Editing Standard Model (section)

=== 2019 ===

{{Tweet
|image=KevinThorup-profile-tdJefo8Y.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup/status/1084872396308328449
|name=Kevin Thorup
|usernameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup
|username=KevinThorup
|content=Thanks! I was trying to harmonize, in my mind, how (1) you described gauge theories on the JRE with (2) the formalizations above and was having a shockingly difficult time
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=logicians-profile-hA9Ttab1.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/logicians/status/1084535971830550529
|name=Philosophical Logic
|usernameurl=https://x.com/logicians
|username=logicians
|content=Lol easy
|media1=logicians-X-post-1084535971830550529-Dw0Lt0zUYAA4uSj.jpg
|timestamp=7:41 PM · Jan 13, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=KevinThorup-profile-tdJefo8Y.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup/status/1084824698804789248
|name=Kevin Thorup
|usernameurl=https://x.com/KevinThorup
|username=KevinThorup
|content=Fascinating. I’m curious what @EricRWeinstein‘s reaction would be to this
|timestamp=2:48 PM · Jan 14, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1084871544617164801
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Inneficiant presentation of the [[Standard Model]] Lagrangian.
|timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 14, 2019
}}
|timestamp=5:58 PM · Jan 14, 2019
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1091743276565069826
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=This is why we need to rescue our experts &amp; institutions. We need to stop asking them to lie to us about their needs for growth. If even high energy physics can’t escape its inability to meet growth expectations, then all expert communities are suspect.

These are our very best.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1091743271875895297
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I’ve been talking about unmeetable  [[Embedded Growth Obligations|“Embedded Growth Obligations” or E.G.O.s]] as the reason why all our expert communities are under unbearable pressure to distort across our institutions. The physics community is *very* trustworthy on the experiment-theory level. Yet even here:
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=skdh-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/skdh/status/1091582806021623808
|name=Sabine Hossenfelder
|usernameurl=https://x.com/skdh
|username=skdh
|content=Particle physicists surprised to find I am not their cheer-leader

https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/02/particle-physicists-surprised-to-find-i.html?spref=tw
|media1=skdh-X-post-1091582806021623808-DyYUwdaWwAEHRbx.jpg
|timestamp=6:23 AM · Feb 1, 2019
}}
|timestamp=5:00 PM · Feb 2, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1091743274526683136
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=This allows us to use Fundamental Physics as a reference for deception.

These folks are our BEST. They aren’t lying about their experiments. They aren’t lying about agreement w theory. They aren’t wrong about expecting another accelerator imho.

Yet the [[Embedded Growth Obligations|EGOs]] make even them fib.
|timestamp=5:00 PM · Feb 2, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1091743275533266944
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I may disagree with @skdh on whether we should build another multi-billion dollar accelerator. But she is exactly correct that there is no longer any new physics beyond the [[Standard Model]] expected to be found. She is telling truths above her pay-grade in the eyes of our leaders.
|timestamp=5:00 PM · Feb 2, 2019
}}
|timestamp=5:00 PM · Feb 2, 2019
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1170821379786100736
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=There was an underlying political economy to the issue masked by “shut up &amp; calculate”. I agree that the quantum field theorists were often, and words fail me, dicks about quantum foundations. But it was really an overlay on a rational calculation of expected return from 1928-74.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1170821377537925121
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Ok. This is a weird take. The reluctance to engage foundations of quantum mechanics stemmed from the fact that it was far less generative than research in quantum field thy for decades. When [[Standard Model]] [[Quantum Field Theory|QFT]] stagnated &amp; [[Quantum Gravity]] stumbled, the opportunity cost decreased.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Seanmcarroll-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/seanmcarroll/status/1170355961673863168
|name=Sean Carroll
|usernameurl=https://x.com/seanmcarroll
|username=seanmcarroll
|content=Shots fired! "Even Physicists Don’t Understand Quantum Mechanics. Worse, they don’t seem to want to understand it." -- me, in the New York Times @nytopinion #SomethingDeeply

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/opinion/sunday/quantum-physics.html
|media1=seanmcarroll-X-post-1170355961673863168.jpg
|timestamp=3:19 PM · Sep 8, 2019
}}
|timestamp=10:09 PM · Sep 8, 2019
}}
|timestamp=10:09 PM · Sep 8, 2019
}}