Anti-Interesting: Difference between revisions

|content=Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news & professors. They are not disinterested, but '''anti-interested'''. Except for Greg.

|content=What is '''anti-interesting'''? Well Jeffery Epstein’s wealth source is '''anti-interesting''' to media. Bernie in 2016 was '''anti-interesting''' to @nytimes. Income inequality was '''anti-interesting''' to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was '''anti-interesting'''. Building Seven too.

|content=To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically '''anti-interesting'''. Flight 800 is pretty '''anti-interesting''' as was the [[Boskin Commission|Boskin Commission’s]] attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the [[CPI]]. The [[H-1B Visa|H1-B visa]] history is '''anti-interesting'''. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.

|content='''Anti-interesting''', adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).

|content=Q: Are Enormous Canadian Trucker Protests '''Anti-Interesting'''? If so, why?

|content='''“Anti-Interesting”''' is an important concept: not everyone has experienced it, but once you see it even a single time, you will see it repeatedly thereafter.

|content=This story is '''anti-interesting''' in the way that Jeffrey Epstein is '''anti-interesting'''.

Follow the pathological disinterest. Follow silence. Follow what is '''anti-interesting'''. Let the “[[Nothing Burger]]” guide you.