Chirality - Revision history

Aardvark: Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"

2026-05-05T21:17:35Z

Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein"

Show changes

Pyrope: /* 2026 */

2026-02-14T05:09:21Z

2026

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 14 February 2026
Line 1,873:		Line 1,873:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=@grok @nu_phases @skdh Sorry. Witten and Susskind and Gross and Motl and Kaku etc. etc. are COLLEGIAL???!?		\|content=@grok @nu_phases @skdh Sorry. [[Ed Witten\|Witten]] and [[Lenny Susskind\|Susskind]] and [[David Gross\|Gross]] and Motl and [[Michio Kaku\|Kaku]] etc. etc. are COLLEGIAL???!?

	I’m all ears @grok.		I’m all ears @grok.
Line 1,890:		Line 1,890:
	Sorry, @grok. Disappointed. Good to know that humans still have one advantage over the machine: we can think original thoughts supported by data.		Sorry, @grok. Disappointed. Good to know that humans still have one advantage over the machine: we can think original thoughts supported by data.

	Witten is not a collegial scientist.		[[Ed Witten\|Witten]] is not a collegial scientist.</br>
	Nor is Susskind.		Nor is [[Lenny Susskind\|Susskind]].</br>
	Nor is Kaku.		Nor is [[Michio Kaku\|Kaku]].</br>
	Nor is Motl.		Nor is Motl.</br>
	Etc		Etc

Line 1,905:		Line 1,905:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=@grok @nu_phases @skdh Here. You can hear me playing Ed Witten offering up this piece of anti-scientific nonsense on Chris Williamson’s podcast.		\|content=@grok @nu_phases @skdh Here. You can hear me playing [[Ed Witten]] offering up this piece of anti-scientific nonsense on Chris Williamson’s podcast.

	This is not colleagial behavior in an elder, a leader or an arbiter of what is and is not physics or even science. https://t.co/DyaE72GlEN		This is not colleagial behavior in an elder, a leader or an arbiter of what is and is not physics or even science. https://t.co/DyaE72GlEN
Line 1,916:		Line 1,916:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=I’d prioritize owning up to the TOGIT anti-science cult needing to being purged.		\|content=I’d prioritize owning up to the [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|TOGIT]] anti-science cult needing to being purged.

	Failure happens in science. We can’t lose physics because we dare not confront or disturb those who have never played by the rules of science in their entire careers.		Failure happens in science. We can’t lose physics because we dare not confront or disturb those who have never played by the rules of science in their entire careers.
Line 1,952:		Line 1,952:
	\|content=@nu_phases @skdh @grok Many things have happened in general physics in 50 years:		\|content=@nu_phases @skdh @grok Many things have happened in general physics in 50 years:

	Experimental		Experimental</br>
	Mathematical		Mathematical</br>
	Topological		Topological</br>
	Condensed Matter		Condensed Matter</br>
	Astrophysical		Astrophysical</br>
	Cosmological		Cosmological</br>
	QFT as a toolkit framework		QFT as a toolkit framework</br>
	Etc.		Etc.

	That’s not what we are discussing, is it?		That’s not what we are discussing, is it?

	We are discussing the SM plus GR Lagrangians no?		We are discussing the [[Standard Model\|SM]] plus [[General Relativity\|GR]] Lagrangians no?
	\|timestamp=8:27 PM · Jan 03, 2026		\|timestamp=8:27 PM · Jan 03, 2026
	}}		}}
Line 1,980:		Line 1,980:
	The problem isn’t any of this.		The problem isn’t any of this.

	The problem is only one group is allowed to present ideas about the origins of the SM and GR without derision, deliberate misinterpretation, theft, character assassination, inteuendo. This is “The Only Game In Town” or TOGIT cult. Some of us have tried to challenge this group scientifically for more than 40 years.		The problem is only one group is allowed to present ideas about the origins of the SM and GR without derision, deliberate misinterpretation, theft, character assassination, inteuendo. This is [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|“The Only Game In Town” or TOGIT]] cult. Some of us have tried to challenge this group scientifically for more than 40 years.

	The trouble is when you say “Let’s hear from all the people with ideas that directly contradict the String Theory leaders.”		The trouble is when you say “Let’s hear from all the people with ideas that directly contradict the String Theory leaders.”
Line 1,988:		Line 1,988:
	And everyone who dares to say this is scapegoated.		And everyone who dares to say this is scapegoated.

	The QG leaders all failed us Daniel. They will never break the logjam that they created and cannot acknowledge.		The [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] leaders all failed us Daniel. They will never break the logjam that they created and cannot acknowledge.

	Their critics would. But they cannot get close as they are STILL not allowed to question the failed program as members in good standing inside the system.		Their critics would. But they cannot get close as they are STILL not allowed to question the failed program as members in good standing inside the system.
Line 2,005:		Line 2,005:
	\|content=@nu_phases @skdh @grok Something is not right in your picture:		\|content=@nu_phases @skdh @grok Something is not right in your picture:

	“But part of the problem is your reframing QG = all fundamental physics.”		“But part of the problem is your reframing [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] = all fundamental physics.”

	I’m saying the opposite. I’m saying that the QG people made all of fundamental physics about their view of quantizing gravity. I’m saying that was the catastrophe.		I’m saying the opposite. I’m saying that the [[Quantum Gravity\|QG]] people made all of fundamental physics about their view of quantizing gravity. I’m saying that was the catastrophe.
	\|timestamp=10:19 PM · Jan 03, 2026		\|timestamp=10:19 PM · Jan 03, 2026
	}}		}}
Line 2,020:		Line 2,020:
	No one smart wants to complain. They want to do work, have it evaluated and get credit for their ideas so they can do more work and have a good life.		No one smart wants to complain. They want to do work, have it evaluated and get credit for their ideas so they can do more work and have a good life.

	The complainers are those trying to say “No one gets to give seminars about the origin of chirality or 3 generations unless it comes out of The Only Game In Town:		The complainers are those trying to say “No one gets to give seminars about the origin of chirality or 3 generations unless it comes out of [[The Only Game in Town (TOGIT)\|The Only Game In Town]]:
	\|timestamp=10:22 PM · Jan 03, 2026		\|timestamp=10:22 PM · Jan 03, 2026
	}}		}}
Line 2,150:		Line 2,150:
	These models have 3 features:		These models have 3 features:

	A) Symmetic Laws		A) Symmetic Laws</br>
	B) Symmetric Boundary Conditions		B) Symmetric Boundary Conditions</br>
	C) Emergent Chiral Decoupling		C) Emergent Chiral Decoupling

Pyrope: /* 2025 */

2026-02-14T05:03:52Z

2025

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 14 February 2026
Line 1,331:		Line 1,331:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=@karch_andreas @JosephPConlon Address that lecture to our colleague first and you will find an open heart: ~~https://t.co/AlCEYL29Sy~~		\|content=@karch_andreas @JosephPConlon Address that lecture to our colleague first and you will find an open heart:
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1979651326322839813-G3kiY5eXMAAkuNs.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1979651326322839813-G3kiY5eXMAAkuNs.jpg
	\|timestamp=8:50 PM · Oct 18, 2025		\|timestamp=8:50 PM · Oct 18, 2025
Line 1,360:		Line 1,360:
	That is		That is

	2(X^4)_Left * 16_Left(F^{10})		2(X^4)_Left * 16_Left(F^{10})</br>
	+2(X^4) _Right *16_Right(F^{10}) =64_Left(Y^{14})		+2(X^4) _Right *16_Right(F^{10}) =64_Left(Y^{14})

Pyrope: /* 2023 */

2026-02-14T04:59:41Z

2023

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 14 February 2026
Line 511:		Line 511:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=@olivia_p_walker This? Chanda is a long time colleague & acquaintance from years back. We have disagreed before, but have never had harsh words that I recall. We both come from progressive family backgrounds so there is commonality. I think we disagree markedly on DEI as it is current conceived. ~~https://t.co/u9aul8jwwh~~		\|content=@olivia_p_walker This? Chanda is a long time colleague & acquaintance from years back. We have disagreed before, but have never had harsh words that I recall. We both come from progressive family backgrounds so there is commonality. I think we disagree markedly on DEI as it is current conceived.
	\|media=ERW-X-post-~~1620331273091940352~~-~~FnySs7yaAAELtUM~~.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1620304616180297729-Fnx6dT6aEAIrFwG.jpg
	\|thread=		\|thread=
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
Line 533:		Line 533:
	I think I understand this proposition. And I accept!		I think I understand this proposition. And I accept!

	And I'm happy to do an extra talk on EDI for FREE. My complexion is fair.		And I'm happy to do an extra talk on EDI for FREE. My complexion is fair.
	\|timestamp=5:46 AM · Jan 31, 2023		\|timestamp=5:46 AM · Jan 31, 2023
	}}		}}
Line 544:		Line 544:
	\|content=But I am hearing from some terrific researchers that they are SCARED in their workplaces to talk science now for fear of being targeted by science activists. And it has me concerned. We can't let Black physicists be intimidated by politics! Let me know?		\|content=But I am hearing from some terrific researchers that they are SCARED in their workplaces to talk science now for fear of being targeted by science activists. And it has me concerned. We can't let Black physicists be intimidated by politics! Let me know?

	https://t.co/~~wdgRabDGZr~~		https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/19/us/james-webb-telescope-gay-rights.html
	\|timestamp=5:46 AM · Jan 31, 2023		\|timestamp=5:46 AM · Jan 31, 2023
	}}		}}
Line 555:		Line 555:
	\|content=In any event, I'd be most interested to talk on the following two topics:		\|content=In any event, I'd be most interested to talk on the following two topics:

	3 Generations of fundamental Chiral Fermions vs 2 Fundamental Families + 1 Emergent non-chiral SM Gen plus two exotic families which become emergently Chiral.		3 Generations of fundamental [[Chirality\|Chiral Fermions]] vs 2 Fundamental Families + 1 Emergent non-chiral SM Gen plus two exotic families which become emergently [[Chirality\|Chiral]].

	Pati-Salam & GR: What is the linkage?		Pati-Salam & GR: What is the linkage?
Line 575:		Line 575:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=For those of you saying you are blocked, here is the tweet I am to which I am responding so I don’t misrepresent Chanda’s position: ~~https://t.co/Cs7oUacp8s~~		\|content=For those of you saying you are blocked, here is the tweet I am to which I am responding so I don’t misrepresent Chanda’s position:
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1620304616180297729-Fnx6dT6aEAIrFwG.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1620304616180297729-Fnx6dT6aEAIrFwG.jpg
	\|timestamp=6:14 AM · Jan 31, 2023		\|timestamp=6:14 AM · Jan 31, 2023

Pyrope: /* 2022 */

2026-02-14T04:54:03Z

2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 14 February 2026
Line 303:		Line 303:
	Do stay tuned…		Do stay tuned…

	Happy 4th all! ~~https://t.co/7Z1zik8EDL~~		Happy 4th all!
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023478604423169-FW15K3gUEAAROMs.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023478604423169-FW15K3gUEAAROMs.jpg
	\|thread=		\|thread=
Line 324:		Line 324:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Oddly, sectors that gives us the four fundamental forces are not considered fundamentally unnatural. Nor are the sectors that given us matter. They seem like natural structures, that at worst were “defaced” with mysterious graffiti (internal quantum numbers, multiple copies..). ~~https://t.co/kCrgGWYxXU~~		\|content=Oddly, sectors that gives us the four fundamental forces are not considered fundamentally unnatural. Nor are the sectors that given us matter. They seem like natural structures, that at worst were “defaced” with mysterious graffiti (internal quantum numbers, multiple copies..).
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023456445919232-FW15Jl2UIAAZAfL.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023456445919232-FW15Jl2UIAAZAfL.jpg
	\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022		\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022
Line 334:		Line 334:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=So why is the Higgs still under suspicion well after it has been found? It’s hard to say exactly. In some sense, you can see the rest of the field theory of the Standard Model as being differential geometric in origin with our best comparison of the Higgs sector being Yang-Mills. ~~https://t.co/J5pPU8emzj~~		\|content=So why is the Higgs still under suspicion well after it has been found? It’s hard to say exactly. In some sense, you can see the rest of the field theory of the Standard Model as being differential geometric in origin with our best comparison of the Higgs sector being Yang-Mills.
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023460342403072-FW15J49VsAAfNrj.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023460342403072-FW15J49VsAAfNrj.jpg
	\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022		\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022
Line 344:		Line 344:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=If I started talking jargon about a “sector governed by relativistic second order Euler-Lagrange equations, subject to quartic interactions, and coupling to matter fields…” you wouldn’t be able to tell if it was the natural YangMills sector or supposedly unnatural Higgs sector. ~~https://t.co/YO6a25REbM~~		\|content=If I started talking jargon about a “sector governed by relativistic second order Euler-Lagrange equations, subject to quartic interactions, and coupling to matter fields…” you wouldn’t be able to tell if it was the natural YangMills sector or supposedly unnatural Higgs sector.
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023464473808896-FW15KG6UUAAh1oi.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023464473808896-FW15KG6UUAAh1oi.jpg
	\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022		\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022
Line 354:		Line 354:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=Thus the unnatural nature of the Higgs sector cannot be coming from its analytic description. It is simply that we have learned to see force as coming from geometry we know, while the supremely geometric seeming Higgs comes not from differential geometry, but from our desire. ~~https://t.co/u6xFlfNGPL~~		\|content=Thus the unnatural nature of the Higgs sector cannot be coming from its analytic description. It is simply that we have learned to see force as coming from geometry we know, while the supremely geometric seeming Higgs comes not from differential geometry, but from our desire.
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023468542345216-FW15KW0VEAEJF0s.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023468542345216-FW15KW0VEAEJF0s.jpg
	\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022		\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022
Line 364:		Line 364:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=To quote the Architect’s speech, you would think he was describing the life of the Higgs Sector (as Neo) within the Standard Model of Particle Theory (as TheMatrix). The Higgs Mechanism is the remainder of an unbalanced (chiral Weak nuclear force) equation forbidding all mass. ~~https://t.co/Yvd8eGoFqx~~		\|content=To quote the Architect’s speech, you would think he was describing the life of the Higgs Sector (as Neo) within the Standard Model of Particle Theory (as TheMatrix). The Higgs Mechanism is the remainder of an unbalanced (chiral Weak nuclear force) equation forbidding all mass.
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023473193754626-FW15KlhVsAEiAAd.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1544023473193754626-FW15KlhVsAEiAAd.jpg
	\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022		\|timestamp=6:20 PM · Jul 04, 2022
Line 440:		Line 440:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=*you’re		\|content=<nowiki>*</nowiki>you’re
	\|timestamp=3:44 PM · Aug 24, 2022		\|timestamp=3:44 PM · Aug 24, 2022
	}}		}}

Pyrope: /* 2021 */

2026-02-14T04:52:26Z

2021

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 14 February 2026
Line 215:		Line 215:
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=The original tweet. Stripped of the name of its author as I have no need to use it. ~~https://t.co/SDVGC5j5JI~~		\|content=The original tweet. Stripped of the name of its author as I have no need to use it.
	\|media=ERW-X-post-1432468941192916996-E-Em6BRUcAAM04f.jpg		\|media=ERW-X-post-1432468941192916996-E-Em6BRUcAAM04f.jpg
	\|thread=		\|thread=
			{{Tweet
			\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
			\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1432461218556432384
			\|name=Eric Weinstein
			\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
			\|username=EricRWeinstein
			\|content=This is the golden age of stupid.

			<nowiki></nowiki>Many are angry with me that because I simply can’t or won’t pay attention to detail, I have relentlessly pushed “horse-dewormer” and refused to vaccinate myself.

			Which gives a fair picture of the level of my Internet detractors’ critiques.

			https://x.com/J1OWDE/status/1432447323049693188
			\|timestamp=9:52 PM · Aug 30, 2021
			}}
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
Line 233:		Line 248:
	{{Tweet		{{Tweet
	\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg		\|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
	\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/~~1432461218556432384~~		\|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1432461221161148417
	\|name=Eric Weinstein		\|name=Eric Weinstein
	\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein		\|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
	\|username=EricRWeinstein		\|username=EricRWeinstein
	\|content=~~This~~ is the ~~golden age of stupid.~~		\|content=And it goes on forever. Of course none of this is in any way true. But it’s InternetTrue. Which is different. Like the bold claim that I always supported Woke until it turned on me.

	Many are angry with me that ~~because~~ I ~~simply can’t or won’t pay attention to detail, I have relentlessly pushed “horse-dewormer” and refused to vaccinate myself~~.

	~~Which gives a fair picture of~~ the ~~level~~ of ~~my Internet detractors’ critiques.~~		Anyone else willing to share the fake cloud of total bullshit that follows you around Twitter? 🙏
	\|timestamp=9:52 PM · Aug 30, 2021		\|timestamp=9:52 PM · Aug 30, 2021
	}}		}}

Pyrope: Created page with "== On X == === 2013 === {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/341505241394589697 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein |username=EricRWeinstein |content=I was indeed surprised by a questioner asking about chiral anomalies in non-chiral SO(10) theories who didn't think SO(10) anomaly free. |timestamp=10:42 AM · Jun 03, 2013 }} === 2018 === {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |na..."

2026-02-14T04:45:29Z

Created page with "== On X == === 2013 === {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/341505241394589697 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein |username=EricRWeinstein |content=I was indeed surprised by a questioner asking about chiral anomalies in non-chiral SO(10) theories who didn't think SO(10) anomaly free. |timestamp=10:42 AM · Jun 03, 2013 }} === 2018 === {{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |na..."

Show changes