Anti-Expert: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/831025834215354368 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content='''Anti-Expert''', n: 1. A person with expert training & credentials, yet who rejects consensus/institutional positions that cannot bear scrutiny. | |||
|timestamp=6:22 AM · Feb 13, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
{{ | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/942508569022283776 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Will read. Thanks! | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/941847029659009029 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Just listened to my friend @SamHarrisOrg w/ @RadioFreeTom. | |||
== | I was unexpectedly bewildered. Given the right forum, it would be an honor & privilege to '''steelman the substantive case against experts & their institutions''' into coastal-friendly PhD-style expert terminology & language. | ||
https://x.com/samharrisorg/status/941120953139978242 | |||
|timestamp=1:46 AM · Dec 16, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/942138500039634944 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Also, the public that is HIGH agency is looking for alternate non-institutional experts: @nntaleb @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @SamHarrisOrg @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker etc.... | |||
|timestamp=9:04 PM · Dec 16, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=nntaleb-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/nntaleb/status/942500079692337153 | |||
|name=Nassim Nicholas Taleb | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/nntaleb | |||
|username=nntaleb | |||
|content=Eric, given that you know how much I scorn @SamHarrisOrg, why are you putting my handle? | |||
|timestamp=9:01 PM · Dec 16, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/942507916824788992 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Hi Nassim, With 66 dyadic relationships between 12 individuals there was zero implied pairwise mutual endorsement or respect implied. I’m certainly happy to make that explicit here for the record if that wasn’t clear. | |||
|timestamp=9:32 PM · Dec 17, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=nntaleb-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/nntaleb/status/942508352906649601 | |||
|name=Nassim Nicholas Taleb | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/nntaleb | |||
|username=nntaleb | |||
|content=The reason is (partly here) | |||
https://medium.com/incerto/the-facts-are-true-the-news-is-fake-5bf98104cea2 | |||
|timestamp=9:34 PM · Dec 16, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=9:35 PM · Dec 17, 2017 | |||
}} | |||
== Related Pages == | |||
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | * [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:07, 24 October 2025
Anti-Expert, n: 1. A person with expert training & credentials, yet who rejects consensus/institutional positions that cannot bear scrutiny.
Just listened to my friend @SamHarrisOrg w/ @RadioFreeTom.
I was unexpectedly bewildered. Given the right forum, it would be an honor & privilege to steelman the substantive case against experts & their institutions into coastal-friendly PhD-style expert terminology & language.
@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Also, the public that is HIGH agency is looking for alternate non-institutional experts: @nntaleb @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @SamHarrisOrg @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker etc....
Eric, given that you know how much I scorn @SamHarrisOrg, why are you putting my handle?
Hi Nassim, With 66 dyadic relationships between 12 individuals there was zero implied pairwise mutual endorsement or respect implied. I’m certainly happy to make that explicit here for the record if that wasn’t clear.
The reason is (partly here) https://medium.com/incerto/the-facts-are-true-the-news-is-fake-5bf98104cea2
Will read. Thanks!