The Portal Wiki

Academic Freedom: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Academic Freedom (edit)

Revision as of 06:37, 3 December 2025

10,096 bytes added ,  Wednesday at 06:37
→‎2021
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Academic freedom''' refers not merely to the formal right of scholars to speak without punishment, but to a broader system of intellectual independence that enables genuine innovation, dissent, and cross-disciplinary thought.  
'''Academic freedom''' refers to a broad system of intellectual independence that enables genuine innovation, dissent, and cross-disciplinary thought.  


Eric Weinstein sees Academic Freedom as a civilizational issue: without the ability to question orthodoxy, societies lose the capacity for self-correction and innovation.
Eric Weinstein sees Academic Freedom as a civilizational issue: without the ability to question orthodoxy and do original work on high-leverage, high-risk problems, societies lose the capacity for self-correction and innovation.


== On X ==
== On X ==
Line 117: Line 117:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I should say that Gauge theoretic economics is also all about academic freedom, quashed as it was by the rennegade Boskin Commission idiocy.
|content=I should say that Gauge theoretic economics is also all about '''academic freedom''', quashed as it was by the rennegade [[Boskin Commission]] idiocy.
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 188: Line 188:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What few people admit is that opposing  "String Theory", "The Great Moderation", "Scientist Shortages" etc...leads to excommunication.
|content=What few people admit is that opposing  "[[String Theory]]", "[[Great Moderation|The Great Moderation]]", "[[Labor Shortages|Scientist Shortages]]" etc...leads to excommunication.
|timestamp=8:37 PM ¡ Dec 19, 2009
|timestamp=8:37 PM ¡ Dec 19, 2009
}}
}}
Line 335: Line 335:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The talk presented evidence to the National Academy of Sciences that NAS & @NSF partnered to manipulate markets over scientist salaries.
|content=The talk presented evidence to the National Academy of Sciences that NAS & [[National Science Foundation|@NSF]] partnered to manipulate markets over scientist salaries.
|timestamp=2:38 PM ¡ Dec 20, 2009
|timestamp=2:38 PM ¡ Dec 20, 2009
}}
}}
Line 344: Line 344:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now ask yourself why would @NSF be trying to weaken American scientists? Why would NAS help? How would NSF dependent scientists self-defend?
|content=Now ask yourself why would @NSF be trying to weaken American scientists? Why would NAS help? How would [[National Science Foundation|NSF]] dependent scientists self-defend?
|timestamp=8:11 PM ¡ Dec 20, 2009
|timestamp=8:11 PM ¡ Dec 20, 2009
}}
}}
Line 693: Line 693:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Moral: We appear to be caught in loops of our own creation. If so, conventional moves will continue to produce this cycling around the drain. It is time to consider more exotic moves to pull ourselves out.  
|content=[[Morals|Moral]]: We appear to be caught in loops of our own creation. If so, conventional moves will continue to produce this cycling around the drain. It is time to consider more exotic moves to pull ourselves out.  


We can no longer afford to fill the world w/ sheep, NPCs & followers.
We can no longer afford to fill the world w/ sheep, NPCs & followers.
Line 1,058: Line 1,058:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=BTW, what matters here is that Rolling Stone is mainstream enough that they are unlikely to be fully ignored. As this account was when repeatedly bringing up Epstein as a construct of the IC…
|content=BTW, what matters here is that Rolling Stone is mainstream enough that they are unlikely to be fully ignored. As this account was when repeatedly bringing up [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]] as a construct of the IC…
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 1,066: Line 1,066:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Wait. Jeffrey Epstein was connected to the Intelligence Community?
|content=Wait. [[Jeffrey Epstein]] was connected to the Intelligence Community?


Thank you @RollingStone!!! Can we finally get to the point where we are asking why THERE HAS BEEN TOTAL COOPERATION of the Press with what is likely a **TOTALY** UNETHICAL IC OPERATION?🙏
Thank you @RollingStone!!! Can we finally get to the point where we are asking why THERE HAS BEEN TOTAL COOPERATION of the Press with what is likely a **TOTALY** UNETHICAL IC OPERATION?🙏
Line 1,080: Line 1,080:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I want '''academic freedom''' on this platform @jack. It takes too long for the normies and the press to get to the truth. Your @TwitterSafety just isn’t good enough. This account was taking HUGE risk to talk about Epstein and intelligence.  
|content=I want [[Academic Freedom|academic freedom]] on this platform @jack. It takes too long for the normies and the press to get to the truth. Your @TwitterSafety just isn’t good enough. This account was taking HUGE risk to talk about [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]] and intelligence.  


Don’t ever think of throttling me again.
Don’t ever think of throttling me again.
Line 1,324: Line 1,324:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=X) Loss of '''Academic Freedom''' across the board in Academe.
|content=X) Loss of [[Academic Freedom]] across the board in Academe.


Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.
Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.
Line 1,330: Line 1,330:
Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to @doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.
Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to @doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.


Moral: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.
[[Morals|Moral]]: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 1,342: Line 1,342:
A) COVID's origin.
A) COVID's origin.


B) The Jeffrey Epstein story.
B) The [[Jeffrey Epstein]] story.


C) UAP.
C) UAP.
Line 1,365: Line 1,365:
|content=I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.
|content=I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.


J) Adulteration of BLS CPI measure of inflation.
J) Adulteration of BLS [[CPI]] measure of inflation.


K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.
K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.
Line 1,583: Line 1,583:
}}
}}
|timestamp=5:17 AM ¡ Feb 7, 2022
|timestamp=5:17 AM ¡ Feb 7, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1490951516085448705
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I spent a lot of time in beautiful homes and second homes of older research scientists as a grad student.
We should be embarrassed how far into [[The Precariat|precariousness]] we pushed Generation X & Millennials. Our entire economy is now bet on bargain science provided way below market.#Enough
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1490949894076469249
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Keep your mouth shut or lose job security.
Sometimes @skdh drives me nuts. Usually, it’s in a good way. Can no one  with money or power fix this situation? No? Of course not. You want science slaves. How’s that working in virology?
Somebody get our scientists wealth & [[Academic Freedom|freedom]].
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=skdh-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/skdh/status/1490945304438345728
|name=Sabine Hossenfelder
|usernameurl=https://x.com/skdh
|username=skdh
|content=Of course the vast majority of people who work in the foundations of physics want me to stop pointing out they are working on pseudoscience. Of course I know that this means I will never get a permanent position.
|timestamp=7:07 AM ¡ Feb 8, 2022
}}
|timestamp=7:25 AM ¡ Feb 8, 2022
}}
|timestamp=7:31 AM ¡ Feb 8, 2022
}}
}}


Line 1,896: Line 1,933:
}}
}}


=== 2025 ===


== References ==
{{Tweet
* [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6876559130 Eric Weinstein, X (Dec 19, 2009, 8:27 PM)] 
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
* [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6876592243 Eric Weinstein, X (Dec 19, 2009, 8:31 PM)]
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912212831178768713
* [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6087639020 Eric Weinstein, X (Nov 25, 2009, 5:09 AM)]
|name=Eric Weinstein
* [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/7167122255 Eric Weinstein, X (Dec 1, 2009, 2:33 PM)] 
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
* [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/870134334708465664 Eric Weinstein, X (Jun 1, 2017)]
|username=EricRWeinstein
* [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233846760509865985 Eric Weinstein, X (Feb 29, 2020)]
|content=@Harvard There is just something special about Harvard lying to Harvard about Harvard because it’s Harvard.
 
Not to tell Harvard its business, but at some point you have to stop this. Your brand has “moved” after having a plagiarist leader. Or haven’t you noticed? Or don’t you care?
🤷‍♀️
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912196954173632588
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Your Economics department took orders from 2 senators (Packwood (R) & Moynihan (D)) as an extension of the USG to bury my research w/ P Malaney so that it could fake a 1.1% [[CPI]] overstatement to raise Taxes (via indexed brackets) and cut SS payments (via COLAs)!
 
You are lying.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Harvard-profile-JO5OsmxU.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Harvard/status/1911835670953214401
|name=Harvard University
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Harvard
|username=Harvard
|content=“No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private  universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.” - President Alan Garber
|timestamp=5:35 PM ¡ Apr 14, 2025
}}
|timestamp=5:30 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
|media1=ERW-X-post-1912196954173632588-Gol8_m-WoAEvBcs.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912201139522846957
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let me explain the previous slide of [[Boskin Commission|Boskin Commissioner]] Prof. Robert Gordon in plain English.
 
Harvard’s Samuel W. Morris Professor Dale Jorgenson told the Boskin Commission (created by the senators) that to shave an even one TRiLLION dollars ($1,000,000,000,000) off of social security payments they would merely need to justify an oddly specific 1.1% overstatement in the consumer price index.
 
Which they did. “Somehow”.
 
“Somehow” involved destroying anyone who said “[[CPI]] doesn’t work like that at all! It’s not a number you can dial to get consequences you like.”
 
@Harvard: if you want to have me back, I will debate anyone in your economics department as a former member myself that Harvard Economics frequently has acted as an arm of the USG to bury research or dissenting experts that contradicted the narratives set in DC.
 
We can discuss trade as well as [[Immigration|immigration]].
 
If you were standing for academic independence, I would be shoulder to shoulder with you. But you are disguising the actual relationship between Harvard and the Federal Government where Harvard often academically launders government narratives to push policy objectives down the throats of ordinary Americans as favors to power and DC.
|timestamp=5:47 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912202363752050747
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So how do the big boys play?
 
First: [[Peer Review|Peer review]] before publication is for the little people:
|timestamp=5:52 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
|media1=ERW-X-post-1912202363752050747-GomB6f1WYAAmw0s.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912203731720106227
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Harvard supplied two of the economists.
 
What academic Harvard level methodology did they use to bury us?
 
So: “When in doubt, cut the number by half.”
 
Result: “Billions slipping off the keyboard.”
 
This is in the confession. I’m not making it up.
|timestamp=5:57 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
|media1=ERW-X-post-1912203731720106227-GomDKIyWkAANm4-.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912205502127493148
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Your professors and department joined a hit job that was openly a government special purpose creation to cryptically slash benefits and raise taxes via a back door. The [[CPI]]!
 
“We were a creation of the Senate Finance Committee and especially of the soon to be Disgraced Bob Packwood and … Daniel Moynihan.” I swear it is right there.
 
You destroy those who do actual academic research that gets in the way of Harvard’s special relationship, laundering D.C. power.
|timestamp=6:04 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
|media1=ERW-X-post-1912205502127493148-GomExJeXkAA4Ju-.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912208311308677301
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I would love to discuss this odd relationship you have with academics and power. Specifically:
 
The Theory of Trade</br>
The Theory of Immigration</br>
The Theory Gauged Marginalism</br>
The Theory of Index Construction
 
I assume if this [[Academic Freedom|academic freedom]] is important to you @harvard, you can afford to explore this in a seminar or two with a former member of the @HarvardEcon dept.
 
I can relay then what Professors explained to me at the time about how the real game is played with D.C. to an academic audience.
 
Veritas,
 
Eric
|timestamp=6:16 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
|timestamp=6:34 PM ¡ Apr 15, 2025
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1922247866300707234
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Here is a challenge for any of my colleagues who think this is a [[Nothing Burger|nothingburger]]: given the craziness of the widely discussed and publicized claims in a field that has not seen a change in the Fundamental models of physics in 50 years (!), who are the 25 most prominent physicists and mathematicians who have discussed the @pmarca claims publicly? Nobel laureates? Fields medalists?</br>
Chaired professors worried about the health of science? Top science communicators? PhD level debunkers demanding @pmarca to put up or shut up?
 
In a functional world where scientists are not [[The Precariat|precarious]], it would be a *huge* topic of interest, discussion and '''academic freedom'''. Or it would be debunked. That’s it. There are no other options. Just those two.
 
Please leave your list below with links! 🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1922242777422954949
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A very interesting question is why academics almost uniformly make fun of conspiracy theories…when presented by colleagues at least.
 
Los Alamos, Tuskegee, Human Terrain Systems, etc. all involved conspiracy BY ACADEMICS. Some were good. Some bad. Some ambiguous.
 
But isn’t it odd that conspiracies are a permanent part of human existence, yet trying to study them or theorize about them results in crippling professional penalties?
 
I am astonished that I have not heard one single physicist call @pmarca a liar for claiming the Biden Whitehouse revealed that entire public subfields of theoretical physics were taken off-line by the government for security reasons, and disappeared or went dark.
 
Nor have I heard “We have to look into this!”.</br>
Nor have I heard “Wow! That is super interesting.” Just silence.
 
But what I have heard is academics finding it laughable that others find this is interesting.
 
The @pmarca claim about physics is thus one of the most anti-interesting claims I have ever heard. Everyone in physics just seems to intuitively know not to ask about it.
 
Has anyone seen @michiokaku, @neiltyson, @bgreene etc. commenting on this claim? I haven’t.
 
They all just know: Don’t go there girlfriend.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=tsarnick-profile-PRpYEDXP.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/tsarnick/status/1813393267679240647
|name=Tsarathustra
|usernameurl=https://x.com/tsarnick
|username=tsarnick
|content=Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz say that when they met White House officials to discuss AI, the officials said they could classify any area of math they think is leading in a bad direction to make it a state secret and "it will end"
|media1=tsarnick-X-post-1813393267679240647.jpg
|timestamp=2:00 AM ¡ Jul 16, 2024
}}
|timestamp=10:49 AM ¡ May 13, 2025
}}
|timestamp=11:09 AM ¡ May 13, 2025
}}


== Related Pages ==
== Related Pages ==
Line 1,909: Line 2,116:
* [[Boskin Commission]]
* [[Boskin Commission]]
* [[CPI]]
* [[CPI]]
* [[Free Speech]]
* [[FU Money]]
* [[Horse-and-Rider Problem]]
* [[Horse-and-Rider Problem]]
* [[IMMACT90]]
* [[Immigration]]
* [[Immigration]]
* [[Labor Shortages]]
* [[Labor Shortages]]
* [[Managed Reality TM]]
* [[Managed Reality TM]]
* [[Mansfield Amendment (1969)]]
* [[National Academy of Sciences (NAS)]]
* [[National Science Foundation]]
* [[National Science Foundation]]
* [[Nothing Burger]]
* [[Peer Injunction]]
* [[Peer Injunction]]
* [[Peer Review]]
* [[Peer Review]]
* [[Scientific Method]]
* [[Scientific Method]]
* [[The Precariat]]
* [[Welfare Queens in White Lab Coats]]


[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/23022...24579"