The Portal Wiki

The Precariat: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

The Precariat (edit)

Revision as of 03:18, 30 November 2025

5,690 bytes added ,  Sunday at 03:18
→‎Related Pages
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 154: Line 154:
== More On X ==
== More On X ==
=== 2022 ===
=== 2022 ===
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 162: Line 163:
|content=I spent a lot of time in beautiful homes and second homes of older research scientists as a grad student.
|content=I spent a lot of time in beautiful homes and second homes of older research scientists as a grad student.


We should be embarrassed how far into '''precariousness''' we pushed Generation X & Millennials. Our entire economy is now bet on bargain science provided way below market.#Enough
We should be embarrassed how far into [[The Precariat|precariousness]] we pushed Generation X & Millennials. Our entire economy is now bet on bargain science provided way below market.#Enough
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1490949894076469249
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Keep your mouth shut or lose job security.
 
Sometimes @skdh drives me nuts. Usually, it’s in a good way. Can no one  with money or power fix this situation? No? Of course not. You want science slaves. How’s that working in virology?
 
Somebody get our scientists wealth & [[Academic Freedom|freedom]].
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=skdh-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/skdh/status/1490945304438345728
|name=Sabine Hossenfelder
|usernameurl=https://x.com/skdh
|username=skdh
|content=Of course the vast majority of people who work in the foundations of physics want me to stop pointing out they are working on pseudoscience. Of course I know that this means I will never get a permanent position.
|timestamp=7:07 AM · Feb 8, 2022
}}
|timestamp=7:25 AM · Feb 8, 2022
}}
|timestamp=7:31 AM · Feb 8, 2022
|timestamp=7:31 AM · Feb 8, 2022
}}
}}
Line 179: Line 204:
|media1=ERW-X-post-1495056251004370945-FL-BvG4XIAMBRIF.jpg
|media1=ERW-X-post-1495056251004370945-FL-BvG4XIAMBRIF.jpg
}}
}}


=== 2023 ===
=== 2023 ===
Line 325: Line 349:
G) Graduate students are workers disguised as students. Foreign students are a foreign workforce.  
G) Graduate students are workers disguised as students. Foreign students are a foreign workforce.  


H) Peer review is astonishingly recent and doesn’t work.  
H) [[Peer Review|Peer review]] is astonishingly recent and doesn’t work.  


I) There is a quasi military function to research universities. They are part of National Security. Patriotism matters.
I) There is a quasi military function to research universities. They are part of National Security. Patriotism matters.
Line 334: Line 358:
Machine learning leap to mind. This must be studied.  
Machine learning leap to mind. This must be studied.  


L) The AAU, NSF, NAS etc. have all conspired against the welfare of American scientists and their families. Scientists need to be in the rooms where their fates are determined.  
L) The AAU, [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]], [[National Academy of Sciences (NAS)|NAS]] etc. have all conspired against the welfare of American scientists and their families. Scientists need to be in the rooms where their fates are determined.  


M) The difference between a research university and a college takes place almost exclusively within three groups of people: Professors, Graduate Students, and PostDocs/Researchers/Visitors. It often takes place in the afternoons. In seminars. In Labs. Etc. If you aren’t part of that world you aren’t part of the University. You are working or studying in BigEd but not involved with the university itself.
M) The difference between a research university and a college takes place almost exclusively within three groups of people: Professors, Graduate Students, and PostDocs/Researchers/Visitors. It often takes place in the afternoons. In seminars. In Labs. Etc. If you aren’t part of that world you aren’t part of the University. You are working or studying in BigEd but not involved with the university itself.
Line 340: Line 364:
N) The great man/woman theory is basically correct in academics. Individual academicians change the world.  
N) The great man/woman theory is basically correct in academics. Individual academicians change the world.  


O) The Mansfield amendment, Dole-Bayh, Eilberg, IMMACT90 etc laws need to be undone. The damage has been incalculable.
O) The [[Mansfield Amendment (1969)|Mansfield amendment]], [[Bayh-Dole Act (1980)|Dole-Bayh]], [[Eilberg Amendment (1976)|Eilberg]], [[IMMACT90]] etc laws need to be undone. The damage has been incalculable.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=sfmcguire79-profile-FzUJV2Yy.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/sfmcguire79/status/1894469745946021940
|name=Steve McGuire
|usernameurl=https://x.com/sfmcguire79
|username=sfmcguire79
|content=Full page ad in today’s WSJ taken out by leaders at @VanderbiltU and @WashU:
 
Higher Education is at a Crossroads
 
To university leadership, Board members and alumni:
 
American higher education is at a crossroads. Ideological forces in and outside of campuses have pulled too many universities away from the core purpose, principles and values that made them America's great engines of learning, innovation and discovery, and the envy of the world.
 
It is imperative that universities reaffirm and protect these core principles, strengthen their compact with the American people, and build on their unmatched capacity for teaching and innovation. They must do so not only because universities provide education that is transformative and research that improves everyday life—but also because their work is vital to American prosperity, competitiveness and national security.
 
To this end, the leadership of Vanderbilt University and Washington University in St. Louis recently took action at the board level to affirm our commitment to three indispensable principles that have long guided us:
 
-Excellence in all aspects of our institutions' work, free of political litmus tests, grounded in a commitment to institutional neutrality in words and deeds;
 
-Academic freedom and freedom of expression, to ensure unfettered inquiry, perspectives drawn from a wide range of human experience, and dialogue and debate that are free from censorship and disruption; and
 
-An environment that fosters growth and development, including a commitment to minimizing financial and other barriers that impede students' access to our institutions or that hinder their academic success.
 
Learn about the Vanderbilt-WashU Statement of Principles and efforts to restore confidence in America's great universities at HigherEdStatementofPrinciples dot com
 
Bruce Evans</br>
Chairman, Board of Trust</br>
Vanderbilt University
 
Andrew Bursky</br>
Chair, Board of Trustees Washington University in St. Louis
 
Daniel Diermeier</br>
Chancellor</br>
Vanderbilt University
 
Andrew D. Martin</br>
Chancellor</br>
Washington University in St. Louis
|media1=sfmcguire79-X-post-1894469745946021940-GkqCMUbX0AAbPNZ.jpg
|timestamp=7:29 PM · Feb 25, 2025
}}
|timestamp=7:27 PM · Feb 26, 2025
|timestamp=7:27 PM · Feb 26, 2025
}}
}}
Line 376: Line 444:
|timestamp=1:28 PM · Apr 11, 2025
|timestamp=1:28 PM · Apr 11, 2025
}}
}}




Line 384: Line 453:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Here is a challenge for any of my colleagues who think this is a nothingburger: given the craziness of the widely discussed and publicized claims in a field that has not seen a change in the Fundamental models of physics in 50 years (!), who are the 25 most prominent physicists and mathematicians who have discussed the @pmarca claims publicly? Nobel laureates? Fields medalists?  
|content=Here is a challenge for any of my colleagues who think this is a [[Nothing Burger|nothingburger]]: given the craziness of the widely discussed and publicized claims in a field that has not seen a change in the Fundamental models of physics in 50 years (!), who are the 25 most prominent physicists and mathematicians who have discussed the @pmarca claims publicly? Nobel laureates? Fields medalists?</br>
Chaired professors worried about the health of science? Top science communicators? PhD level debunkers demanding @pmarca to put up or shut up?
Chaired professors worried about the health of science? Top science communicators? PhD level debunkers demanding @pmarca to put up or shut up?


In a functional world where scientists are not '''precarious''', it would be a *huge* topic of interest, discussion and academic freedom. Or it would be debunked. That’s it. There are no other options. Just those two.
In a functional world where scientists are not '''precarious''', it would be a *huge* topic of interest, discussion and [[Academic Freedom]]. Or it would be debunked. That’s it. There are no other options. Just those two.


Please leave your list below with links! 🙏
Please leave your list below with links! 🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1922242777422954949
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A very interesting question is why academics almost uniformly make fun of conspiracy theories
when presented by colleagues at least.
Los Alamos, Tuskegee, Human Terrain Systems, etc. all involved conspiracy BY ACADEMICS. Some were good. Some bad. Some ambiguous.
But isn’t it odd that conspiracies are a permanent part of human existence, yet trying to study them or theorize about them results in crippling professional penalties?
I am astonished that I have not heard one single physicist call @pmarca a liar for claiming the Biden Whitehouse revealed that entire public subfields of theoretical physics were taken off-line by the government for security reasons, and disappeared or went dark.
Nor have I heard “We have to look into this!”.</br>
Nor have I heard “Wow! That is super interesting.” Just silence.
But what I have heard is academics finding it laughable that others find this is interesting.
The @pmarca claim about physics is thus one of the most anti-interesting claims I have ever heard. Everyone in physics just seems to intuitively know not to ask about it.
Has anyone seen @michiokaku, @neiltyson, @bgreene etc. commenting on this claim? I haven’t.
They all just know: Don’t go there girlfriend.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=tsarnick-profile-PRpYEDXP.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/tsarnick/status/1813393267679240647
|name=Tsarathustra
|usernameurl=https://x.com/tsarnick
|username=tsarnick
|content=Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz say that when they met White House officials to discuss AI, the officials said they could classify any area of math they think is leading in a bad direction to make it a state secret and "it will end"
|media1=tsarnick-X-post-1813393267679240647.jpg
|timestamp=2:00 AM · Jul 16, 2024
}}
|timestamp=10:49 AM · May 13, 2025
}}
|timestamp=11:09 AM · May 13, 2025
|timestamp=11:09 AM · May 13, 2025
}}
}}
Line 581: Line 688:
* [[Science, The Endless Frontier (1945)]]
* [[Science, The Endless Frontier (1945)]]
* [[True Elite]]
* [[True Elite]]
* [[Welfare Queens in White Lab Coats]]




[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/23067...24382"