Jump to content

The Golden Age of General Relativity: Difference between revisions

Line 269: Line 269:
}}
}}
|timestamp=3:40 PM · Jun 9, 2023
|timestamp=3:40 PM · Jun 9, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1667206958250876933
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But how much really weird stuff is there after you get rid of the first four which are definitely all real? I can’t tell you. Too much BS around the first 4. Just push for disclosure. Stop asking everyone what they think is true about every last development.
*Something* is up.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1667206953033154561
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why are we always guessing? I don’t get this. As I’ve been saying, there are some crazy stories here and no one has the overarching history.
Know when you don’t know, and don’t have a good guess. That is what we do in science. We say “I don’t even have a guess at this point.”
|timestamp=4:28 PM · Jun 9, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1667206956145340416
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I still don’t have a good guess. It feels like at least five things stuck together:
A proto-religion forming.
A USG aerospace disinformation  narrative.
A story about foreign spying on US installations.
A physics narrative from the 1950s & [[The Golden Age of General Relativity|Golden Age of GR]].
Actual wildness.
|timestamp=4:28 PM · Jun 9, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:28 PM · Jun 9, 2023
}}
=== 2024 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1766244211987476587
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Many of you are asking for my reaction regarding the just released @DoD_AARO report. There is much to say. I want to think carefully before saying more. I am not unsympathetic to US National Security needs in this.
In February of 2023, @joerogan invited me for four hours onto the world's largest English Language program (episode #1945) to describe in detail the mystery of potential US Government involvement in UFOs and Post-Einsteinian physics during the mysterious [[The Golden Age of General Relativity|"Golden Age of General Relativity"]]. It has been seen and discussed by millions as expected. I was thus eager to see how thorough this report would be by combing it for  search strings raised in my research.
REFERENCES:
"Glenn L Martin Company": 0</br>
Bryce Cecile DeWitt: 0</br>
Institute for Field Physics: 0</br>
Research Institute for Advanced Study: 0</br>
Louis Witten:  0</br>
Roger Babson: 0</br>
Agnew Bahson: 0</br>
Gravity Research Foundation: 0</br>
Gravity: 1 (pg. 32)</br>
Rennaisance Technologies: 0</br>
UNC Chapel Hill: 0</br>
Solomon Lefschetz: 0</br>
Freeman Dyson: 0</br>
Herman Bondi: 0</br>
Negative Mass: 0</br>
"Scientific and Intelligence Aspects of the UFO Problem"</br>
Australian Intelligence 1971 Report: 0</br>
Australia: 0</br>
George Rideout: 0</br>
Edward Teller: 0</br>
Robert Oppenheimer: 0</br>
David Kaiser: 0</br>
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base: 1 (pg. 18)</br>
Curtis Wright Aerospace Buffalo: 0</br>
Pascal Jordan: 0</br>
[[Mansfield Amendment (1969)|Mansfield Ammendment]]: 0</br>
Joshua Goldberg: 0</br>
Office of Global Access: 0</br>
University of Texas, Austin: 0</br>
Center for Dynamical Systems: 0</br>
Physics: 5 (pgs. 16-17, 53)</br>
Relativity: 0</br>
Albert Einstein: 0</br>
George Bunker: 0</br>
Welcome Bender: 0</br>
George Trimble: 0
CONCLUSION: This report purports to have studied the questions raised surrounding UFO/UAP related research of the US federal Government. It, in fact, appears to have studied a carefully chosen  SUBSET of the claims selected from among those which appear to have mass appeal to the so-called "UFO Community." It completely, or nearly completely, avoided reporting on all questions surrounding issues which have been raised in serious research and by PhD level researchers who have raised scientific questions in this area. This continues the pattern of using PhD level government scientists who appear to avoid the actual research questions most likely to involve sensitve Special Access Programs and Stovepiped Research which are compartmentalized by design. Whether the omissions are due to issues of avoidance, misdirection (e.g. so-called Limited Hangout strategy), ignorance or incompetance cannot be discerned from the information given.
RECOMMENDATION: It is simply not possible to treat the current AARO report as historically complete or comprehensive. To gain the public trust, the successor to AARO would have to expand and redo this analysis with input from domain professionals who are trusted by the public not to have an apparent agenda or government background (e.g. Prof. David Kaiser of MIT or Dr. Nima Arkani Hamed of IAS, Prof. Brian Keating of UCSD, Avi Loeb of Harvard) Otherwise, it is relatively easy for scientists to [[Follow the Silence|"Follow the Silence"]] in government reports to see what is *not* being addressed or discussed.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1766244211987476587-GIL1a0fa8AA-5bB.jpg
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=DoD_AARO-profile-t6qtatM.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/DoD_AARO/status/1766145163636740162
|name=All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
|usernameurl=https://x.com/DoD_AARO
|username=DoD_AARO
|content=Today the DoD released our Historical Record Report Volume 1.
AARO’s report covers more than 70 years of the U.S. record relating to UAP, draws from interviews, archival research, and partnerships across government and industry.
Read it here: https://statics.dod.teams.microsoft.us/evergreen-assets/safelinks/1/atp-safelinks.html
|timestamp=3:53 PM · Mar 8, 2024
}}
|timestamp=11:26 PM · Mar 8, 2024
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1856826246765883730
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The denied programs are real.
Shellenberger is proving that.
I went as far as I could, but hit an absolute wall and couldn’t get names like “immaculate constellation” to search on. Congratulations to my buddy Michael @shellenberger for breaking through.
It will be great if he can finally connect the mysterious so-called [[The Golden Age of General Relativity|“Golden Age of General Relativity”]] of physics in the ‘50s-‘60s to these programs. Or if he can put that to rest. Either way we need to know.
There may be no aliens or craft. I have seen no high quality evidence yet myself.
But then we will have an enormous question as to what these denied programs really were doing in the first place. Either way, it’s going to be incredibly interesting. 🙏
|timestamp=10:27 PM · Nov 13, 2024
}}
}}