The Portal Wiki

UAP: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

UAP (edit)

Revision as of 06:06, 3 December 2025

14,934 bytes added ,  Wednesday at 06:06
→‎Related Pages
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
== On X ==
== On X ==
=== 2021 ===
=== 2021 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231788667113474
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Enough! Let’s get back to UFOs and space opera so we don’t have to worry about China & Iran making a breakthrough on a white board in some lab we can’t see.
[[Morals|Moral]]: if you take UFOs seriously but not the risk of new physics, you aren’t thinking clearly.
Just think about it. 🙏
|media1=ERW-X-post-1385231788667113474-EzlU-H5VUAcjajt.jpg
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231778135248901
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=At this point, the story I am tracking isn’t “Little Green Men”. It is “Officials inexplicably change course on UFO narrative”.
Also, the story about “Technology never before seen.” Would make more sense with “Technology” replaced by “Physics”.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=eigenbros-profile-PNxXBojm.png
|nameurl=https://x.com/eigenbros/status/1385203376284082180
|name=Eigenbros
|usernameurl=https://x.com/eigenbros
|username=eigenbros
|content=High level government officials have given [[UAP|UAPs]] credibility, but it's still pretty hard for an outsider to analyze the evidence objectively. It's all video footage and testimony. We need much stronger evidence to form any real opinion on UFOs being extraterrestrial or not.
|timestamp=12:06 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231779724861447
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The US/Europe seriously diverted attention from doing real theoretical physics almost 40 years ago in 1984 to explore physics inspired mathematics. Did China/Iran/Russia/Israel? I don’t know.
But I can tell you this: no one in government is appropriately focused on new physics.
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231780446277636
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Imagine in 1900 some “crank” told you about thermonuclear weapons. Would you listen or laugh? Well, they’d be only 5 decades away with no aliens necessary. And powered flight hadn’t happened yet!
That’s how powerful a “new physics” advantage is. We’re behaving like lunatics.
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231781826158593
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Any time ANYONE at least 1/2-way viable says something weird or kooky or interesting (Wolfram, Lisi, etc.) the cost of a Department of Energy 1hr phone call is negligible. Almost no one with that background says anything like this. Maybe less than 1 such PhD “lunatic” per year.
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231782497296384
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Do I think Wolfram, Lisi, Kaku, Smolin, Klee Irwin, Sarfatti, Woit/Penrose etc are right or on the doorstep of new physics? No! But It’s also totally irrelevant to the security risk.
It wouldn’t matter to me at all.  I would check in with all of them: the cost is zero. The risk?
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231783210328071
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The thing I like least about [[Theory of Geometric Unity|Geometric Unity]] is not being able to know what it would unlock if true, any more than Einstein and Bohr understood Lise Meitner, Stan Ulam & Edward Teller’s weaponization of New Physics.
We are talking about UFOs while not worrying about New Physics.
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231783940169734
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Think about the g-2 muon anomaly. Have you heard as much about that suggesting the possibility of New Physics from high precision (rather than high energy) as you have about the TicTac UAP?
Similarly, how often do you hear about [[UAP|UAP technology]] rather than physics issues. Right??
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231784594444288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I have no idea what to make of the change in the [[UAP|UAP narrative]]. What I can tell you with certainty is that for such an ENORMOUS change in the narrative there is no sane explanation for the DOE not to be talking new physics risks and taking every one of the few claims seriously.
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385231785282260993
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As we saw over & over in the 20th century, any small change in physics can change everything almost overnight. From A-Bombs to Semiconductors.
The handful of PhD level claims are of negligible cost to investigate & dismiss compared to a single fighter jet.
DOE lost the plot.
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Apr 22, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 39: Line 164:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This isn’t meant as a dig. I am trying to use your same exactly choice of normative framing that you used to dismiss my fellow inquiring minds in the wake of the UAP report. Happy to remove it if we can get rid of the invective. Thanks.
|content=This isn’t meant as a dig. I am trying to use your same exactly choice of normative framing that you used to dismiss my fellow inquiring minds in the wake of the [[UAP]] report. Happy to remove it if we can get rid of the invective. Thanks.
|timestamp=1:19 AM · Jun 28, 2021
|timestamp=1:19 AM · Jun 28, 2021
}}
}}
Line 45: Line 170:
}}
}}


=== 2024 ===


=== 2024 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1766245545340002643
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=NOTE: Above reference to the work of Prof. Kaiser and to JRE #1945 are included to establish that both were in the public domain, independent, in high levels of agreement, and that there was *ample* time for AARO to investigate these claims which appear not to have any impact.
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 98: Line 231:
CONCLUSION: This report purports to have studied the questions raised surrounding UFO/UAP related research of the US federal Government. It, in fact, appears to have studied a carefully chosen  SUBSET of the claims selected from among those which appear to have mass appeal to the so-called "UFO Community." It completely, or nearly completely, avoided reporting on all questions surrounding issues which have been raised in serious research and by PhD level researchers who have raised scientific questions in this area. This continues the pattern of using PhD level government scientists who appear to avoid the actual research questions most likely to involve sensitve Special Access Programs and Stovepiped Research which are compartmentalized by design. Whether the omissions are due to issues of avoidance, misdirection (e.g. so-called Limited Hangout strategy), ignorance or incompetance cannot be discerned from the information given.
CONCLUSION: This report purports to have studied the questions raised surrounding UFO/UAP related research of the US federal Government. It, in fact, appears to have studied a carefully chosen  SUBSET of the claims selected from among those which appear to have mass appeal to the so-called "UFO Community." It completely, or nearly completely, avoided reporting on all questions surrounding issues which have been raised in serious research and by PhD level researchers who have raised scientific questions in this area. This continues the pattern of using PhD level government scientists who appear to avoid the actual research questions most likely to involve sensitve Special Access Programs and Stovepiped Research which are compartmentalized by design. Whether the omissions are due to issues of avoidance, misdirection (e.g. so-called Limited Hangout strategy), ignorance or incompetance cannot be discerned from the information given.


RECOMMENDATION: It is simply not possible to treat the current AARO report as historically complete or comprehensive. To gain the public trust, the successor to AARO would have to expand and redo this analysis with input from domain professionals who are trusted by the public not to have an apparent agenda or government background (e.g. Prof. David Kaiser of MIT or Dr. Nima Arkani Hamed of IAS, Prof. Brian Keating of UCSD, Avi Loeb of Harvard) Otherwise, it is relatively easy for scientists to '''"Follow the Silence"''' in government reports to see what is *not* being addressed or discussed.
RECOMMENDATION: It is simply not possible to treat the current AARO report as historically complete or comprehensive. To gain the public trust, the successor to AARO would have to expand and redo this analysis with input from domain professionals who are trusted by the public not to have an apparent agenda or government background (e.g. Prof. David Kaiser of MIT or Dr. Nima Arkani Hamed of IAS, Prof. Brian Keating of UCSD, Avi Loeb of Harvard) Otherwise, it is relatively easy for scientists to "[[Follow the Silence]]" in government reports to see what is *not* being addressed or discussed.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1766244211987476587-GIL1a0fa8AA-5bB.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1766244211987476587-GIL1a0fa8AA-5bB.jpg
|quote=
|quote=
Line 115: Line 248:
}}
}}
|timestamp=11:26 PM · Mar 8, 2024
|timestamp=11:26 PM · Mar 8, 2024
}}
|timestamp=11:32 PM · Mar 8, 2024
}}
=== 2025 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1955983961257336938
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I then asked AI to come up with equally meaningless technical terms based on “Interdimensional beings”. Here are the first 50 results:
1. Quantum Nomads</br>
2.Etheric Sentinels</br>
3.Chrono-Weavers</br>
4.Harmonic Architects</br>
5.Phase-Walking Entities</br>
6.Neuro-Aether Collectives</br>
7.Prismatic Wanderers</br>
8.Dreamfield Navigators</br>
9.Celestial Executors</br>
10.Photon Shepherds</br>
11.Metacognitive Guilds</br>
12.Temporal Lattice Keepers</br>
13.Spectral Conservators</br>
14.Luminal Envoys</br>
15.Gravimetric Messengers</br>
16.Pan-Dimensional Heralds</br>
17.Subspace Wardens</br>
18.Chrono-Sovereigns</br>
19.Singularity Whisperers</br>
20.Interstitial Custodians</br>
21.Reality Sculptors</br>
22.Hyperspace Envoys</br>
23.Archetypal Infiltrators</br>
24.Thoughtform Navigators</br>
25.Omniversal Pathfinders</br>
26.Quantum Seers</br>
27.Hyperconscious Collectives</br>
28.Mindwave Pilgrims</br>
29.Scalar Frequency Keepers</br>
30.Eidolon Oracles</br>
31.Astral Cartographers</br>
32.Metatronic Stewards</br>
33.Voidborn Shepherds</br>
34.Causal Horizon Monitors</br>
35.Memetic Wardens</br>
36.Phase Entanglers</br>
37.Pulseborne Architects</br>
38.Resonance Nomads</br>
39.Energy-Field Sentinels</br>
40.Tachyonic Dreamers</br>
41.Infrasonic Voyagers</br>
42.Consciousness Carriers</br>
43.Zero-Point Custodians</br>
44.Orbital Keepers</br>
45.Psychewave Diplomats</br>
46.Entropic Harvesters</br>
47.Lightwoven Inhabitants</br>
48.Chrono-Spiral Navigators</br>
49.Plasmatic Envoys</br>
50.Harmonic Continuum Guardians
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1955983372146368827
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=No. You are correct.
Assume even that beings were using additional hidden dimensions to traverse space and time. You still wouldn’t talk like this. It’s just mental sludge.
I can riff a bunch of equally vapid vibe terms:
“Digital Seraphim”</br>
“Energetic Consciousness”</br>
“Distributed Cognition”</br>
“Disembodied Guardians”</br>
“Plasmic Will”</br>
“Resonance Lifeforms”</br>
“Vibrational Travelers”</br>
“Retrocausal Projectors”</br>
“Trans-Temporal Sentinals”</br>
“Autonomous Vaccum Fauna”
This is just super embarrassing. This is the level of us as a country now.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=TomBilyeu-profile-ceLP2XU6.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/TomBilyeu/status/1955974410143457589
|name=Tom Bilyeu
|usernameurl=https://x.com/TomBilyeu
|username=TomBilyeu
|content=Am I crazy to assume that this is internally facing propaganda rather than actual interdimensional beings?
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=dom_lucre-profile-0IuJtdQa.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/dom_lucre/status/1955770441802338470
|name=Dom Lucre <nowiki>|</nowiki> Breaker of Narratives
|usernameurl=https://x.com/dom_lucre
|username=dom_lucre
|content=đŸ”„đŸššBREAKING NEWS: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just broke the internet after claiming she has seen evidence of "interdimensional beings" with credible people reporting "movement outside of time and space." 
 
"They call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we currently have."
"I can tell you without getting into classified conversations that there have been incidents where very credible people have reported that there have been movements outside of time and space."
This comes after claims of a possible alien invasion in December by Harvard scientist, and several reports of aliens and UAPs in the last 4 years like the incident at the Bayside mall in Miami which has never been fully reported.
Something is coming whether it be real or fake be prepared.
|timestamp=11:16 PM · Aug 13, 2025
}}
|timestamp=12:46 PM · Aug 14, 2025
}}
|timestamp=1:22 PM · Aug 14, 2025
}}
|timestamp=1:24 PM · Aug 14, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1995027443498062188
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Continued
.on the other hand it sure looks like in the 1950s we set up two cut outs and created [[The Golden Age of General Relativity|“The Golden Age Of General Relativity”]].
And then in the wake of [[Howard Morland]] and [[John Aristotle Phillips]], it kinda looks like we stagnated and soft sunsetted real open research in fundamental physics with a preposterous story about [[String Theory]] and [[Quantum Gravity]]. Which makes no sense to anyone honest after 40 years of failure.
So that is pretty odd. Scientists don’t shoot down new ideas for 40 years to protect one known not to work. That isn’t how science works.
So that opens the question, is there a second secret physics program (like a Manhattan Project for Gravity 2.0)  and perhaps a second [[UAP|UFO]] program. A non decoy. And while I see no direct evidence of NHI craft,  we do have a mystery as to why the U.S. would destroy its own commanding advantage in fundamental Physics over string theory and its obvious failure. It just doesn’t pass the laugh test.
The only thing I can wonder about is if we figured a bit of new physics out that lead to new Manhattan Project-level secrecy around all fundamental physics. Maybe 50 high ranking people (e.g. @SecRubio ) aren’t lying with the skill of Pacino and Brando. đŸ€·â€â™€ïž.
Something is way off. We aren’t doing physics in the open any more. And we aren’t asking our own people for help. So you would be crazy not to wonder
WTAF?
This is, unfortunately, consistent with a second Manhattan project on Gravity. This is exactly how secret science works. For example: We stagnated chain reaction research outside los Alamos and continued doing  successful physics inside the compound.
Well, the first part of this is true today. We are dead in the water in university level fundamental physics beyond [[General Relativity|GR]] and the [[Standard Model|SM]]. The second part is unknown. Is there a place where you can get paid to succeed at physics rather than paid to do things which are known not to work? I just don’t know. 
[[Morals|Moral]]: Physics when done well and right, is very very dangerous after all. And I want us to get back to doing physics that will go way beyond [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]].
Even the kind that goes boom:đŸ’„
🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1995027438439395389
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Yes.
I think the US almost certainly has at least one fake UFO program. A decoy.
Think of that decoy as putting out bad information to confuse adversaries. But what does it due to our own scientists?
Now imagine a post relativistic gravitational theory group PRTG here on earth. You would imagine that our own government would be working with that PRTG. Because that group is trying to figure out if we are trapped here, the last thing you want to do is to have the f****ng decoy program polluting our own understanding.
I think the morons in our decoy program forgot to bring in their own PRTGs. Because to a PRTG, [[UAP|UFOs]]
.real NHI craft
.would be key data. And fake craft is just feeding your own scientists poison and polluting their own understanding.
So we don’t have ANY top tier PRTG in this game. That’s what makes me think there is only a [[UAP|fake UFO decoy program]]. OTOH

|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=terracotta_hawk-profile-PXQuk2Ur.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/terracotta_hawk/status/1994956467187921097
|name=Terra
|usernameurl=https://x.com/terracotta_hawk
|username=terracotta_hawk
|content=Can you explain your thoughts a little better?
Have you put any thought into what’s actually going on specifically in the null hypothesis case? What’s this all for? It’s not clear to me at all that there is any sensibility in either direction.
|timestamp=2:27 AM · Nov 30, 2025
}}
|timestamp=7:09 AM · Nov 30, 2025
}}
|timestamp=7:09 AM · Nov 30, 2025
}}
}}


== Related Pages ==
== Related Pages ==


* [[Howard Morland]]
* [[John Aristotle Phillips]]
* [[The Secret History of Anti-Gravity and Quantum Gravity Research]]
* [[UAP=SAP]]
* [[UAP=SAP]]
* [[Quantum Gravity]]
* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]]




[[Category:Portal Topics‏‎]]
[[Category:Portal Topics‏‎]]
[[Category:Physics]]
[[Category:Physics]]
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/23042...24558"