1,568
edits
The Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [https://thebasics.guide/gell-mann-amnesia-effect/ Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect] is a psychological phenomenon that highlights people's tendency to recognize the unreliability of media when it comes to topics they're familiar with, while still trusting the media for information on other topics. | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. I'd point out it does not operate in other arenas of life. In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say. In court, there is the legal doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means untruthful in one part, untruthful in all. But when it comes to the media, we believe against evidence that it is probably worth our time to read other parts of the paper. When, in fact, it almost certainly isn't. The only possible explanation for our behavior is amnesia. | That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. I'd point out it does not operate in other arenas of life. In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say. In court, there is the legal doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means untruthful in one part, untruthful in all. But when it comes to the media, we believe against evidence that it is probably worth our time to read other parts of the paper. When, in fact, it almost certainly isn't. The only possible explanation for our behavior is amnesia. | ||
— [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton#GellMannAmnesiaEffect Michael Crichton] | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||