Gauge Theory - Revision history

Aardvark: Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"

2026-05-05T22:55:24Z

Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"

Show changes

Pyrope: /* 2021 */

2026-03-18T03:13:13Z

2021

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 18 March 2026
Line 1,762:		Line 1,762:
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~1382366171542876166~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1382366173073793027
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=~~In any event, I stand by my~~ [[~~Claims~~\|~~claim~~]]~~. The [[Boskin Commission]] was organized by Moynihan~~ and ~~Packwood to deliberately break~~ the ~~[[CPI]] in a precise amount to avoid~~ the ~~US paying 1 trillion dollars over 10 years~~.		\|content=The [[Morals\|moral]] of the story to me is this:

			We can’t have outside folks calculating and theorizing while the inside economists are fudging and cooking the books.

	And ~~I promise you no leading economist will call bullshit to debate~~ this.		And calling me crazy won’t change a thing when this is finally understood. It’s simply institutional academic malpractice.
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	~~{{Tweet~~
	~~\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg~~
	~~\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1382366170766987269~~
	~~\|name=Eric Weinstein~~
	~~\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein~~
	~~\|username=EricRWeinstein~~
	\|content=It’s kind of an interesting puzzle. Why is it that a Harvard Professor (Mankiw) can say the truth which is that this was a conspiracy to cut entitlements. But the only two people who can CALCULATE a COLA for changing tastes are crazy for saying their work was deliberately buried?
	~~\|timestamp=4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021~~
	}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 1,797:		Line 1,790:
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~1382366173073793027~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1382366170766987269
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=It’s kind of an interesting puzzle. Why is it that a Harvard Professor (Mankiw) can say the truth which is that this was a conspiracy to cut entitlements. But the only two people who can CALCULATE a COLA for changing tastes are crazy for saying their work was deliberately buried?
			\|timestamp=4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021
			}}
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1382366171542876166
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=The ~~moral of~~ the ~~story~~ to ~~me is this:~~		\|content=In any event, I stand by my [[Claims\|claim]]. The [[Boskin Commission]] was organized by Moynihan and Packwood to deliberately break the [[CPI]] in a precise amount to avoid the US paying 1 trillion dollars over 10 years.

	~~We can’t have outside folks calculating and theorizing while the inside economists are fudging and cooking the books.~~		And I promise you no leading economist will call bullshit to debate this.

	And ~~calling me crazy won’t change a thing when~~ this ~~is finally understood. It’s simply institutional academic malpractice~~.
	\|timestamp=4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021		\|timestamp=4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021
	}}		}}

Pyrope: /* 2021 */

2026-03-18T03:10:54Z

2021

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:10, 18 March 2026
Line 1,766:		Line 1,766:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=In any event, I stand by my claim. The Boskin Commission was organized by Moynihan and Packwood to deliberately break the CPI in a precise amount to avoid the US paying 1 trillion dollars over 10 years.		\|content=In any event, I stand by my [[Claims\|claim]]. The [[Boskin Commission]] was organized by Moynihan and Packwood to deliberately break the [[CPI]] in a precise amount to avoid the US paying 1 trillion dollars over 10 years.

	And I promise you no leading economist will call bullshit to debate this.		And I promise you no leading economist will call bullshit to debate this.

Pyrope at 05:12, 14 February 2026

2026-02-14T05:12:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 14 February 2026
Line 4,550:		Line 4,550:
	[[Category:Mathematics]]		[[Category:Mathematics]]
	[[Category:Physics]]		[[Category:Physics]]
			[[Category:Portal Topics]]

Pyrope: /* 2018 */

2026-02-14T04:31:50Z

2018

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 14 February 2026
Line 943:		Line 943:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=6/ While physicists said the Universe was known to be chiral, I came to believe it was fundamentally symmetric. While we seemed to observe there being 3 or more generations of matter, I came to believe that there were but 2 true generations, plus an improbable "imposter." etc...		\|content=6/ While physicists said the Universe was known to be [[Chirality\|chiral]], I came to believe it was fundamentally symmetric. While we seemed to observe there being 3 or more generations of matter, I came to believe that there were but 2 true generations, plus an improbable "imposter." etc...
	\|timestamp=5:37 AM · Apr 2, 2018		\|timestamp=5:37 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
Line 961:		Line 961:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=8/ In short the April 1st "trick" that is being played on me is that I see a natural theory where chirality would be emergent (not fundamental), the number of true generations would be 2 not 3, there would be 2^4 and not 15 Fermions in a generation, and the geometries unify.		\|content=8/ In short the April 1st "trick" that is being played on me is that I see a natural theory where [[Chirality\|chirality]] would be emergent (not fundamental), the number of true generations would be 2 not 3, there would be 2^4 and not 15 Fermions in a generation, and the geometries unify.
	\|timestamp=5:49 AM · Apr 2, 2018		\|timestamp=5:49 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}

Pyrope: /* 2018 */

2026-02-14T04:22:33Z

2018

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 14 February 2026
Line 881:		Line 881:
	I was challenged by someone as to why I wasn't taking my own medicine referenced in the sub-tweet below this April 1st. Ok. Here goes.		I was challenged by someone as to why I wasn't taking my own medicine referenced in the sub-tweet below this April 1st. Ok. Here goes.

	What I believe about the universe that is quite different and why I don't talk about it much... https://t.co/~~RjqRGc5J9m~~		What I believe about the universe that is quite different and why I don't talk about it much...
	\|timestamp=4:54 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|quote=
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/979379894978150400
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=1/ APRIL FOOL'S SCIENCE: A proposal.

			Already bored of the coming "April Fools' Day!" pranks? Same here. And it's still March!

			Consider how we might re-purpose this resource for science. What if 1 day a year, we explored big ideas that'd normally result in professional shunning?
			\|timestamp=3:28 PM · Mar 29, 2018
			}}
			\|timestamp=4:54 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 890:		Line 904:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=2/ When I was around 16-17, I learned of a story that fascinated me much more than it seemed to captivate any other mathematician or physicist. It was the story of the discovery of the "Wu-Yang" dictionary around 1975-6, involving 3 super-minds: Jim Simons, CN Yang & Is Singer.		\|content=2/ When I was around 16-17, I learned of a story that fascinated me much more than it seemed to captivate any other mathematician or physicist. It was the story of the discovery of the [[Wu-Yang Dictionary\|"Wu-Yang" dictionary]] around 1975-6, involving 3 super-minds: [[Jim Simons]], [[CN Yang]] & [[Isadore Singer\|Is Singer]].
	\|timestamp=5:01 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:01 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 900:		Line 914:
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=3/ What was learned was that the Quantum of Planck, Bohr		\|content=3/ What was learned was that the Quantum of Planck, Bohr
	& Dirac was built on an internal Geometry, just as surely as General Relativity was built on an external geometry of space-time. Only the two geometries weren't the same! One was due to B Riemann; the other to C Ehresmann.		& [[Paul Dirac\|Dirac]] was built on an internal Geometry, just as surely as [[General Relativity]] was built on an external geometry of space-time. Only the two geometries weren't the same! One was due to [[Bernhard Riemann\|B Riemann]]; the other to [[Charles Ehresmann\|C Ehresmann]].
	\|timestamp=5:07 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:07 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 909:		Line 923:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=4/ Further the 2 geometries had different advantages. Riemann's geometry allowed you to compress the curvature & measure the 'torsion' while Ehresmann's encouraged "[[Gauge Theory\|Gauge ~~Rotation~~]]"... as long as you didn't do either of those two things. So I asked could the geometries be unified?		\|content=4/ Further the 2 geometries had different advantages. Riemann's geometry allowed you to compress the curvature & measure the 'torsion' while Ehresmann's encouraged "[[Gauge Theory\|Gauge]] Rotation"... as long as you didn't do either of those two things. So I asked could the geometries be unified?
	\|timestamp=5:14 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:14 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 918:		Line 932:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=5/ This would be a change in physics' main question. Instead of asking if Einstein's gravity could fit within Bohr's quantum, we could ask "Could Einstein's structures peculiar to Riemann's geometry be unified & rotated within Ehresmann's?" The answer was almost a 'No!'		\|content=5/ This would be a change in physics' main question. Instead of asking if [[Albert Einstein\|Einstein's]] gravity could fit within Bohr's quantum, we could ask "Could [[Albert Einstein\|Einstein's]] structures peculiar to Riemann's geometry be unified & rotated within Ehresmann's?" The answer was almost a 'No!'

	Almost.		Almost.
	\|timestamp=5:23 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:23 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 930:		Line 944:
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=6/ While physicists said the Universe was known to be chiral, I came to believe it was fundamentally symmetric. While we seemed to observe there being 3 or more generations of matter, I came to believe that there were but 2 true generations, plus an improbable "imposter." etc...		\|content=6/ While physicists said the Universe was known to be chiral, I came to believe it was fundamentally symmetric. While we seemed to observe there being 3 or more generations of matter, I came to believe that there were but 2 true generations, plus an improbable "imposter." etc...
	\|timestamp=5:37 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:37 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 939:		Line 953:
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=7/ In short a great many things had to be slightly off in our picture of the world in the 1980s to get the two geometric theories into a "Geometric Unity." Then in 1998, it was found that neutrinos weren't massless! This started to tip the scales towards the alterations I needed.		\|content=7/ In short a great many things had to be slightly off in our picture of the world in the 1980s to get the two geometric theories into a "Geometric Unity." Then in 1998, it was found that neutrinos weren't massless! This started to tip the scales towards the alterations I needed.
	\|timestamp=5:45 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:45 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 948:		Line 962:
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=8/ In short the April 1st "trick" that is being played on me is that I see a natural theory where chirality would be emergent (not fundamental), the number of true generations would be 2 not 3, there would be 2^4 and not 15 Fermions in a generation, and the geometries unify.		\|content=8/ In short the April 1st "trick" that is being played on me is that I see a natural theory where chirality would be emergent (not fundamental), the number of true generations would be 2 not 3, there would be 2^4 and not 15 Fermions in a generation, and the geometries unify.
	\|timestamp=5:49 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=5:49 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 956:		Line 970:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=9/ I spoke on this nearly 5 years ago; I have been slow to get back to it as I found the physics response bewildering. I have now decided to return to this work & to disposition it. So over the coming year, I'll begin pushing out "Geometric Unity" (as a non-physicist) to experts.		\|content=9/ I spoke on this nearly 5 years ago; I have been slow to get back to it as I found the physics response bewildering. I have now decided to return to this work & to disposition it. So over the coming year, I'll begin pushing out [[Theory of Geometric Unity\|"Geometric Unity"]] (as a non-physicist) to experts.
	\|~~media~~=ERW-X-post-958034414167982080-DUufH-dVAAAD8jD.jpg		\|timestamp=6:01 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	~~\|timestamp=6:01 AM · Apr 02, 2018~~		\|media1=ERW-X-post-958034414167982080-DUufH-dVAAAD8jD.jpg
	}}		}}
	\|timestamp=6:06 AM · Apr 02, 2018		\|timestamp=6:06 AM · Apr 2, 2018
	}}		}}

Pyrope: /* 2017 */

2026-02-14T04:15:13Z

2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 14 February 2026
Line 754:		Line 754:
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~834269582495928322~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/834274130207744000
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=~~No economist impressed me one-on-one more than [[Ken Arrow]]~~. ~~He was so generous with his genius helping us with [[Gauge Theory of Economics\|gauge theoretic economics]]. #rip https://t.co/oeRZ6KWOy4~~		\|content=@stogachess Sshhhhhh! But yes.
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~834274130207744000~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/834269582495928322
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=~~@stogachess Sshhhhhh! But yes~~.		\|content=No economist impressed me one-on-one more than [[Ken Arrow]]. He was so generous with his genius helping us with [[Gauge Theory of Economics\|gauge theoretic economics]]. #rip https://t.co/oeRZ6KWOy4
			\|timestamp=5:12 AM · Feb 22, 2017
			}}
	\|timestamp=5:30 AM · Feb 22, 2017		\|timestamp=5:30 AM · Feb 22, 2017
	}}
	~~\|timestamp=5:12 AM · Feb 22, 2017~~
	}}		}}

Pyrope: /* 2017 */

2026-02-14T04:13:57Z

2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 14 February 2026
Line 814:		Line 814:
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~928300831652298753~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928318499197353984
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=~~@StretchMcLurch I would reserve '~~[[~~Gauge Theory~~\|~~gauge group~~]]~~' for the infinite dimensional group of automorphisms of~~ the ~~vector bundle and 'structure group' for~~ the (~~usually) finite-dimensional structure preserving symmetry group of the individual fibers (~~ e.~~g. SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) of~~ the ~~Standard Model~~).		\|content=End/ An interpretation is that [[Ed Witten\|Witten]], the greatest living mathematical physicist, was indicating to us that it was only these abstractions that were likely to survive, while the instantiations (i.e. the exact equations we still use) would likely perish.

			A msg never recieived.
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~928305170764652545~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928296366853328896
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=~~@edsonedge "Physics and Geometry"~~		\|content=If I had but one paragraph to recommend as the most important in all of literature, it might well be this one. However, as you might imagine, unpacking it, could take up your entire life.
	~~\|timestamp=4:56 PM · Nov 08~~, ~~2017~~
	}}		[There is a 'flaw' in the paragraph. The word '[[Gauge Theory\|gauge]]' should be replaced by
	~~{{Tweet~~		'structure'.]
	~~\|image=Eric profile picture~~.~~jpg~~		\|media1=ERW-X-post-928296366853328896-DOE8P81U8AA_MBe.jpg
	~~\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928309737069821952~~		\|timestamp=4:21 PM · Nov 8, 2017
	\|~~name=Eric Weinstein~~
	~~\|usernameurl=https://x~~.~~com/EricRWeinstein~~
	~~\|username=EricRWeinstein~~
	\|~~content~~=~~@edsonedge I don’t think the thrust of the paper or lecture is anywhere near in importance. It would point you fruitlessly elsewhere~~.
	\|timestamp=5:14 PM · Nov 08, 2017
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 848:		Line 845:
	ii) refers to the Yang-Mills-Maxwell Equation for the other forces (only implicitly).</br>		ii) refers to the Yang-Mills-Maxwell Equation for the other forces (only implicitly).</br>
	iii) refers to the Dirac Equation for matter (yet again, only implicitly).		iii) refers to the Dirac Equation for matter (yet again, only implicitly).
	\|timestamp=5:40 PM · Nov 08, 2017		\|timestamp=5:40 PM · Nov 8, 2017
	}}		}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 856:		Line 853:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=2/ The Quantum (e.g. quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, quantum measurement, etc...) is relegated to a secondary status below the key geometric insights. This was likely done very subtly when the paper was given in the 1980s, as it was, and remains, a revolutionary idea.		\|content=2/ The Quantum (e.g. quantum mechanics, [[Quantum Field Theory\|quantum field theory]], quantum measurement, etc...) is relegated to a secondary status below the key geometric insights. This was likely done very subtly when the paper was given in the 1980s, as it was, and remains, a revolutionary idea.
	\|timestamp=5:43 PM · Nov ~~08, 2017~~		\|timestamp=5:43 PM · Nov 8, 2017
	}}
	~~{{Tweet~~
	~~\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg~~
	~~\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928318499197353984~~
	~~\|name=Eric Weinstein~~
	~~\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein~~
	~~\|username=EricRWeinstein~~
	\|content=End/ An interpretation is that Witten, the greatest living mathematical physicist, was indicating to us that it was only these abstractions that were likely to survive, while the instantiations (i.e. the exact equations we still use) would likely perish.

	~~A msg never recieived.~~
	~~\|timestamp=5:49 PM · Nov 08, 2017~~
	}}
	~~{{Tweet~~
	~~\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg~~
	~~\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/928326950778650624~~
	~~\|name=Eric Weinstein~~
	~~\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein~~
	~~\|username=EricRWeinstein~~
	~~\|content=@BadgerPundit Mine is the most hopeful potential escape from yours.~~
	~~\|timestamp=6:22 PM · Nov 08~~, 2017
	}}		}}
	\|timestamp=4:38 PM · Nov 08, 2017		\|timestamp=5:49 PM · Nov 8, 2017
	}}		}}

Pyrope: /* 2018 */

2026-02-14T04:01:57Z

2018

@@ Line 884: / Line 884: @@
 === 2018 ===
 {{Tweet
 |image=Eric profile picture.jpg
@@ Line 895: / Line 905: @@
 What I believe about the universe that is quite different and why I don't talk about it much... https://t.co/RjqRGc5J9m
-|thread=
+|timestamp=4:54 AM · Apr 02, 2018
 {{Tweet
 |image=Eric profile picture.jpg
@@ Line 972: / Line 983: @@
 |timestamp=6:01 AM · Apr 02, 2018
 }}
 |timestamp=6:06 AM · Apr 02, 2018
 }}

Pyrope: /* 2026 */

2026-02-14T03:59:30Z

2026

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 14 February 2026
Line 4,452:		Line 4,452:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=I want answers. What is the specific connection between Epstein, Harvard Mathematics, MIT and gravitational physics?		\|content=I want answers. What is the specific connection between [[Jeffrey Epstein\|Epstein]], Harvard Mathematics, MIT and gravitational physics?

	I was desperate to get it out of him. But he couldn’t even fake it. He had been coached.		I was desperate to get it out of him. But he couldn’t even fake it. He had been coached.
Line 4,466:		Line 4,466:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Fine. Have you noticed that there is exactly 1 person on earth claiming that Epstein desecrated our American flag by using it as a table cloth/undersheet?		\|content=Fine. Have you noticed that there is exactly 1 person on earth claiming that [[Jeffrey Epstein\|Epstein]] desecrated our American flag by using it as a table cloth/undersheet?
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 4,519:		Line 4,519:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=I’m telling you: Jeffrey Epstein was VERY focused on Physics and had information from Harvard/MIT about that subject at a level that doesn’t add up for a lay person.		\|content=I’m telling you: [[Jeffrey Epstein]] was VERY focused on Physics and had information from [[Harvard]]/MIT about that subject at a level that doesn’t add up for a lay person.

	Find who was manipulating THAT channel. Why are we throwing the American Science game like Shoeless Joe Jackson?		Find who was manipulating THAT channel. Why are we throwing the American Science game like Shoeless Joe Jackson?