Editing Spacetime (section)

=== 2023 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1619727377097170946
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@martinmbauer Was thinking the same.

But I think it is because an enormous part of the hep-th arxiv is disingenuous physics. “Sterile neutrinos from Non-commutative spacetime SUSY phenomenology over characteristic p not equal to 2.” could be a paper in a field gone mad. Or it could be a joke.
|timestamp=4:01 PM · Jan 29, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1623353348438249472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=The irremovable singularities of GR indicate that Einstein is an intermediate theory. It’s NOT final. And I wouldn’t want to face an adversary that knew the ultimate theory while I was still back in spacetime thinking.

Spacetime may not be hackable,
but it’s successors may be.🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1623353346395602946
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I am worried that should any entity get a Post Einsteinian map, those with only GR will be “owned” by those with the advantage. Think neutrons. 

GU is by its nature, a post Einsteinian theory. It recovers spacetime from a more general structure.

https://t.co/WrK8nnqop7
|timestamp=4:09 PM · Feb 08, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1623353344344596491
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I want to use the argument made to make a point. “Light years” is a mathematical concept. Newtonian gravitation &amp; Einstein’s general relativity are our past &amp; current mathematical maps of the physical “territory”.

The Map ≠ The Territory.

I’m focused on post-Einsteinian maps.
|timestamp=4:09 PM · Feb 08, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:09 PM · Feb 08, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638587977873100800
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@ldgaetano Thank you.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638575795726876672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=As I have said in public, I find it EXTREMELY difficult to conceptualize multiple temporal dimensions. Just because I can see that they are there in my model, does not mean  I am smart enough to understand their consequences. Sorry to disappoint. Try Itzhak Bars at USC?

Be well.
|timestamp=4:18 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638575793185099782
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I don’t know how to answer. I believe that the world beyond Einstein does not have a 1,3 metric where that 1 means a single future.

If I’m correct, the world is 7,7 or 5,9 pulled back to 1,3. So I decline to answer: I don’t know how to think about my own model’s pasts/futures.
|timestamp=4:18 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638578352989806595
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Perhaps one simple thing I might add is that only with one temporal dimension do boundary conditions become initial conditions. Boundary conditions are more general and Ultra Hyperbolic equations can be defined so that Hyperbolic relativistic equations are a quirky special case.
|timestamp=4:28 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638583877781561346
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@danielbmarkham I alreadys will.
|timestamp=4:50 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638586542745882624
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@ldgaetano Gimel pulls back field content native to Y back to X. Gimel^{1,3} does the pulling back of the data (sections over Y). It is the stylus that samples the record Y^{7,7} (or Y^{5,9} in the second GU variant that is physical) and plays it back. In GU, spacetime is just the Victrola.
|timestamp=5:00 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1638587024738492416
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@ldgaetano I don’t usually reply here because it is not the right forum. I know that this is super clunky. Forgive me the LaTeX pseudo code if it is not clear.
|timestamp=5:02 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Mar 22, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1645480868755181569
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@mikestaub @lexfridman @edfrenkel How was?!? My brain and player don’t do that.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1645479297321414662
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=An hour ago, @lexfridman dropped a nearly 4 hour interview with one of the world’s leading minds, Berkeley Mathematics Professor @edfrenkel. Thus no one has listened to it fully. 

Ed is genius &amp; always amazing. I recommend a follow &amp; listen, sight unseen:
https://t.co/E7zaTWaXR8
|timestamp=5:30 PM · Apr 10, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1645479982024790017
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Resist_CBDC @lexfridman @edfrenkel I will try to listen to it tonight. Just saw it.
|timestamp=5:32 PM · Apr 10, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1645480381838430209
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@LudisCharta @lexfridman @edfrenkel Love that spacetime engineering!
|timestamp=5:34 PM · Apr 10, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1645480505893322753
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@grimsr3ap3r79 @lexfridman @edfrenkel Ed is a beast.
|timestamp=5:34 PM · Apr 10, 2023
}}
|timestamp=5:36 PM · Apr 10, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1669014926793510913
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=What it sounds like to me:

A) People who read Flatland but did not familiarize themselves with field theory.

B) People actually meaning “decoupled fields” to explain co-located matter which is not detected.

C) People confusing travel using extra dimensions for residing in ED.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1669014924704780288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=For the record, I have no idea what people mean when they say these things. I am genuinely focused on the accessibility of extra dimensions, both spatial and temporal…and I have zero clue what people are talking about with “aliens from other dimensions”. It sounds like nonsense.
|timestamp=4:12 PM · Jun 14, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1669014930014752771
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=If the idea of secret undetectable matter that is right here with us but is not detected in normal life by ordinary humans is exciting to you, but sounds far fetched, I highly recommend studying neutrino physics. It is mind blowing. I promise you. And it is real.

Ok. Back to 👽.
|timestamp=4:12 PM · Jun 14, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1669014928387366912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=That’s not to say I can’t imagine a field theory where support is localized away from wherever we fit spacetime. But the language used about extra dimensions is not that of field theory. It’s more that of Sci-Fi. So, at the surface it doesn’t seem  much like a physics notion imo.
|timestamp=4:12 PM · Jun 14, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:12 PM · Jun 14, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1677750149869883392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Which is why we got:

Low Energy Spacetime Supersymmetry

Superlative Index Numbers replacing the Konus Index

Contradictory directives on Masks

“The Great Moderation” before 2008

Labor Shortages claimed in Market Economies

Vioxx

Anti-Biological Redefinitions of Gender

The Reproducibility Crisis in Peer Reviewed Literature

Citation Cartels

An admonition to ask no questions about the Wuhan Institute of Virology

The Death of Sociobiology at the hands of Marxists

40 yrs of modern String Theory 

70 years of Quantum Gravity

The food pyramid
|timestamp=6:43 PM · Jul 08, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1686669382439587840
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=This is a serious question: do modern scientists themselves think like scientists? My experience is “no”. But i got there by roaming around academic research and realizing they cannot **afford** to think like scientists. 

Try asking researchers the following rather obvious questions to see the effect for yourself: 

What are male and female?

What can we say about the possible origin theories of COVID?

How are there labor shortages of scientists  in Market Economies???

What is the strength of the argument for the necessity of directly Quantizing Gravity if spacetime is not fundamental?

How do humans behave under evolutionary incentives and what really happened to sociobiology?

Is worrying about cognitive impacts of microcephaly a form of phrenology?

Have standardized tests been useful in predicting success in science?

Why is CPI a number but weather a field?

How do we evaluate the concentrated investment in String Theory/Quantum Gravity at the expense of rival approaches as our basic theory of physics?

Can we use Carnegie stages to evaluate where abortion rights should begin and end?

When innumerable nearly unbelievable conspiracies have been discovered, why demonize all those who consider that there could be more left to be found?

Why are humans not generically  modeled as having changing tastes in markets, nor diminishing returns to money (except in the theory of risk on alternate Tuesdays)?

Did science work *better* before the modern Peer Review revolution of the 1960s?

Why do so many of our leading theoretical particle physicists not have concrete predictions about our physical world and really instead work on toy theories almost exclusively?
|timestamp=9:24 AM · Aug 02, 2023
}}