Consensus - Revision history

Pyrope at 04:50, 19 March 2026

2026-03-19T04:50:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 19 March 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}

			== Related Pages ==

			* [[Anti-Expert]]
			* [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)]]
			* [[Distributed Denial of Cognition Attack]]
			* [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]]


	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]
	[[Category:DISC]]		[[Category:DISC]]

Aardvark at 22:07, 14 May 2023

2023-05-14T22:07:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 14 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Stub}}~~
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	'''''Just because a large number of well credentialed experts believe something in common doesn't mean that it's necessarily wrong, but if they've reached consensus that's the way to bet.''' Somehow, people have to learn that "consensus" is a huge problem.''		'''''Just because a large number of well credentialed experts believe something in common doesn't mean that it's necessarily wrong, but if they've reached consensus that's the way to bet.''' Somehow, people have to learn that "consensus" is a huge problem.''
Line 9:		Line 8:

	{{#widget:YouTube\|id=8LPwyy4scAc\|start=5137}}		{{#widget:YouTube\|id=8LPwyy4scAc\|start=5137}}

			{{Stub}}

	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]
	[[Category:DISC]]		[[Category:DISC]]

Pyrope at 22:45, 11 September 2021

2021-09-11T22:45:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 11 September 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{Stub}}
	There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self. ~[https://~~tim~~.~~blog/2016/01~~/~~13/eric-weinstein/ Eric on~~ Tim Ferriss]		<blockquote>
			'''''Just because a large number of well credentialed experts believe something in common doesn't mean that it's necessarily wrong, but if they've reached consensus that's the way to bet.''' Somehow, people have to learn that "consensus" is a huge problem.''

			''There’s no arithmetic consensus, because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there '''is''' a Washington consensus. There '''is''' a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that, in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self.''

			-'''Eric Weinstein''' on [https://youtu.be/8LPwyy4scAc?t=5137 The Tim Ferriss Show]
			</blockquote>

			{{#widget:YouTube\|id=8LPwyy4scAc\|start=5137}}

	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]
	[[Category:DISC]]		[[Category:DISC]]

Pyrope at 22:50, 2 September 2021

2021-09-02T22:50:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 2 September 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self. ~[https://tim.blog/2016/01/13/eric-weinstein/ Eric on Tim Ferriss]		There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self. ~[https://tim.blog/2016/01/13/eric-weinstein/ Eric on Tim Ferriss]

	[[Category:~~Ericisms~~]]		[[Category:Concepts]]
	[[Category:DISC]]		[[Category:DISC]]

Aardvark at 23:53, 13 February 2021

2021-02-13T23:53:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 13 February 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	[[Category:Ericisms]]		[[Category:Ericisms]]
			[[Category:DISC]]

Aardvark at 21:34, 1 February 2021

2021-02-01T21:34:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 1 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Stub}}
	There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self. ~[https://tim.blog/2016/01/13/eric-weinstein/ Eric on Tim Ferriss]		There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self. ~[https://tim.blog/2016/01/13/eric-weinstein/ Eric on Tim Ferriss]

	[[Category:Ericisms]]		[[Category:Ericisms]]

Aardvark: Created page with "There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully..."

2021-01-16T04:14:32Z

Created page with "There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully..."

New page

There’s no arithmetic consensus because it doesn’t require a consensus. But there is a Washington consensus. There is a climate consensus. “Consensus” is how we bully people into pretending that there’s nothing to see, move along, everyone. And so I think that in part, you should start to learn that people don’t naturally come to high levels of agreement unless something is either absolutely clear, in which case consensus isn’t present, or there’s an implied threat of violence to livelihood or self. ~[https://tim.blog/2016/01/13/eric-weinstein/ Eric on Tim Ferriss]

[[Category:Ericisms]]