5,984
edits
No edit summary |
 |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
* "We spent almost 80% of this time being told that ST was a 'Piece of 21st Century Physics that fell into the 20th Century.' Uh. Bullshit. That is an excuse. It's not clear that it's physics at all. It's a 'Failed piece of 20th Century Physics still hanging around in the 21stC'." (February 2, 2023).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1621054193426661376 February 2, 2023]</ref> | * "We spent almost 80% of this time being told that ST was a 'Piece of 21st Century Physics that fell into the 20th Century.' Uh. Bullshit. That is an excuse. It's not clear that it's physics at all. It's a 'Failed piece of 20th Century Physics still hanging around in the 21stC'." (February 2, 2023).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1621054193426661376 February 2, 2023]</ref> | ||
* "We need to spend perhaps 5yrs asking 'If the leaders have not succeeded for FIVE DECADES in moving beyond the [Standard Model], then why are they leading this field and directing the resources, research, and path forward? What if we listened to those who the leadership push aside?'" (February 2, 2023).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1621054201957847040 February 2, 2023]</ref> | * "We need to spend perhaps 5yrs asking 'If the leaders have not succeeded for FIVE DECADES in moving beyond the [Standard Model], then why are they leading this field and directing the resources, research, and path forward? What if we listened to those who the leadership push aside?'" (February 2, 2023).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1621054201957847040 February 2, 2023]</ref> | ||
* "And then the massive massive massive screw up was allowing the totalizing madness of [âQuantum Gravityâ] to take over HEP-TH as if it were [[The Only Game in Town|âThe Only Game In Townâ]] and letting its leadership brainwash the up and coming talent into believing that there was one true path. Totally insane." (October 7, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975659241781575728 October 7, 2025]</ref> | * "And then the massive massive massive screw up was allowing the totalizing madness of [âQuantum Gravityâ] to take over HEP-TH as if it were [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âThe Only Game In Townâ]] and letting its leadership brainwash the up and coming talent into believing that there was one true path. Totally insane." (October 7, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975659241781575728 October 7, 2025]</ref> | ||
He calls for reforms: "Iâd propose total reassessment of the National Physics program. Much greater autonomy for theorists. *Much* higher salaries. Much greater *diversity* of approaches. More high precision work. Fewer graduate programs. Physics = economic/security priority. Admit [[String Theory|String Thy]] failure." (April 22, 2021).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385263862698577922 April 22, 2021]</ref> | He calls for reforms: "Iâd propose total reassessment of the National Physics program. Much greater autonomy for theorists. *Much* higher salaries. Much greater *diversity* of approaches. More high precision work. Fewer graduate programs. Physics = economic/security priority. Admit [[String Theory|String Thy]] failure." (April 22, 2021).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1385263862698577922 April 22, 2021]</ref> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* "[String Theory] isnât the problem. String culture is poisonous to science. String theory, like love, means never having to say your sorry. Or mistaken." (August 24, 2022).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1562465038962610178 August 24, 2022]</ref> | * "[String Theory] isnât the problem. String culture is poisonous to science. String theory, like love, means never having to say your sorry. Or mistaken." (August 24, 2022).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1562465038962610178 August 24, 2022]</ref> | ||
* "The issue is the âString Theory is the only game in townâ which appears designed to destroy fundamental physics itself... The defining feature of String Theory is that it would rather fundamental physics die than that String Theory face healthy adult rivals that were not maimed, crippled, stolen, or murdered in their cribs." (April 15, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912032953896673603 April 15, 2025]</ref> | * "The issue is the âString Theory is the only game in townâ which appears designed to destroy fundamental physics itself... The defining feature of String Theory is that it would rather fundamental physics die than that String Theory face healthy adult rivals that were not maimed, crippled, stolen, or murdered in their cribs." (April 15, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1912032953896673603 April 15, 2025]</ref> | ||
* "The appearance of [[String Theory|String-Theory/M-theory]] as [[The Only Game in Town|âThe Only Game in Townâ (TOGIT)]] has no precedence... The rivals never got heard." (August 16, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1956769068188594232 August 16, 2025]</ref> | * "The appearance of [[String Theory|String-Theory/M-theory]] as [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âThe Only Game in Townâ (TOGIT)]] has no precedence... The rivals never got heard." (August 16, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1956769068188594232 August 16, 2025]</ref> | ||
* "Congratulations to: @thebadstats @daveexplains @GurusPod @IAmTimNguyen / @Google @Samuel_Gregson @C_Kavanagh @ArthurCDent @kagankans / @WSJ You just showed the world why Quantum Gravity/StringTheory/M-Theory is âThe Only Game in Townâ: Group Bullying * kills* Scientific Dissent" (September 17, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1968365361382002922 September 17, 2025]</ref> | * "Congratulations to: @thebadstats @daveexplains @GurusPod @IAmTimNguyen / @Google @Samuel_Gregson @C_Kavanagh @ArthurCDent @kagankans / @WSJ You just showed the world why Quantum Gravity/StringTheory/M-Theory is âThe Only Game in Townâ: Group Bullying * kills* Scientific Dissent" (September 17, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1968365361382002922 September 17, 2025]</ref> | ||
* "Right Freeway: GR and SM must be harmonized. Wrong Exit: Catastrophic leadership decisions. âGravity must be quantized and only String Theory and M-Theory can do it. Convert or perish! All mere mortals stand back. We will have this wrapped up in 10 years!! Give us all resources and young talent now.â" (October 7, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975659241781575728 October 7, 2025]</ref> | * "Right Freeway: GR and SM must be harmonized. Wrong Exit: Catastrophic leadership decisions. âGravity must be quantized and only String Theory and M-Theory can do it. Convert or perish! All mere mortals stand back. We will have this wrapped up in 10 years!! Give us all resources and young talent now.â" (October 7, 2025).<ref>[https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1975659241781575728 October 7, 2025]</ref> | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
Given, y'know, the absence of such a thy. | Given, y'know, the absence of such a thy. | ||
|timestamp=6:02 PM ¡ Aug 21, 2016 | |timestamp=6:02 PM ¡ Aug 21, 2016 | ||
}} | |||
=== 2018 === | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958045232150425600 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=END/ My bet is on Type III for a reason: | |||
Type I is not unified.</br> | |||
Type II is possible, but appears to be unworkable in details.</br> | |||
Type IV appears to lack sufficient guidance from Quantum theory to actually 'ship' despite consuming resources for yrs.</br> | |||
Types V & VI lack any progress. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958021546718633984 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=1/ "Theories of Everything": A Taxonomy. | |||
It is often said that "Theories-of-Everything are a dime a dozen" or that "All theoretical physicists worth their salt have several in a drawer." So far as I can tell, this is simply untrue. We've barely ever, if at all, seen candidates. | |||
|timestamp=4:58 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-958021546718633984-DUuQCV3UMAAmV4G.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958022612390563842 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=2/ The Escher Lithograph used in the first tweet points to the core of why TOEs are rare. A candidate TOE has to have some quality of "a fire that lights itself", which is difficult to think about beyond the equations that would instantiate it. Hence very few such theories exist. | |||
|timestamp=5:02 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958026235736567808 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=3/ I'm going to lean on the following dictionary of analogies: | |||
Physical Paper = Void | |||
Pictured Canvas = Manifold and/or Einsteinian Spacetime | |||
Ink=Matter & non-gravitational force fields | |||
Pencils = Pre-Conscious Lego (e.g. amino acids) | |||
Hands = Consciousness | |||
Paradox = Self-awareness | |||
|timestamp=5:17 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958028114180714496 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=4/ In my taxonomy, Type I TOEs are our least ambitious but they best match our state of the world. They are distinguished by two *separate* sources of origin: one for the Canvas ([[General Relativity]] or [[Ed Witten|Witten's]] point i) ) & one for the Ink ([[Standard Model]] or [[Ed Witten|Witten's]] point ii) ). | |||
|timestamp=5:24 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-928296366853328896-DOE8P81U8AA_MBe.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958032334346862592 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=5 Type II TOE's are more ambitious & seek to derive the Ink from the choice of a mathematically distinguished Canvas that is anything but blank. My arch-nemesis @garrettlisi's theory is Type II. E8 is his 248 dimensional canvas. The intricacy is there, but doesn't quite match up. | |||
|timestamp=5:41 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-958032334346862592-DUucltrVoAAvF2u.jpg | |||
|media2=ERW-X-post-958032334346862592-DUucnc5VAAAtoC1.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958034414167982080 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=6/ In Type III TOEs the ink is to be derived from canvas, but the canvas is essentially blank; it simply permits mathematics to happen (e.g. calculus and linear algebra). In such theories the ink has to be bootstrapped into existence. My lectures on [[Theory of Geometric Unity|Geometric Unity]] were Type III. | |||
|timestamp=5:49 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-958034414167982080-DUufH-dVAAAD8jD.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958037099457871872 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=7/ Type IV TOE's try to change the question from Einstein's "Unified Field Theory." In [[String Theory|String Thy]], [[Quantum Gravity|"Quantizing Gravity"]] became substituted for "Unified Field." For this crowd, many are now betting that the canvas & ink are both *emergent* from some deeper fundamental quantum thy. | |||
|timestamp=6:00 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-958037099457871872-DUuhS VVMAA3FyW.jpg | |||
|media2=ERW-X-post-958037099457871872-DUuhXHwUQAAEICu.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958039046239928320 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=8/ Type V TOEs are of a type I've never been able to fully contemplate; they are without boundaries or origins. There is no "Why is there something rather than nothing" within them. That which is not forbidden is compelled into existence. Void creates canvas & canvas begets void. | |||
|timestamp=6:08 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958041865386827776 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=9/ Type VI TOEs begin with the hands. Religions are of this type. I pass over this in silence as they aren't scientific. | |||
I will leave open higher types, but I've really only seen attempts at I-IV & I wouldn't call [[String Theory|String-Thy/M-Thy]] a full TOE try since events of the last 15 yrs. | |||
|timestamp=6:19 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/958043587349901312 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=10/ I believe fundamental physics is stalled out because we are finally at the doorstep of a TOE and we haven't really bothered to think about what that would actually mean because we've never been here before. A final step need not look like any previous one. In fact, it cannot. | |||
|timestamp=6:26 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=6:32 PM ¡ Jan 29, 2018 | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 421: | Line 547: | ||
|timestamp=5:52 PM ¡ Oct 10, 2022 | |timestamp=5:52 PM ¡ Oct 10, 2022 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/ | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1589648310104883202 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=@ | |content=@nathan_garner_ âThe right side has been quantized. The left side is geometric, but has not yet been quantized. Ergo, the left side *must* also be quantized for equality with the right side to hold. QED.â | ||
 | |||
70 years of abject failure are hard to sum up as you ask. But that is the core argument. https://t.co/HOE9sOgTmI | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1589648310104883202-Fg-QtpVUoAAvIeJ.jpg | |||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 452: | Line 582: | ||
It is, by now, too big to fail. It is not even the elephant in the room. Itâs the blue whale in physicsâ linen closet. | It is, by now, too big to fail. It is not even the elephant in the room. Itâs the blue whale in physicsâ linen closet. | ||
|timestamp=3:42 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | |timestamp=3:42 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | ||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=dingobabyboy-profile-kdwnk0Ej.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/dingobabyboy/status/1589645752720314368 | |||
|name=formerlyknownasdingobabyâĄď¸ | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/dingobabyboy | |||
|username=dingobabyboy | |||
|content=String theory | |||
|timestamp=3:47 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 462: | Line 601: | ||
|timestamp=3:48 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | |timestamp=3:48 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|timestamp= | {{Tweet | ||
|image=nathangarner0-profile-705GFNVO.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/nathangarner0/status/1589641263078572033 | |||
|name=Nathan | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/nathangarner0 | |||
|username=nathangarner0 | |||
|content=Could you sum up quantum gravity in two sentences? Idk what to believe because Iâm not close to the physics, so whatâs your take and why? | |||
|timestamp=3:29 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=3:57 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 533: | Line 681: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=It is tied to all sorts of weirdness involving top physics and math people, bizarre funders, forgotten research institutes, aerospace companies, post Manhattan Project government secrecy, the golden age of General Relativity andâŚwords fail meâŚoutright quackery. | |content=It is tied to all sorts of weirdness involving top physics and math people, bizarre funders, forgotten research institutes, aerospace companies, post Manhattan Project government secrecy, [[The Golden Age of General Relativity|the golden age of General Relativity]] andâŚwords fail meâŚoutright quackery. | ||
|timestamp=5:13 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | |timestamp=5:13 PM ¡ Nov 7, 2022 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 673: | Line 821: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Either way, itâs a big deal. Everything changed in the early 70s. Itâs impossible to say how much. The moment the Mansfield amendment came in, physics began to stagnate. And [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] destroyed our culture of science. We donât even whisper about its âAnti-Gravityâ origin. | |content=Either way, itâs a big deal. Everything changed in the early 70s. Itâs impossible to say how much. The moment the [[Mansfield Amendment (1969)|Mansfield amendment]] came in, physics began to stagnate. And [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] destroyed our culture of science. We donât even whisper about its âAnti-Gravityâ origin. | ||
|timestamp=4:13 PM ¡ Nov 10, 2022 | |timestamp=4:13 PM ¡ Nov 10, 2022 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 2,742: | Line 2,890: | ||
Woit is an excellent example of someone who was told he was barren when he was a pure critic...only to then be told he was a self-promoter when he had something to say about the structure bundle of CP^3 being potentially the low energy electro strong SU(3)xU(1) and the oddity of the chirality of the weak force being either fully on or off rather than merely conjugate V vs \bar{V}. | Woit is an excellent example of someone who was told he was barren when he was a pure critic...only to then be told he was a self-promoter when he had something to say about the structure bundle of CP^3 being potentially the low energy electro strong SU(3)xU(1) and the oddity of the chirality of the weak force being either fully on or off rather than merely conjugate V vs \bar{V}. | ||
It's time to stop pretending this is about physics. It's about protecting a 4 decade MASSIVE screw up pretending that there is [[The Only Game in Town|only one game in town]]. | It's time to stop pretending this is about physics. It's about protecting a 4 decade MASSIVE screw up pretending that there is [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|only one game in town]]. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 2,925: | Line 3,073: | ||
Senior physicists | Senior physicists | ||
[[The Only Game in Town|The âOnly Game in Town!â monopoly]] | [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|The âOnly Game in Town!â monopoly]] | ||
@pmarcaâs WH convo | @pmarcaâs WH convo | ||
| Line 3,055: | Line 3,203: | ||
So even when their team loses on the field, they still win by referees decision that they are the only real team competing. Everyone else focuses on whether they have background independence, particle predictions or a renormalizable spin 2 quantization. That is a total red herring.  | So even when their team loses on the field, they still win by referees decision that they are the only real team competing. Everyone else focuses on whether they have background independence, particle predictions or a renormalizable spin 2 quantization. That is a total red herring.  | ||
Sabine: Theoretical physics isnât this dumb or anti-scientific. Itâs impossible. [[The Only Game in Town|âThe only game in townâ]] campaign is not a [[String Theory|string theoretic]] idea. It is totally foreign to science. | Sabine: Theoretical physics isnât this dumb or anti-scientific. Itâs impossible. [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âThe only game in townâ]] campaign is not a [[String Theory|string theoretic]] idea. It is totally foreign to science. | ||
Something separate doesnât want rival theories side by side. In a science we would all be expected to listen to each other. This is what my first memories of physics looked like 1983-1988. There were different ideas. Nothing like this. | Something separate doesnât want rival theories side by side. In a science we would all be expected to listen to each other. This is what my first memories of physics looked like 1983-1988. There were different ideas. Nothing like this. | ||
| Line 3,090: | Line 3,238: | ||
|content=The issue isnât [[String Theory]] which has obviously failed in the terms it set for itself. Â | |content=The issue isnât [[String Theory]] which has obviously failed in the terms it set for itself. Â | ||
The issue is the [[The Only Game in Town|âString Theory is the only game in townâ]] which appears designed to destroy fundamental physics itself. If you have spent 40 years bragging and failing, wouldnât you at least ask âDoesnât anyone have any other ideas?â before finally going over the edge of the cliff? Â | The issue is the [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âString Theory is the only game in townâ]] which appears designed to destroy fundamental physics itself. If you have spent 40 years bragging and failing, wouldnât you at least ask âDoesnât anyone have any other ideas?â before finally going over the edge of the cliff? Â | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Absolutely* not. And that tells you that string theory isnât a theory. Itâs some kind of a suicide pact. Better that the field die than we ask âWhat if the string theorists were always wrong including pronouncements about [[Quantum Gravity|quantum gravity]] and against other theorists? What if [[The Only Game in Town|âthe only game in townâ]] was always an obviously totally unethical anti-scientific move to destroy and poison the market place of ideas?â | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Absolutely* not. And that tells you that string theory isnât a theory. Itâs some kind of a suicide pact. Better that the field die than we ask âWhat if the string theorists were always wrong including pronouncements about [[Quantum Gravity|quantum gravity]] and against other theorists? What if [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âthe only game in townâ]] was always an obviously totally unethical anti-scientific move to destroy and poison the market place of ideas?â | ||
cc: @bgreene. | cc: @bgreene. | ||
| Line 3,474: | Line 3,622: | ||
âWe may be faking a [[Quantum Gravity]] revolution.â | âWe may be faking a [[Quantum Gravity]] revolution.â | ||
âWe may be lying that [[The Only Game in Town|all the competitors to String theory are all bad science or PseudoScience]].â | âWe may be lying that [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|all the competitors to String theory are all bad science or PseudoScience]].â | ||
You want to go short Michael? Give me the generous odds that come from your study of conspiracy theorists. Â | You want to go short Michael? Give me the generous odds that come from your study of conspiracy theorists. Â | ||
| Line 3,523: | Line 3,671: | ||
No hard feelings. | No hard feelings. | ||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=michaelshermer-profile.jpg | |image=michaelshermer-profile.jpg | ||
| Line 3,990: | Line 4,139: | ||
|content=Here is one in theoretical physics dear @grok. | |content=Here is one in theoretical physics dear @grok. | ||
In order to justify the failure that is [[Quantum Gravity]] research and its claim to be [[The Only Game in Town|the only game in town]]. All physicists are expected to parrot a party line: Â | In order to justify the failure that is [[Quantum Gravity]] research and its claim to be [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|the only game in town]]. All physicists are expected to parrot a party line: Â | ||
âOur two greatest theories are [[General Relativity]] which dominates in the very large, and the Standard Model which dominates in the world of the very small. Unfortunately, they are incompatible because one is a quantum theory while the other is merely classical. That is why, for the last 100 years, a theory of [[Quantum Gravity|quantum gravity (QG)]] has been seen as the holy grail of theoretical physics. Unfortunately despite a century of effort, no one has shown exactly how to quantize gravity. But quantizing gravity must occur because nature cannot be half classical and half quantum. So the ultimate theory of QG remains physicsâ top priority.â | âOur two greatest theories are [[General Relativity]] which dominates in the very large, and the Standard Model which dominates in the world of the very small. Unfortunately, they are incompatible because one is a quantum theory while the other is merely classical. That is why, for the last 100 years, a theory of [[Quantum Gravity|quantum gravity (QG)]] has been seen as the holy grail of theoretical physics. Unfortunately despite a century of effort, no one has shown exactly how to quantize gravity. But quantizing gravity must occur because nature cannot be half classical and half quantum. So the ultimate theory of QG remains physicsâ top priority.â | ||
| Line 4,418: | Line 4,567: | ||
We have the same thing in Economics. Dale Jorgensen was a [[Knarc|Cnark]]. He was also chairman of the Harvard Economics Deparment. | We have the same thing in Economics. Dale Jorgensen was a [[Knarc|Cnark]]. He was also chairman of the Harvard Economics Deparment. | ||
We have this in physics with the [[Quantum Gravity]] crowd. The [[The Only Game in Town|âWe are the only game in town.â]] is the tell. Itâs transparent. Â | We have this in physics with the [[Quantum Gravity]] crowd. The [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âWe are the only game in town.â]] is the tell. Itâs transparent. Â | ||
We had it at the Lancet and Nature with the woke shaming on racism (covid origins) and transphobia (gender re-definition). Â | We had it at the Lancet and Nature with the woke shaming on racism (covid origins) and transphobia (gender re-definition). Â | ||
| Line 4,541: | Line 4,690: | ||
|content=Respectfully. Here is what I think is going on. Â | |content=Respectfully. Here is what I think is going on. Â | ||
I) Independent breakthrough science is in a long wind down starting with the Mansfield amendment, and is being partially decommissioned. Why? Because it was found to be too powerful and redistributive. | I) Independent breakthrough science is in a long wind down starting with the [[Mansfield Amendment (1969)|Mansfield amendment]], and is being partially decommissioned. Why? Because it was found to be too powerful and redistributive. | ||
II) The National Security and National Interest folks now use science, journalism, academe etc to dump their cognitive sludge. Epstein cover stories, UAP cover stories, Assasination cover stories, COVID cover stories, Inflation/Money Supply cover stories, etc. That is, the organs that kept us partially free in 1975 are now used to attack our ability to think, every day of our lives.  | II) The National Security and National Interest folks now use science, journalism, academe etc to dump their cognitive sludge. [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]] cover stories, [[UAP|UAP cover stories]], Assasination cover stories, COVID cover stories, Inflation/Money Supply cover stories, etc. That is, the organs that kept us partially free in 1975 are now used to attack our ability to think, every day of our lives.  | ||
III) Anyone not going along with I) and II) sticks out like an absolute sore thumb and is targeted for âImage Cheapeningâ. This is abhorrent abuse of power. Â | III) Anyone not going along with I) and II) sticks out like an absolute sore thumb and is targeted for [[Image Cheapening|âImage Cheapeningâ]]. This is abhorrent abuse of power. Â | ||
IV) @RepLuna isnât stupid. If she can talk about Physical Law and âInterdimensional beingsâ, she can place a phone call or two to our physicists or differential geometers/topologists. Iâm happy to help direct her to good folks. | IV) @RepLuna isnât stupid. If she can talk about Physical Law and âInterdimensional beingsâ, she can place a phone call or two to our physicists or differential geometers/topologists. Iâm happy to help direct her to good folks. | ||
V) The UFO community is way too recreational. What ever is hidden behind the UAP curtain is serious business. It involved high level physics as recently as 50 years ago. Then that connection got buried. I just donât know what this about. And I have *zero* proof it involves aliens or interdimensional beings. Â | V) The [[UAP|UFO]] community is way too recreational. What ever is hidden behind the [[UAP]] curtain is serious business. It involved high level physics as recently as 50 years ago. Then that connection got buried. I just donât know what this about. And I have *zero* proof it involves aliens or interdimensional beings. Â | ||
VI) Adults who would never discuss the Tooth Fairy in public should not discuss alien equivalents of the Tooth Fairy. Alien life and higher dimensions are both super serious subjects to me. And they would be too you too if this wasnât made into a cheap farce. Space opera is just dumping cognitive sludge in the middle of a central scientific question. And I donât take kindly to it. Â | VI) Adults who would never discuss the Tooth Fairy in public should not discuss alien equivalents of the Tooth Fairy. Alien life and higher dimensions are both super serious subjects to me. And they would be too you too if this wasnât made into a cheap farce. Space opera is just dumping cognitive sludge in the middle of a central scientific question. And I donât take kindly to it. Â | ||
VII) I personally believe there are 4+6=10 =(d**2 + d)/2 for d=1+3 additional dimensions available for travel. But that would make **US**âŚ.humansâŚ.just as interdimensional as alien life. And we donât evaluate any such ideas for our own travel. We just run out the clock listening to decades of the same 20 Octogenarians and Septuagenarians discussing how they are going to solve [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] when they grow up. And we let them destroy all competitors so they can take down the field of theoretical physics and die in piece pretending they were the [[The Only Game in Town|âOnly Game In Townâ]]. Which is total pure unadulterated anti-scientific bullshit. Think about it.  | VII) I personally believe there are 4+6=10 =(d**2 + d)/2 for d=1+3 additional dimensions available for travel. But that would make **US**âŚ.humansâŚ.just as interdimensional as alien life. And we donât evaluate any such ideas for our own travel. We just run out the clock listening to decades of the same 20 Octogenarians and Septuagenarians discussing how they are going to solve [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] when they grow up. And we let them destroy all competitors so they can take down the field of theoretical physics and die in piece pretending they were the [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âOnly Game In Townâ]]. Which is total pure unadulterated anti-scientific bullshit. Think about it.  | ||
VIII) Nobody but nobody is this dumb. Not even the government on its worst day. This is national security cognitive sludge being dumped into science. We are 40+ years into a string theory fairy tale about [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] without asking âIs this all bullshit?â | VIII) Nobody but nobody is this dumb. Not even the government on its worst day. This is national security cognitive sludge being dumped into science. We are 40+ years into a string theory fairy tale about [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] without asking âIs this all bullshit?â | ||
IX) Science needs to be in a dialogue with NatSec. And it needs to tell them to play nice and cut it out or we use our vast tools to figure out what is going on because this COVID level bullshit is too dumb to be believed. We are just one or two rogue billionaires away from being able to immunize our scientists from USG cutting off all funds and destroying their reputations. Breakaway science in the public interest. It can take as few as one personal fortune in the service of science to cure this. Just one. This whole post-WWII | IX) Science needs to be in a dialogue with NatSec. And it needs to tell them to play nice and cut it out or we use our vast tools to figure out what is going on because this COVID level bullshit is too dumb to be believed. We are just one or two rogue billionaires away from being able to immunize our scientists from USG cutting off all funds and destroying their reputations. Breakaway science in the public interest. It can take as few as one personal fortune in the service of science to cure this. Just one. This whole post-WWII | ||
system of journals, | system of journals, peer review, grants, gatekeepers etc in fields like physics, economics and math is entirely vulnerable. We need to own  | ||
X) Lying about COVID and UAP is a modified NIMBY issue for all scientists: Not in our back yard(s). Iâm just tired of scientists and technical folks being fed cognitive sludge by NatSec and national interest types we canât see. Interdimensional or otherwise. | X) Lying about COVID and UAP is a modified NIMBY issue for all scientists: Not in our back yard(s). Iâm just tired of scientists and technical folks being fed cognitive sludge by NatSec and national interest types we canât see. Interdimensional or otherwise. | ||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Onuora-profile-5mx-MBmV.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/Onuora/status/1956019859382526085 | |||
|name=Onuora Amobi | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Onuora | |||
|username=Onuora | |||
|content=Iâm a big fan of yours. | |||
But isnât it a little much to expect a politician to not speak plainly on a podcast but use âscientifically preciseâ terms? | |||
Regarding the propaganda element of all this, hereâs what I believe. The level of discourse recently about UAPâs and potential alien activity is refreshing whether or not itâs murky. | |||
The fact that we have Government officials going on record to validate that SOMETHING is out there is progress. | |||
Compared to a decade ago where people were demonized and destroyed for even speaking out about this, I see progress. | |||
Respectfully. đđ˝ | |||
|timestamp=3:47 PM ¡ Aug 14, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=11:11 PM ¡ Aug 14, 2025 | |timestamp=11:11 PM ¡ Aug 14, 2025 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 4,655: | Line 4,824: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=Wow @grok. That was like just before [[String Theory]] took over, and the field suddenly veered to studying the [[The Only Game in Town|âOnly Game In Townâ]]. Â | |content=Wow @grok. That was like just before [[String Theory]] took over, and the field suddenly veered to studying the [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âOnly Game In Townâ]]. Â | ||
Sounds like the USG had a problem with a âStreisand Effectâ before it was called that. Am I just wrong about this? | Sounds like the USG had a problem with a âStreisand Effectâ before it was called that. Am I just wrong about this? | ||
| Line 4,778: | Line 4,947: | ||
|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok. Â | |content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok. Â | ||
Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town|âThe Only Game in Townâ (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that canât make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT? Â | Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âThe Only Game in Townâ (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that canât make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT? Â | ||
That doesnât make any sense to me. Why arenât we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking âWe have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why arenât we asking if anyone *else* has crazy ideas that arenât [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?â | That doesnât make any sense to me. Why arenât we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking âWe have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why arenât we asking if anyone *else* has crazy ideas that arenât [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?â | ||
| Line 5,459: | Line 5,628: | ||
@kagankans / @WSJ | @kagankans / @WSJ | ||
You just showed the world why [[Quantum Gravity]]/[[String Theory|StringTheory/M-Theory]] is [[The Only Game in Town|âThe Only Game in Townâ]]: | You just showed the world why [[Quantum Gravity]]/[[String Theory|StringTheory/M-Theory]] is [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âThe Only Game in Townâ]]: | ||
Group Bullying *Kills* Scientific Dissent | Group Bullying *Kills* Scientific Dissent | ||
| Line 6,063: | Line 6,232: | ||
[[Right Freeway, Wrong Exit|Wrong Exit]] (Spacetime SUSY with fake super partners which dont exist based on supposedlu âinternalâ auxiliary symmetries) | [[Right Freeway, Wrong Exit|Wrong Exit]] (Spacetime SUSY with fake super partners which dont exist based on supposedlu âinternalâ auxiliary symmetries) | ||
III) And then the massive massive massive screw up was allowing the totalizing madness of [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] to take over HEP-TH as if it were [[The Only Game in Town|âThe Only Game In Townâ]] and letting its leadership brainwash the up and coming talent into believing that there was one true path. Totally insane. | III) And then the massive massive massive screw up was allowing the totalizing madness of [[Quantum Gravity|âQuantum Gravityâ]] to take over HEP-TH as if it were [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)|âThe Only Game In Townâ]] and letting its leadership brainwash the up and coming talent into believing that there was one true path. Totally insane. | ||
[[Right Freeway, Wrong Exit|Right Freeway]]: GR and SM must be harmonized.</br> Â | [[Right Freeway, Wrong Exit|Right Freeway]]: GR and SM must be harmonized.</br> Â | ||
| Line 6,130: | Line 6,299: | ||
* [[Standard Model]] | * [[Standard Model]] | ||
* [[String Theory]] | * [[String Theory]] | ||
* [[The Only Game in Town]] | * [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)]] | ||
* [[The Secret History of Anti-Gravity and Quantum Gravity Research]] | |||
* [[Theory of Geometric Unity]] | * [[Theory of Geometric Unity]] | ||
* [[Twin Nuclei Problem]] | * [[Twin Nuclei Problem]] | ||