Jump to content

Paul Samuelson: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=6649381477}}
=== 2009 ===
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6650075823}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6650139847}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6650182763}}
{{Tweet
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6650343788}}
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6710223799}}
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6650343788
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6710331511}}
|name=Eric Weinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=6933565112}}
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=8630284320}}
|username=EricRWeinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=20272625428}}
|content=I think many scientists would have found '''Paul Samuelson''' a formidable fellow scientist, technically knowledgable far beyond economics. I did.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6649381477
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I should say that the idea that Gauge Theory would bring field theory to economics was any easy sell to '''Samuelson'''. The details never took.
|timestamp=2:59 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6650075823
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content="One must not expect to be able to make the naive measurements that untutored common sense always longs for." -'''P. Samuelson''' (w/ Swamy) 1974
|timestamp=3:23 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6650139847
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content="[W]e must not be bemused by the undoubted elegances...of the
homothetic theory. Nor should we shoot the honest theorist." -'''Samuelson'''&Swamy
|timestamp=3:25 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6650182763
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content='''Paul Samuelson''' told me these lines of his would ward off any detractors who did not understand what Lie groups and gauge theory could solve.
|timestamp=3:27 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
|timestamp=3:32 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6710331511
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content="Some day when I pass through St Peter’s Gates I do think I have 1/2 a cigar still coming to me" -'''P Samuelson''' now looking for J von Neumann
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6710223799
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=“Would you bet a cigar on that?” -John Von Neumann cowing '''Paul Samuelson'''
|timestamp=10:38 PM · Dec 15, 2009
}}
|timestamp=10:42 PM · Dec 15, 2009
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6933565112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=.@riemannzeta: '''Samuelson's''' economics is to Newtonian physics what gauge theoretic economics is to Einstein/Yang-Mills http://bit.ly/PSINAE
|timestamp=4:27 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
 
=== 2010 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/8630284320
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In '''Samuelson's''' Nobel lecture, he struggles with integrability. I wish there was more there as curvature tensors measure it's failure.
|timestamp=12:37 PM · Feb 4, 2010
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/20272625428
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=How crazy is [[Gauge Theory|economic gauge theory]]? '''Paul Samuelson''' liked it because he was looking for it in 1950(!): http://bit.ly/c6vILI (e.g. see fig 4).
|timestamp=2:58 AM · Aug 4, 2010
}}
 
=== 2021 ===
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1456733111954272257}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1456733111954272257}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1457611789114527744}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1457611789114527744}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1524175742715633664}}
 
=== 2022 ===
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1524178048840454146
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In short, there are economists who believe in measuring inflation, who struggle to understand the issues…and there are economists who work backwards from the political masters they serve. This is a rough guide to both camps.
 
The researchers tend to lose to the political types.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1524175742715633664
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Well let us give economists their due.
 
The most cogent economists on the subject of price indices include:
 
Bert M Balk (Statistics Netherlands)</br>
Carl Christian von Weizsäcker</br>
'''Paul Samuelson''' and S Swamy</br>
Amartya Sen</br>
Franklin Fisher and Karl Shell</br>
and Erwin Diewert (very uneven).
|timestamp=11:53 PM · May 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1524177299385462784
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I cannot be objective about my collaborator @PiaMalaney, but I can say that it would be a good idea to review her critique by the [[Boskin Commission|Boskin commissioners]], who I found to represent the “Psst. Just tell us what you need the number to be and we can help you out.” school of economics.
|timestamp=11:59 PM · May 10, 2022
}}
|timestamp=12:02 AM · May 11, 2022
}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1553909631805599745}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1553909631805599745}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1589296342685601792}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1589296342685601792}}
=== 2023 ===
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1620286139742683137}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1620286139742683137}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1620608908153987072}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1620608908153987072}}