Editing I’ve Got a Good Feeling About This

{{stub}}
[[File:ERW-X-post-1986803710551290047-G5KLccDboAAWxiM.jpg|thumb]]


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803710551290047
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=And @grok, can you make this argument understandable to anyone claiming to be confused by this analogy? Thx partner.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803710551290047
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Here is what is wrong with [[Effective Field Theory (EFT)|Effective Field Theory]], to me, as explained by Wheel Of Fortune.

Imagine this puzzle was the information at some low energy ([[Standard Model]]), and the number of letters left to find matched the orders of magnitude from where we are to (UV) completion.

[[Effective Field Theory (EFT)|Effective Field Theory]] says “Be modest and learn to live with lack of unique UV completion and a rambling effective [[Standard Model]] so many orders of energy away from the Planck Scale because it can’t be guessed from so far away.”
|media1=ERW-X-post-1986803710551290047-G5KLccDboAAWxiM.jpg
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=arivero-profile-VWOtSvhz.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/arivero/status/1986796150733640121
|name=Alejandro Rivero
|usernameurl=https://x.com/arivero
|username=arivero
|content=@EricRWeinstein it could be interesting if you clarify your position on the [[Effective Field Theory (EFT)|EFT]] doctrine. To me it is basically a "planck-scale first" doctrine, that tells that any experimental result is not important, and than renormalizability of theories is just an amusement.
|timestamp=2:01 PM · Nov 7, 2025
}}
|timestamp=2:31 PM · Nov 7, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803714179633663
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Theory of Geometric Unity|GU]] says: “That is eminently reasonable & sober, and is thus good solid science. Now get this defeatist mindset the hell away from me, go peer review each other, and hold my beer. Send lawyers, guns & money: let’s get back to American Cowboy science.”

🤠
{{#widget:YouTube|id=QqIE2-FUpKg}}
|timestamp=2:31 PM · Nov 7, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1986803710551290047
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=When it comes to Ed Witten/Lenny Susskind vs John F. Donoghue/[[Ken Wilson]], I’m just not in that game. Not my colleagues. Not my rodeo.

I belong to the Bruce Willis school of fundamental physics:  

“I was always kinda partial to Roy Rodgers actually.”
{{#widget:YouTube|id=BSRrzrQtmto}}
|timestamp=2:41 PM · Nov 7, 2025
}}
|timestamp=2:54 PM · Nov 7, 2025
}}


{{#widget:YouTube|id=QqIE2-FUpKg}}


== Related Pages ==
* [[Theory of Geometric Unity]]
* [[Early is another name for wrong]]
* [[Geometric Unity Predictions]]
* [[You Know You’re in GU When]]
* [[Ken Wilson]]
* [[Effective Field Theory (EFT)]]

[[Category:Ericisms]]
[[Category:Geometric Unity]]
[[Category:Physics]]