Editing Markets (section)

=== 2018 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/957782530337329152
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@vyodaiken Then we have achieved parity. Be well.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=1/ The "Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula, Disagreeables, &amp; the "No-Living-Heroes" thy. Consider adjectives: 

Embattled
Controversial
Divisive
Reclusive
Provocative
Struggling
Right-Wing
Eccentric
Self-styled
Far-Left
Recovering
Disgraced
Self-Promoting
Free-thinking
Volatile
etc.
|timestamp=4:39 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955119083095171072
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=2/ These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt) campaigns.
|timestamp=4:45 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955120622123720704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=3/ So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached. https://t.co/leVhC7eAmc
|media=ERW-X-post-955120622123720704-DUFE4AfVMAA8Sxx.jpg
|timestamp=4:51 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955121503653085184
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=4/ Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor. 

So...how can that be?
|timestamp=4:54 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955124432543993856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=5/ Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick. 

The point is that real humans don’t talk like this. https://t.co/bfXGG8EMEu
|media1=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImTEVoAAtgWY.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImTDVoAEZMnL.jpg
|media3=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImUkVoAAf0Bk.jpg
|media4=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImUlVQAAcbBH.jpg
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955128183816253440
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=6/ My point here is that our minds are programmed to recognize the “Gated Institutional Narrative” or GIN and to take our emotional instructions from it. This is Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak: Adjective-Profession-Target. 

Or so asserts self-styled Internet personality @EricRWeinstein.
|timestamp=5:21 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955129704385662976
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=7/ So who are the targets? Men and  women who are off the charts on the Big-5 psychometric for disagreeability. These people are the pool from which our greatest Nobel Laureates &amp; even heroes were once drawn.

And right now the internet is having a bull market in disagreeability.
|timestamp=5:27 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955131952377442304
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=8/ This brings us to one of my most controversial theories: Ever since Lindbergh’s attempt to keep the US out of WWII, our institutions have fought against us having ANY living heroes with self-minted credibility. 

This leaves a vacuum filled by acceptable institutional figures. https://t.co/F20C61HOAE
|media=ERW-X-post-955131952377442304-DUFPcROU0AEURlO.jpg
|timestamp=5:36 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955134621078835200
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=9/ The lesson learned from Lindbergh appears to be that Mavericks are too dangerous to institutions...and in the case of Lindbergh that made some sense. But what about a John Lennon? Frances Kelsey? Charlie Chaplin? Paul Robeson? Frank Wilkinson? Katharine Hepburn?
|timestamp=5:46 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955136753454624768
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=10/ Here’s the punchline: There are suddenly way way too many disagreeable individual voices to be found for people trying to escape from the constant cognitive abuse of our institutions, which want our co-dependence on them. 

So something new *has* to happen. 

Here goes...
|timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955138512214306816
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=/11 

Either:

A) The spell of the GIN breaks and we have lots of real self-minted heroes again.

B) Disagreeables like Jordan Peterson, Camille Paglia, Nassim Taleb, Douglas Murray, Claire Lehman, etc... all get taken out. 

C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables.
|timestamp=6:02 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955140105034809344
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=/END My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb. https://t.co/2XY12Mu3q1
|media1=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21xVAAAQKrN.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21zVMAAz01E.jpg
|timestamp=6:08 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/957693652582592512
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@vyodaiken You aren’t getting it. He had been a hero from aviation. The fact that he had unrelated troubling loyalties and views was a *real* problem. The fix to that problem constitutes a *different* real problem.
|timestamp=7:15 PM · Jan 28, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/957718424012013568
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@vyodaiken Woah. I get it now. You want to play the Cathy Newman strawman game! Very well. If we must:

Wait! I mentioned Paul Robeson too. And you didn’t condemn him immediately in the strongest terms?!
For shame! He supported a mass murderer: Stalin! 

Checkmate:

https://t.co/ZnFcPhFuTe
|timestamp=8:54 PM · Jan 28, 2018
}}
|timestamp=1:08 AM · Jan 29, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/961673214383464448
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content="Today, the dollar surged against equities" said no financial reporter ever in describing a market sell-off. Beware of cheer-leading journalism. No "long only" portfolio is ever diversified. Long-only means being short a single security that you're encouraged not to think about. https://t.co/aZ8EjL3d4s
|media=ERW-X-post-961673214383464448-DViLV14UMAEozum.jpg
|timestamp=6:48 PM · Feb 08, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/962553090816688129
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@naval I agree that it can get messy when we step away from that which markets can fairly price. But production of public goods, the value of kin work (dominated by females), and the lack of recognition accruing to many in STEM make it imperative that we venture onto the slippery slope.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/962550879130861568
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@naval Hmm. I would have thought rent-seekers vs economic and societal contributors.
|timestamp=4:56 AM · Feb 11, 2018
}}
|timestamp=5:05 AM · Feb 11, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/987847446779707392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@BatDaddyOfThree I tried for every. Dare to dream.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/987770832129699843
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Every time I hear “Tax is theft” or “Scientists are welfare queens in lab coats” or “Science would be better left to the free market” or “Why should my taxpayer dollars be used for research?” I’m reminded that US Republicans don’t want to be the party of sound economic theory.
|timestamp=7:11 PM · Apr 21, 2018
}}
|timestamp=12:15 AM · Apr 22, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/987898548673916928
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Stevenwoolery Not my position. But thanks. I think elites are very dangerous. However there are technical things that must be managed by technical people. Markets and ballots should be used over elites where possible. But not everywhere.
|timestamp=3:39 AM · Apr 22, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988105060784590849
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@RoJoe2012 @AppFlyer Just give him time.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988079933451788289
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Those who like the idea of arming teachers don’t think a lot about the minority of angry unstable overstressed people who also happen to be teachers. 

My Prediction: Arming poorly-paid over stressed undervetted teachers will create an entirely different class of school shooting.
|timestamp=3:39 PM · Apr 22, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988081574833897472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@jerrylieb12 I was a teacher. I also documented government tampering with the free market in my sector. Not going to rehash here today. Another time...
|timestamp=3:46 PM · Apr 22, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988083000070946817
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@DizzyJude Not stolen but much appreciated. No claim of originality here.

[I should point out I have not read every article nor watched every video on the internet. Yet.]
|timestamp=3:51 PM · Apr 22, 2018
}}
|timestamp=5:19 PM · Apr 22, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988585330495209472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AlexBerezow Likely an astute call; it sounds mostly correct. I would bet you are also younger. I’m further convinced the recent strengthening of the anti-science movement on the political Left may weirdly be influencing a shift on the political right.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988540241655939077
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Thanks for asking Alex. “Welfare Queens in White Lab Coats” is an oft repeated epithet since the Reagan-Bush era in anti-tax circles. Certainly Prof Rustum Roy said it. RR’s NSF Director boosted it. But I‘m referring to its amplification by free marketeers who ignore mkt failure. https://t.co/rj4YDMmpTg
|timestamp=10:08 PM · Apr 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988542890778312704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=As for boosts in Scientific funding, I’m not saying all US Republicans are anti-science funding. On the contrary. Many see it as an extension of security funding or competitiveness. But what drives many scientists away is an unwillingness to be careful about public goods &amp; taxes.
|timestamp=10:19 PM · Apr 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988544789661470721
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AlexBerezow Well, given that you hadn’t yet heard the expression before I’m thinking you may want to look at the history before retooling the implicit accusation that this was nothing. Erich Bloch wasn’t a nut. Nor was Roy.

[You can steelman your argument by pointing out Proxmire as a Dem.]
|timestamp=10:26 PM · Apr 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988552573685710848
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AlexBerezow I’m sorry! I’m only aware of your book on the anti-scientific left (which is a huge problem as well), but not any work on the “anti-scientific” right. What do you write about Erich Bloch? I’m curious because I also covered him in my work. Can’t wait to discuss.
|timestamp=10:57 PM · Apr 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/988573646682636288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@joeseybert I may be wrong too! Happy to learn.
|timestamp=12:21 AM · Apr 24, 2018
}}
|timestamp=1:08 AM · Apr 24, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992048961564196864
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=There was a mysterious structural blow to markets around ‘70. Our problems largely stem from the Boomer response which was to hide the wound untreated for decades to live out life in a style above that to which their parents had become accustomed.

And the end of that is our now.
|timestamp=2:31 PM · May 03, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992954707185319937
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Pathfinder4545 No I’m not. I’m intuiting from my experiences that there is some wrong with the tail analysis. I have a guess what it is as well but don’t want to wade in until I have the time to see if it bears some preliminary scrutiny.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992495993894547456
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=A lot of folks are curious about where I stand on @RealCandaceO. Here are things I’m watching for: 
a) as someone w/ strong support for Israel, I’m hoping Candace will talk about the need to decouple issues of police brutality against US blacks from any anti-Israel stance of BLM.
|timestamp=8:07 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992497198091845632
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=b) I’m looking to see whether she‘s going to take on the Race &amp; IQ discussion from the point of recognizing the myriad examples of Black genius we drown in as Americans, which would be unlikely under the simple bell curve argument. Not my issue, but one that upsets me greatly.
|timestamp=8:12 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992498497612955648
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=c) I’m looking to see if she builds kindness &amp; empathy toward those she opposes. Here she’s reached out to me as a Bernie voter with generousity of spirit. But I’d love to see more of such heart &amp; compassion.

These are all things I’ve said to her directly. So I’ll watch &amp; wait.
|timestamp=8:17 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992502288219439104
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=But what I’m sure of is that Candace is 100% her own person who will become whoever she want to become &amp; has the talent to make a huge impact. So I’d like to be helpful (if that it is going to be positive as I see the world) from across the aisle. A loyal opposition is important.
|timestamp=8:32 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992529647702130688
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@n_bresnahan @RealCandaceO Police brutality can be a BIG problem but it varies by location. How big a problem and how anti-black it is, is a matter of data and experience. I think she thinks it’s exaggerated relative to the data in aggregate. I hear that from some academics but don’t know myself.
|timestamp=10:21 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992531745235845120
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@DoughTheory @RealCandaceO Really?? You aren’t getting it. The anti-Israel issue is a divisive intersectional wedge issue keeping blacks &amp; Jews from coming together. It is SUPER important because it creates a catastrophic illusion that US Jews won’t fight for Black justice. Which is just tactical bullshit.
|timestamp=10:29 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992533082220650496
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AlexanderBlum0 @RealCandaceO It’s an order of operations issue. Fighting needless wedge issues brings coalitions on line which allow leverage. We want to come together. I’m talking about clearing away needless obstacles first.
|timestamp=10:35 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992537153992245248
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@jeffgiesea @RealCandaceO I would never do that. Have you met her?? Ha! I don’t think anyone can goad her. She’s one of the most forceful self defined people I’ve ever met. Given that I’m not a conservative, I’m talking about my issues for people who want to know why I’m taking an interest.
|timestamp=10:51 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992541412255088640
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AlexanderBlum0 @RealCandaceO Optics I can’t speak to. Anti-Black racism is obviously real. I’d be *shocked* if @RealCandaceO said it wasn’t in a calm moment. She does make claims that it’s exaggerated for political gain though. But I’m not getting in there when there are black voices I’d rather listen to.
|timestamp=11:08 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992541541267746816
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@nathano_j @AlexanderBlum0 @RealCandaceO And selective prosecution.
|timestamp=11:08 PM · May 04, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992563690661539841
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@KenfukintuckyKJ Not a fan of Bernie’s views of Markets.
|timestamp=12:36 AM · May 05, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/992564332490706945
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@YankeleZ Are you unaware of the other choices?? It wasn’t really a “design your own pizza” kind of election.
|timestamp=12:39 AM · May 05, 2018
}}
|timestamp=2:30 AM · May 06, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/993719975729807360
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@TheRealAltLeft @OldmanOfTheWeb @_HelenDale @SexyIsntSexist @HPluckrose @GSpellchecker I particularly dislike the “libtard” “commie” and “baby murderer” epithets, or beliefs that markets are without market failure. So I’m not fooling myself. But the right is getting more civil as the Left gets less liberal because the liberal civil left is homeless for a bit.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/993555036356526083
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@OldmanOfTheWeb @_HelenDale @SexyIsntSexist @HPluckrose @GSpellchecker I do tend to hang out with people who talk about ideas and aren’t fixated on the melanin content of my skin, my Y-Chromosome, or my lucky country of birth. How that became “the Right” is beyond me. I missed the mother of all memos it would seem.
|timestamp=6:15 PM · May 07, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/993557471250694144
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@_HelenDale @OldmanOfTheWeb @SexyIsntSexist @HPluckrose @GSpellchecker Do you have a theory? It seems like some reprogramming happened at scale that no one can put his or her finger on.
|timestamp=6:25 PM · May 07, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/993560087242293248
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@_HelenDale @HPluckrose @TheAlchemist235 @OldmanOfTheWeb @SexyIsntSexist @GSpellchecker Cool! Id love to learn. I’ve been working up a few too having to do with emotional intelligence, social and emotional learning, social media + mobile and decreased friction in the return of costs, post Lehman bros household formation issues, etc..
|timestamp=6:35 PM · May 07, 2018
}}
|timestamp=5:11 AM · May 08, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/995113182287970304
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner @bariweiss [please continue to hold.....]
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/994990051783204864
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner "all these thinkers can do is appease their followers. They are thought leaders who cannot demonstrate any leadership." -@dandrezner

Nice to meet you Dan. But that "take" comes from where exactly? Research? Personal interaction? You left me confused because it didn't make sense.
|timestamp=5:18 PM · May 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/995012008264187904
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner @bariweiss Splendid. But that "Take" isn't what the IDW is about. I mean do you take issue w/ my work on labor markets? Mortgage backed securities? CPI and GDP? Bret's take on drug testing on specially bred mice? Heather on risk in Education? Ben's conservative objection to Breitbart/Trump?
|timestamp=6:45 PM · May 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/995013133482643456
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner @bariweiss Are you objecting to Sam Harris' desire to put transcendence into Athiesm via meditation or even psychedlics? Jordan's emphasis on needing to offer unapologetically family/work-oriented male models to outcompete the lure of hate? 

It just seems you found a take without a basis.
|timestamp=6:49 PM · May 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/995013677974667264
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner @bariweiss May I ask you to look again or too explain why all the interesting things we talk about are of no interest? You might want to look at my essays on Russell Conjugation, Excellence, The crisis in Physics, Four Quadrant model, Kayfabe, Anthropic Capitalism, Coasian immigration, etc.
|timestamp=6:52 PM · May 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/995014557578903552
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner @bariweiss And that's just my stuff. Every one of us has such a catalog. How are you saying none of this is of any interest. You can see that from our engagement on even on technical geeky topics. This isn't about SJWs gone mad. 

I think you may have jumped the gun. Do reconsider.
|timestamp=6:55 PM · May 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/995089909697298432
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@dandrezner @bariweiss How did it go? Honestly I would have thought this research would happen before forming such a strong conclusion.
|timestamp=11:54 PM · May 11, 2018
}}
|timestamp=1:27 AM · May 12, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999699194431422469
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@quinnessential @JeffWilson4570 @holidayinnexpre God this is so hard. All of us are bored by these takedown pieces intellectually. The gotchas. The Cathy Newman style interviews. It’s not marketing strategy.

We listen to the MSM often for the reasons that hostages pay attention to their AK-47 wielding captors’ idiot politics.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999104330627039233
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Okay. So, I'm not an evolutionary biologist with expertise in mating systems. But I do have an internet connection, a deep love of nature, and once stayed in a @holidayinnexpre ss.

A paper on "Enforced Monogamy" from the "Journal of Evolutionary Biology":
https://t.co/xS5pJ7hQIN https://t.co/pDw60uCxc2
|timestamp=1:46 AM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999106875445530624
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Want more? This is funny. 

So, not only is "Enforced Monogamy" a reserved academic term in a few different areas, the @nytimes own search engine shows at least 2 separate positive references to the term as a positive progressive ideal in 2000 &amp; '02 before @jordanbpeterson's use.
|timestamp=1:56 AM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999108821510340608
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Here the @nytimes publishes a review pointing out "enforced monogamy" should be a positive progressive *feminist* ideal in humans, likely to "[reduce] sexual conflict", increase paternal investment in child rearing obligations &amp; giving healthier offspring. https://t.co/OTdlFV0Mjp https://t.co/wQhtjure32
|media=ERW-X-post-999108821510340608-Dd2K7F2VMAEH4v_.jpg
|timestamp=2:04 AM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999113173574680576
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=In the other @nytimes reference I find before the @jordanbpeterson hit piece, the NYT is talking about *progressive reforms* in 1928 Afghanistan where "Enforced Monogamy" is discussed alongside "Separation of Church &amp; State" and...wait for it..."Emancipation of Women".

Wild, no? https://t.co/KaTuYPSon3
|media=ERW-X-post-999113173574680576-Dd2PObfUQAIKVXv.jpg
|timestamp=2:21 AM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999294777903366144
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@clairlemon @DavidDeutschOxf @nytimes I’m fairly sure David recognizes my original argument (a NYT  review seeing enforced monogamy as a feminist utopia) and is starting a new line of thought rather than his thinking I’m promoting experimentally enforced monogamy trials in humans based on a drosophila model. A hunch.
|timestamp=2:23 PM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999342208527421440
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@l0g1c9uY @nytimes @jordanbpeterson Shhh. Not so loud, or everyone will find out.
|timestamp=5:32 PM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999660795746181120
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Kev_in_Canada @nytimes More to the point things like cryptic female choice in fruit flies, or concealed ovulation in humans make a big difference as systems, to say nothing of relative k vs r-selection. But the assertion of relevance to humans wasn’t mine. It was in the review.
|timestamp=2:38 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
|timestamp=5:10 PM · May 24, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999300191919394817
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@cjane87 @tomeclarke @Vox_The_Weeds @DLind @mattyglesias @ezraklein @tylercowen @voxdotcom DM received. And returned.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999127281309118464
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@tomeclarke @Vox_The_Weeds @DLind @mattyglesias @cjane87 I heard that one too with @ezraklein struggling to understand that this might be a major problem. So bizarre.
|timestamp=3:18 AM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999142877723672576
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@tomeclarke @Vox_The_Weeds @DLind @mattyglesias @cjane87 @ezraklein Well, @tylercowen is always incisive with his analysis. But the weird point is that the @voxdotcom folks don't seem to intuit that the people who are most livid are thinking liberals who are pro-market, pro-achievement and anti-stupid. Shut down culture is pro-Trump in 2020.
|timestamp=4:19 AM · May 23, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999297033918758912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@cjane87 @tomeclarke @Vox_The_Weeds @DLind @mattyglesias @ezraklein @tylercowen @voxdotcom Hi Jane. I listened to Vox’s “the weeds” discussion with you of the so-called IDW which I appear to have named. Where can I even begin. You guys were fine-tuning a highly interpreted shared model of the world that seemed insular &amp; smug to the point of being willfully delusional.
|timestamp=2:32 PM · May 23, 2018
}}
|timestamp=2:45 PM · May 23, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999704903869087744
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@redstatetake @egohorrified @AdotSad @RealCandaceO I’d be happy to hear that. But to keep pushing relentlessly as if there is no chasm between me and Candace? I mean, really?? 

And...uh...“gaslighting”?? Asking me to repeatedly denounce someone’s aggressive tactics after I’ve been clear? Doesn’t follow me? Something is off here.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999673384618217472
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AdotSad @redstatetake @RealCandaceO Really? Fascinating. You *know* this is her *only* thing? So go on. Tell me. 

You see, @RealCandaceO reached out to me despite a vast political chasm between us. Yet you are some kind of special mind with the confidence to contradict my direct personal experience. Do say more!
|timestamp=3:28 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999681898019340288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AdotSad @redstatetake @RealCandaceO Sorry. What? Huh?? Are you mad?

Candace is a conservative. I believe she is a Trump supporter. She's anti-abortion rights. She's probably very pro-gun rights. She likes red meat tactics.

I don't know who you are, but this is increasingly seeming to be a delusional conversation.
|timestamp=4:01 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999694115519414272
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AdotSad @redstatetake @RealCandaceO And I already answered that. Straightforwardly. I don’t like those public tactics. Your weird inability to hear is getting creepy. Going to have to bail out soon. You aren’t getting it.
|timestamp=4:50 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999695608540643328
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AdotSad @redstatetake @RealCandaceO People? Who people? The MSM &amp; “progressive” Commentariats?? Don’t make me laugh. They’re a guild losing market share &amp; we compete with them. And I’m generally not fighting Trump you confused soul. I’m fighting any doubling down on the crazy failed HRC strategy that elected Trump.
|timestamp=4:56 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999699559226880000
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@AdotSad @redstatetake @RealCandaceO Gaslight???

I’m out. Be well.
|timestamp=5:12 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/999700801663614977
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@scottie1479 @AdotSad @redstatetake @RealCandaceO I voted for her. I was upset that she beat Bernie and lost to Trump. But I think she was atrocious as a candidate for 2016. Anyone sane, competent, honest and truly compassionate could have won as a Democrat over Trump.
|timestamp=5:16 PM · May 24, 2018
}}
|timestamp=5:33 PM · May 24, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1001362610653085696
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@bkr114895 @Noahpinion Who deleted what tweet?? I didn’t see it.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1001341271296827392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I don’t mind @Noahpinion making this wrong argument as a neo-liberal political activist. Just not as an economist, an expert, or an academician. 

Because he‘s certainly aware that this hasn’t been a free lunch. It’s designed as cryptic wealth transfer:

https://t.co/VjYwcTSveH https://t.co/TY8OtyJyKO
|timestamp=5:55 AM · May 29, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1001343017322610688
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Noahpinion You are actually playing stupid? That’s mind blowing. You should be well aware that the NAS who you cited is the CENTER of the market manipulation. That is, you are citing the bad actor as impartial judge! Who do you think is behind the collusion Noah?? 

It’s NAS. Read my paper.
|timestamp=6:02 AM · May 29, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1001347199257661440
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Noahpinion Woah. Am I supposed to be afraid of the @theNASciences??  And social scientists? I quake in my boots. 

Sit down my son. The NAS has invited me on at least four occasions to explain this ‘conspiracy’ to them. They have thanked me for it, paid my expenses, &amp; never challenged it.
|timestamp=6:19 AM · May 29, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1001349815370891265
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Noahpinion No one is buying? Other than the NAS itself who bought it when they invited me and gave me a standing Ovation. Then invited me to their COSEPUP committee and reacted in horror. Then invited me back to address their GUIRR committee. Etc...

So the NAS bought it. But do keep going.
|timestamp=6:29 AM · May 29, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1001350589689643008
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Noahpinion Not following you into another meaningless briar patch. You can contend with my paper. I’ll wait.
|timestamp=6:32 AM · May 29, 2018
}}
|timestamp=7:20 AM · May 29, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002616764839018496
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@SamHarrisOrg @primalpoly @nytimes Okay! So my guess is that you &amp; I are within range on theory. Perhaps I believe the emotional, cryptic and narrative framings are the center of the story, while you may view the reported facts as the center?

I fear news is now a loss leader &amp; emotional manipulation, the payload.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002568335731482625
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I disagree w @SamHarrisOrg here &amp; am far more troubled by @nytimes than he. I think what he thinks makes it pretty good is exactly what makes it terrifying to me. I agree it often fact checks. It’s well written. It often includes reporting. But news-narratives are a deal breaker. https://t.co/8pfyUhD6zM
|timestamp=3:11 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002572168201289728
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=This is a disagreement worthy of the IDW. It is worth exploring civily. 

Defending @jordanbpeterson against NYT insinuations that he is an MRA who wants women to be redistributed to celibate losers under enforced monogamy intervention programs?? It just wasted everyone’s time.
|timestamp=3:26 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002582178868260865
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Bugs_Meany @NicoDelon @jordanbpeterson [Watching this thread with some interest]
|timestamp=4:06 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002583448471494656
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@heinousjay @NicoDelon @Bugs_Meany @jordanbpeterson Fascinating.
|timestamp=4:11 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002586233887850496
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@primalpoly @SamHarrisOrg @nytimes Exactly, no? I’m fascinated by why this point is so difficult to make. It’s the “uncanny valley of journalism” where things get hyper disturbing the closer the form gets to objectivity, while the narrative remains the true, if hidden, driver.
|timestamp=4:22 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002600826530029569
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@RubinReport @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg I’d do it if we could broaden this to include multiple points of difference. I also would be willing to discuss my extreme discomfort w/ this administration with you and why you and I disagree about it it. I’d also love to talk to @benshapiro on abortion and market failure. Etc..
|timestamp=5:20 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002602666646593537
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@SamHarrisOrg @primalpoly @nytimes Okay. From my side I want to agree w/ you that fact checking at NYT is still pretty good. Where I’m going is omission checking, Russell Conjugated emotional instructions, narrative driven reporting, character assassination, etc. 

Fact checking makes this worse to me. Not better.
|timestamp=5:27 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002603990427684865
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@SamHarrisOrg @primalpoly @nytimes In other words I’m not as worried about the facts. I can often pick facts out of the soup of political cheerleading. If NYT were perfect on all the facts they reported it wouldn’t solve the problem. Might it not, arguably, make the omissions/narrative/assassination problem worse?
|timestamp=5:33 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1002605563774042112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@SamHarrisOrg @primalpoly @nytimes But, @SamHarrisOrg. Is the problem here that your definitions of misinformation actually includes *all* known journalistic distortion tricks (e.g. Russell Conjugation, buried ledes, “to be sure” graphs, etc.). That would shift my sense away from facts as the center of your issue.
|timestamp=5:39 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}
|timestamp=6:23 PM · Jun 01, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1064619431823691776
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@SvilenK @PangburnInspire That’s pretty cool!
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1064042979281690625
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I’m thinking of making IDW a brand just to keep others from exploiting it. I got patched in to the NY popup conference that formed from the meltdown of @PangburnInspire &amp; it was infuriating. So much love from people traveling from Iceland, Chile, Sweden, etc. I *love* our people!
|timestamp=6:29 AM · Nov 18, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1064046772190830592
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=It’s not about IDW as a name. I can generate a new one. It’s about people losing their heads over $. Our audience is eager to pay good money for courage &amp; intellect and as such that MUST be respected. As of now, I’m taking on other’s responsibilities that are in no way even mine.
|timestamp=6:44 AM · Nov 18, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1064048956118716416
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@kketils @PangburnInspire So flattered that you guys care so much. Will use any remaining leverage to get answers and money back from @PangburnInspire to y’all however remote the possibility. But then he owes us too of course! Called over tonight. No answer.

You guys rock. Love ya 🇮🇸!!
|timestamp=6:53 AM · Nov 18, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1064051254563790848
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@Purplep0pe @PangburnInspire Gosh, I‘m having to rethink everything. I met the organizer once &amp; did just one event with him. I like business &amp; markets but hate seeing good people (speakers &amp; ticket buyers) being stiffed and ghosted. Such great new people stepping up to the plate to fill the void too. Argh..
|timestamp=7:02 AM · Nov 18, 2018
}}
|timestamp=8:40 PM · Nov 19, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1070419106313134080
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@alejandrina_gr You may be coaxing them out of the vacuum...if you are serious and there is sufficient demand. I’d have no objection to making a small business and a little profit around changing the world and bringing our folks together. Who doesn’t love markets and human decency? I’d buy one..
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1070417579083161600
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@alejandrina_gr Would you want Merch? Serious question.
|timestamp=8:40 PM · Dec 05, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1070417792673828864
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@alejandrina_gr Also: nice to ‘meet’ you Alejandrina.
|timestamp=8:41 PM · Dec 05, 2018
}}
|timestamp=8:46 PM · Dec 05, 2018
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1072629413127356417
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=2/4 Mr Pichai:

Q1) Do you *unbias* search you think is biased under an internal “ML-Fairness” initiative?

Q2) Did Google find that History can represent “latency bias”? Findings in biology/psychology can lead to exclusion bias? Economic theory can lead to inequality bias? Etc.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1072629410350665732
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=1/4 Google literally tells you how they bias your view of the world. Only they call it unbiasing. And unbiasing is supposedly politically neutral. It’s just that in the view of woke engineers, conservatives are typically biased by history, privilege, biological essetnialism, etc.
|timestamp=11:09 PM · Dec 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1072629415941730310
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=4/4 I hope someone took a shot at this line of questioning. But I’m writing this as a non conservative because this “no bias” game is moronic. We don’t need ‘fresh faces’. We need tough folks in congress w/ technical backgrounds who can operate in all areas where Google operates.
|timestamp=11:09 PM · Dec 11, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1072629414645633024
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=3/4

Q3) If you found conservatives were likely to believe in more traditional interpretations of Gender, Biology, Markets, Military Power, Ethnicity, Religion, Borders, Psychology, Wealth, Achievement, would they be more likely to be *unbiased* by Google?

That’s how this works.
|timestamp=11:09 PM · Dec 11, 2018
}}
|timestamp=11:09 PM · Dec 11, 2018
}}