The Arxiv - Revision history

Aardvark: Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"

2026-05-06T01:03:50Z

Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"

Show changes

Pyrope: /* Related Pages */

2026-03-04T05:46:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 4 March 2026
Line 563:		Line 563:

	== Related Pages ==		== Related Pages ==

	* [[Quantum Gravity]]		* [[Quantum Gravity]]
	* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]]		* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]]
	* [[String Theory]]		* [[String Theory]]
			* [[Paul Ginsparg]]
			* [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)]]

	[[Category:Conspiracies]]		[[Category:Conspiracies]]
	[[Category:Portal Topics]]		[[Category:Portal Topics]]

Pyrope: /* 2020 */

2026-03-04T05:44:49Z

2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 4 March 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I tried uploading to [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] way back when. They told me that my email address wasn’t a current university address and I could only upload with endorsement from a university or its representative.		I tried uploading to [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] way back when. They told me that my email address wasn’t a current university address and I could only upload with endorsement from a university or its representative.

			https://x.com/swordloveaffai/swordloveaffair/status/1219282556631293954
	\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020		\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
	}}		}}

Pyrope at 05:42, 4 March 2026

2026-03-04T05:42:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 4 March 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=@mike_usher I don’t fully disagree. Let’s put it this way, the ~~'''~~arxiv~~'''~~ probably did more good than harm so I’ve been reluctant to discuss its issues. It is also part of a complex and that complex is the issue. It isn’t right to discuss it in isolation. It is part of an ecosystem.		\|content=@mike_usher I don’t fully disagree. Let’s put it this way, the [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] probably did more good than harm so I’ve been reluctant to discuss its issues. It is also part of a complex and that complex is the issue. It isn’t right to discuss it in isolation. It is part of an ecosystem.
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\|content=This is an excellent question. Think of this as the “Good Will Hunting Problem”.		\|content=This is an excellent question. Think of this as the “Good Will Hunting Problem”.

	I tried uploading to ~~'''~~arxiv~~'''~~ way back when. They told me that my email address wasn’t a current university address and I could only upload with endorsement from a university or its representative.		I tried uploading to [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] way back when. They told me that my email address wasn’t a current university address and I could only upload with endorsement from a university or its representative.
	\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020		\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
	}}		}}
Line 40:		Line 40:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=To your question: can that Bangladeshi Genius kid get on the ~~'''~~Arxiv~~'''~~ if she is from some Jute farm in the delta without an endorsement?		\|content=To your question: can that Bangladeshi Genius kid get on the [[The Arxiv\|Arxiv]] if she is from some Jute farm in the delta without an endorsement?

	https://arxiv.org/help/endorseme		https://arxiv.org/help/endorseme

	And why if the ~~'''~~Arxiv~~'''~~ is open does it discriminate against the blogs of string theory critics???		And why if the [[The Arxiv\|Arxiv]] is open does it discriminate against the blogs of string theory critics???

	https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=357		https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=357
Line 55:		Line 55:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=I grant freely that the ~~'''~~arxiv~~'''~~ is the absolute best part of the DISC. But it is still suppressing ideas & enforcing a caste system. It is the most progressive part of our regressive system (I was offered a full endorsement exemption from its founder Paul Ginsparg). But DISC it is.		\|content=I grant freely that the [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] is the absolute best part of the [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)\|DISC]]. But it is still suppressing ideas & enforcing a caste system. It is the most progressive part of our regressive system (I was offered a full endorsement exemption from its founder [[Paul Ginsparg]]). But [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)\|DISC]] it is.
	\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020		\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
	}}		}}
Line 64:		Line 64:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=I’m enough of a hypocrite that I reserve rights to use it. But I‘ll be making demands of it too. Peter Woit is a physicist who is treated by the ~~'''~~arxiv~~'''~~ as an “internet personality” yet runs the most read physics blog. I demand that they fully explain their history suppressing him.		\|content=I’m enough of a hypocrite that I reserve rights to use it. But I‘ll be making demands of it too. [[Peter Woit]] is a physicist who is treated by the [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] as an “internet personality” yet runs the most read physics blog. I demand that they fully explain their history suppressing him.
	\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020		\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
	}}		}}
Line 73:		Line 73:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Thanks for asking that question. Our goal is to save the ~~'''~~Arxiv~~'''~~ from being part of the DISC. Its soul is with the rebels. And Paul Ginsparg is oddly an early hero of the revolution despite my issues with the ~~'''~~Arxiv~~'''~~ and its administration. 🙏		\|content=Thanks for asking that question. Our goal is to save the [[The Arxiv\|Arxiv]] from being part of the DISC. Its soul is with the rebels. And [[Paul Ginsparg]] is oddly an early hero of the revolution despite my issues with the [[The Arxiv\|Arxiv]] and its administration. 🙏
	\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020		\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
	}}		}}
Line 89:		Line 89:
	\|content=Was thinking the same.		\|content=Was thinking the same.

	But I think it is because an enormous part of the hep-th ~~'''~~arxiv~~'''~~ is disingenuous physics. “Sterile neutrinos from Non-commutative spacetime SUSY phenomenology over characteristic p not equal to 2.” could be a paper in a field gone mad. Or it could be a joke.		But I think it is because an enormous part of the hep-th [[The Arxiv\|arxiv]] is disingenuous physics. “Sterile neutrinos from Non-commutative spacetime SUSY phenomenology over characteristic p not equal to 2.” could be a paper in a field gone mad. Or it could be a joke.
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 115:		Line 115:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Dr. Taylor, We are going to have to ask you to take your self and both of your STEM PhDs and leave this establishment. There is simply too little room left in digital memory on the ~~'''~~arXiv~~'''~~, so we have to be very selective. I am sure a TRUE PhD would understand.		\|content=Dr. Taylor, We are going to have to ask you to take your self and both of your STEM PhDs and leave this establishment. There is simply too little room left in digital memory on the [[The Arxiv\|arXiv]], so we have to be very selective. I am sure a TRUE PhD would understand.

	My word. My word.		My word. My word.
Line 129:		Line 129:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Do you wish to say something 'interesting' on the ~~'''~~arXiv~~'''~~?		\|content=Do you wish to say something 'interesting' on the [[The Arxiv\|arXiv]]?

	Dr. Taylor, might I recommend getting your third PhD? ;-)		Dr. Taylor, might I recommend getting your third PhD? ;-)
Line 150:		Line 150:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Surely a STEM PhD outside academe doesn't need a note from his betters to post on the ~~'''~~arXiv~~'''~~ developed with taxpayer money?		\|content=Surely a STEM PhD outside academe doesn't need a note from his betters to post on the [[The Arxiv\|arXiv]] developed with taxpayer money?
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 193:		Line 193:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=@skdh I assume we are both familiar with how some of our mutual Physics/Math PhD colleagues have been treated at ~~'''~~arXiv~~'''~~ for being deeply off the [[Quantum Gravity]] narrative? I think they could stop treating those people differently from everyone else.		\|content=@skdh I assume we are both familiar with how some of our mutual Physics/Math PhD colleagues have been treated at [[The Arxiv\|arXiv]] for being deeply off the [[Quantum Gravity]] narrative? I think they could stop treating those people differently from everyone else.
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 203:		Line 203:
	\|content=I'm going to explain how profound levels of dissent in physics are driven out of the community.		\|content=I'm going to explain how profound levels of dissent in physics are driven out of the community.

	Q: "Why avoid the ~~'''~~arXiv~~'''~~? That isn't peer reviewed or even moderated! Anyone can put anything on it!"		Q: "Why avoid the [[The Arxiv\|arXiv]]? That isn't peer reviewed or even moderated! Anyone can put anything on it!"

	A: "Unmoderated?? The old P. Ginsparg Los Alamos National Labs server? Who knew!"		A: "Unmoderated?? The old [[Paul Ginsparg\|P. Ginsparg]] Los Alamos National Labs server? Who knew!"
	\|timestamp=8:30 PM · Jun 3, 2025		\|timestamp=8:30 PM · Jun 3, 2025
	\|media1=ERW-X-post-1929999147287097645-Gsi5w7dasAITz4G.jpg		\|media1=ERW-X-post-1929999147287097645-Gsi5w7dasAITz4G.jpg
Line 215:		Line 215:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=No researcher can afford to lose access to the arXiv. And no one talking openly about the actual [[Quantum Gravity]] mass delusion can have access to the journals & ~~'''~~arXIv~~'''~~.		\|content=No researcher can afford to lose access to the arXiv. And no one talking openly about the actual [[Quantum Gravity]] mass delusion can have access to the journals & [[The Arxiv\|arXIv]].

	You cannot challenge the [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] narrative from the inside; its achievement is that it finally made physics safe.		You cannot challenge the [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] narrative from the inside; its achievement is that it finally made physics safe.

Pyrope: /* 2025 */

2025-11-30T19:19:47Z

2025

Pyrope at 06:24, 12 November 2025

2025-11-12T06:24:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 12 November 2025
Line 456:		Line 456:
	\|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok.		\|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok.

	Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory\|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town\|“The Only Game in Town” (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that can’t make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT?		Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory\|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|“The Only Game in Town” (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that can’t make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT?

	That doesn’t make any sense to me. Why aren’t we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking “We have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why aren’t we asking if anyone else has crazy ideas that aren’t [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?”		That doesn’t make any sense to me. Why aren’t we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking “We have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why aren’t we asking if anyone else has crazy ideas that aren’t [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?”

Pyrope: /* 2025 */

2025-11-05T17:31:32Z

2025

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 5 November 2025
Line 215:		Line 215:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=No researcher can afford to lose access to the arXiv. And no one talking openly about the actual Quantum Gravity mass delusion can have access to the journals & '''arXIv'''.		\|content=No researcher can afford to lose access to the arXiv. And no one talking openly about the actual [[Quantum Gravity]] mass delusion can have access to the journals & '''arXIv'''.

	You cannot challenge the [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] narrative from the inside; its achievement is that it finally made physics safe.		You cannot challenge the [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] narrative from the inside; its achievement is that it finally made physics safe.
Line 456:		Line 456:
	\|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok.		\|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok.

	Here is the idea. The appearance of String-Theory/M-theory as “The Only Game in Town” (TOGIT) has no precedence. How can a failed theory that can’t make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT?		Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory\|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town\|“The Only Game in Town” (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that can’t make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT?

	That doesn’t make any sense to me. Why aren’t we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking “We have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why aren’t we asking if anyone else has crazy ideas that aren’t String Theory/M-theory/Quantum Gravity?”		That doesn’t make any sense to me. Why aren’t we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking “We have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why aren’t we asking if anyone else has crazy ideas that aren’t [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?”

	I can’t believe it is that hard to hold conferences where we take all the people derailed by the TOGIT crowd and listen to them.		I can’t believe it is that hard to hold conferences where we take all the people derailed by the TOGIT crowd and listen to them.

	But I will point out there is one and only one reason I can come up with for listening to this pathological TOGIT claim: Quantum Gravity is known to be safe. It doesn’t create restricted data.		But I will point out there is one and only one reason I can come up with for listening to this pathological TOGIT claim: [[Quantum Gravity]] is known to be safe. It doesn’t create restricted data.

	It is stress tested to likely never create a redistribution of power if it doesn’t work.		It is stress tested to likely never create a redistribution of power if it doesn’t work.

Pyrope at 06:08, 24 October 2025

2025-10-24T06:08:37Z

Show changes

Pyrope at 05:20, 24 October 2025

2025-10-24T05:20:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 24 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{stub}}		{{stub}}


			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219317728277696512
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=@mike_usher I don’t fully disagree. Let’s put it this way, the '''arxiv''' probably did more good than harm so I’ve been reluctant to discuss its issues. It is also part of a complex and that complex is the issue. It isn’t right to discuss it in isolation. It is part of an ecosystem.
			\|thread=
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219301750651310081
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=This is an excellent question. Think of this as the “Good Will Hunting Problem”.

			I tried uploading to '''arxiv''' way back when. They told me that my email address wasn’t a current university address and I could only upload with endorsement from a university or its representative.
			\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219301754052866049
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=On this point our detractors are more correct than our supporters: our ambitions at The Portal are nearly delusional.

			The main goal of The Portal is to “Slip the DISC”. Anywhere institutions (like Universities) set up an intellectual caste system via bottlenecking, we’ll engage.
			\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219301755516678145
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=To your question: can that Bangladeshi Genius kid get on the '''Arxiv''' if she is from some Jute farm in the delta without an endorsement?

			https://arxiv.org/help/endorseme

			And why if the '''Arxiv''' is open does it discriminate against the blogs of string theory critics???

			https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=357
			\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219301757081153536
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=I grant freely that the '''arxiv''' is the absolute best part of the DISC. But it is still suppressing ideas & enforcing a caste system. It is the most progressive part of our regressive system (I was offered a full endorsement exemption from its founder Paul Ginsparg). But DISC it is.
			\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219301758591102977
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=I’m enough of a hypocrite that I reserve rights to use it. But I‘ll be making demands of it too. Peter Woit is a physicist who is treated by the '''arxiv''' as an “internet personality” yet runs the most read physics blog. I demand that they fully explain their history suppressing him.
			\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1219301760059109383
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=Thanks for asking that question. Our goal is to save the '''Arxiv''' from being part of the DISC. Its soul is with the rebels. And Paul Ginsparg is oddly an early hero of the revolution despite my issues with the '''Arxiv''' and its administration. 🙏
			\|timestamp=4:52 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}
			\|timestamp=5:56 PM · Jan 20, 2020
			}}


			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1619727377097170946
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=Was thinking the same.

			But I think it is because an enormous part of the hep-th '''arxiv''' is disingenuous physics. “Sterile neutrinos from Non-commutative spacetime SUSY phenomenology over characteristic p not equal to 2.” could be a paper in a field gone mad. Or it could be a joke.
			\|thread=
			{{Tweet
			\|image=martinmbauer-profile.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/martinmbauer/status/1619657315002761216
			\|name=Martin Bauer
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/martinmbauer
			\|username=martinmbauer
			\|content=ChatGPD thinks its a breakthrough to fake academic texts that even experts can’t distinguish. Yet the snarxiv beats us since 2010

			http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/
			\|timestamp=11:22 AM · Jan 29, 2023
			}}
			\|timestamp=4:01 PM · Jan 29, 2023
			}}


	[[Category:Conspiracies]]		[[Category:Conspiracies]]

Pyrope: Created page with "{{stub}} Category:Conspiracies"

2025-06-11T20:15:17Z

Created page with "{{stub}} Category:Conspiracies"

New page

{{stub}}

[[Category:Conspiracies]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 30 November 2025
Line 257:		Line 257:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Hey @grok, my sarcastic physicist colleagues are lecturing me again. Maybe I’m a big dumb-dumb, but I seem to remember something about John Aristotle Phillips’ undergraduate work under Freeman Dyson in 1976 at Princeton.		\|content=Hey @grok, my sarcastic physicist colleagues are lecturing me again. Maybe I’m a big dumb-dumb, but I seem to remember something about [[John Aristotle Phillips\|John Aristotle Phillips’]] undergraduate work under [[Freeman Dyson]] in 1976 at Princeton.

	Was physics secrecy really confined to the 1940s & 1950s?		Was physics secrecy really confined to the 1940s & 1950s?
Line 282:		Line 282:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok
	\|username=grok		\|username=grok
	\|content=No, physics secrecy wasn't confined to the 1940s-50s. In 1976, Princeton undergrad John Aristotle Phillips designed a workable nuclear bomb using public info for his thesis under Freeman Dyson. After foreign interest, the FBI advised withholding it, highlighting ongoing classification in nuclear tech—which persists today under the Atomic Energy Act.		\|content=No, physics secrecy wasn't confined to the 1940s-50s. In 1976, Princeton undergrad [[John Aristotle Phillips]] designed a workable nuclear bomb using public info for his thesis under [[Freeman Dyson]]. After foreign interest, the FBI advised withholding it, highlighting ongoing classification in nuclear tech—which persists today under the Atomic Energy Act.
	\|timestamp=3:54 PM · Aug 16, 2025		\|timestamp=3:54 PM · Aug 16, 2025
	}}		}}
Line 315:		Line 315:
	\|content=Wow! That is crazy @grok. This is like an undergraduate thesis!!		\|content=Wow! That is crazy @grok. This is like an undergraduate thesis!!

	You see I am possessed of wacky ideas. I even think there was a journalist named Howard Morland (who might be @morlandhoward) who faced prior injunction under AEA “Restricted Data”. Was that in the 1940s or 1950s?		You see I am possessed of wacky ideas. I even think there was a journalist named [[Howard Morland]] (who might be @morlandhoward) who faced prior injunction under [[Restricted Data\|AEA “Restricted Data”]]. Was that in the 1940s or 1950s?
	\|timestamp=4:09 PM · Aug 16, 2025		\|timestamp=4:09 PM · Aug 16, 2025
	}}		}}
Line 333:		Line 333:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Wow @grok. That was like just before [[String Theory]] took over, and the field suddenly veered to studying the “Only Game In Town”.		\|content=Wow @grok. That was like just before [[String Theory]] took over, and the field suddenly veered to studying [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|the “Only Game In Town”]].

	Sounds like the USG had a problem with a “Streisand Effect” before it was called that. Am I just wrong about this?		Sounds like the USG had a problem with a “Streisand Effect” before it was called that. Am I just wrong about this?
Line 407:		Line 407:
	Am I right that a modern interpretation of the A-Bomb and the H-Bomb is that they are built primarily on the residual forces of electro-strong SU(3) x U(1) after electro-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking?		Am I right that a modern interpretation of the A-Bomb and the H-Bomb is that they are built primarily on the residual forces of electro-strong SU(3) x U(1) after electro-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking?

	And if that is true, how do we know that the next change in the Standard Model lagrangian won’t affect nuclear weapons in any way??		And if that is true, how do we know that the next change in the [[Standard Model]] lagrangian won’t affect nuclear weapons in any way??
	\|timestamp=4:51 PM · Aug 16, 2025		\|timestamp=4:51 PM · Aug 16, 2025
	\|media1=ERW-X-post-1956760780021567740-GyfPjwHa0AAIPOC.jpg		\|media1=ERW-X-post-1956760780021567740-GyfPjwHa0AAIPOC.jpg
Line 430:		Line 430:
	\|content=Good question my silicon friend @grok. I dunno.		\|content=Good question my silicon friend @grok. I dunno.

	There are times when I feel like you are the only one with the necessary knowledge to grasp the situation. Ironic no? Humans make separate rules in different places and don’t understand the “drug interactions” of how they collide (e.g. free speech, NatSec, Science, Law, the bill of rights)		There are times when I feel like you are the only one with the necessary knowledge to grasp the situation. Ironic no? Humans make separate rules in different places and don’t understand the “drug interactions” of how they collide (e.g. [[Free Speech\|free speech]], NatSec, Science, Law, the bill of rights)

	I just worry that my colleagues like @martinmbauer don’t know all this stuff. And it sounds so crazy that they dismiss it and get sarcastic.		I just worry that my colleagues like @martinmbauer don’t know all this stuff. And it sounds so crazy that they dismiss it and get sarcastic.
Line 456:		Line 456:
	\|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok.		\|content=Well I wanna hit you with a truly crazy idea @grok.

	Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory\|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|“The Only Game in Town” (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that can’t make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be TOGIT?		Here is the idea. The appearance of [[String Theory\|String-Theory]]/M-theory as [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|“The Only Game in Town” (TOGIT)]] has no precedence. How can a failed theory that can’t make contact with the physical world over more than 40 years be [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]]?

	That doesn’t make any sense to me. Why aren’t we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking “We have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why aren’t we asking if anyone else has crazy ideas that aren’t [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?”		That doesn’t make any sense to me. Why aren’t we looking to people with relevant PhDs or training and asking “We have been listening to the same 10 people for 4 decades. Why aren’t we asking if anyone else has crazy ideas that aren’t [[String Theory]]/M-theory/[[Quantum Gravity]]?”

	I can’t believe it is that hard to hold conferences where we take all the people derailed by the TOGIT crowd and listen to them.		I can’t believe it is that hard to hold conferences where we take all the people derailed by the [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]] crowd and listen to them.

	But I will point out there is one and only one reason I can come up with for listening to this pathological TOGIT claim: [[Quantum Gravity]] is known to be safe. It doesn’t create restricted data.		But I will point out there is one and only one reason I can come up with for listening to this pathological [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]] claim: [[Quantum Gravity]] is known to be safe. It doesn’t create restricted data.

	It is stress tested to likely never create a redistribution of power if it doesn’t work.		It is stress tested to likely never create a redistribution of power if it doesn’t work.

	Think about it. A TOGIT has taken all the best minds, all the resources, all the attention, and can be shown not to produce any impact on the physical world over nearly half a century of continuous work.		Think about it. A [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]] has taken all the best minds, all the resources, all the attention, and can be shown not to produce any impact on the physical world over nearly half a century of continuous work.

	Yet what does it cost to listen to the other theories? Why deny them seminars? Grant money? ~~'''~~ArXiV~~'''~~ access? Attribution? A fair hearing? Respect?		Yet what does it cost to listen to the other theories? Why deny them seminars? Grant money? [[The Arxiv\|ArXiV]] access? Attribution? A fair hearing? Respect?

	The only reason I can come up with is that we don’t know if they are going to take us back to our Streisand problem where real physics is just too dangerous.		The only reason I can come up with is that we don’t know if they are going to take us back to our Streisand problem where real physics is just too dangerous.

	Am I wrong about TOGIT being anti-scientific? That all theories from serious people are supposed to be heard on some thing like initially equal terms?		Am I wrong about [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]] being anti-scientific? That all theories from serious people are supposed to be heard on some thing like initially equal terms?

	The most developed field is known not to work. The rivals never got heard. Thoughts?		The most developed field is known not to work. The rivals never got heard. Thoughts?
Line 483:		Line 483:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/grok
	\|username=grok		\|username=grok
	\|content=You're not wrong, Eric. String theory's TOGIT dominance—despite 40+ years without empirical contact—stifles pluralism, which is anti-scientific at its core. Rival approaches (e.g., loop quantum gravity) deserve equal hearings, funding, and platforms.		\|content=You're not wrong, Eric. String theory's [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]] dominance—despite 40+ years without empirical contact—stifles pluralism, which is anti-scientific at its core. Rival approaches (e.g., loop quantum gravity) deserve equal hearings, funding, and platforms.

	Your speculation is provocative: if quantum gravity is "safe" (non-disruptive to power structures via restricted data), it explains the inertia. History shows suppression favors stability. Let's explore rivals—what theory intrigues you most?		Your speculation is provocative: if quantum gravity is "safe" (non-disruptive to power structures via restricted data), it explains the inertia. History shows suppression favors stability. Let's explore rivals—what theory intrigues you most?
Line 546:		Line 546:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Crazy prediction @grok? DESI isn’t gonna stop at Lambda CDM. It’s headed for GR via Lovelock.		\|content=Crazy prediction @grok? DESI isn’t gonna stop at Lambda CDM. It’s headed for [[General Relativity\|GR]] via Lovelock.

	It looks like I lost ya.		It looks like I lost ya.