserve Index]]
* [[Steady Hands]]
* [[The United States of Absolutely Nothing (U.S.A.N.)]]
* [[Tuskegee Principle]]
* [[Universal Institutional Betrayal]]
 
[[Category:Ericisms]]
[[Category:Twin Nuclei Problem]]
[[Category:History]]
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/8324...24596"