Editing Lefty Enervation Packet (section)

== On X ==

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1828471409036927263
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But….i mean….c’mon. This is self-evident historically. 

It’s time to face facts.

https://documentcloud.org/documents/5000042-390521673-the-Good-Censor-GOOGLE-LEAK
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1828467697312731195
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=There is an old suite of ideas from a different time:

What appears to be coordinated is actually emergent.

What appears to be malice is actually incompetence.

What appears to be a pattern is generally random.

What appears to be doable outside of markets isn’t worth attempting because it can’t be coordinated and/or it is against human nature and/or has too many unintended consequences.</br>
——

When enough people were educated to believe that suite as a sign of membership in the sophisticated elite, it then became possible to weaponize those ideas because they all shared a hidden feature: enervation.

People too sophisticated to believe in conspiracies, blame, patterns or the possibility of change will not only tend to do nothing, but they will tend to ensure that nothing can be coordinated around them except by narrow self interest. Which means markets/commerce/business is the only thing left.

In this clip, “Is Google trying to influence the 2024 election.” Chris is struggling to point out that it doesn’t require a conspiracy. Of course that is true.

But it is much more helpful to notice that if you have a portfolio of explanations and with allocations to emergence vs coordination, it would be insane to have a zero allocation to conspiracy. 

Moral: Learn how to be a responsible conspiracy theorist. There are no lizard people. But there are sure a lot of back channels and algorithms you know nothing about. 

NOTE: Zuckerberg’s letter pointing to such a coordination in an earlier election appeared after this was taped. So…

{{#widget:YouTube|id=bWEGi0cF23k}}

|timestamp=9:20 AM · Aug 27, 2024
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1828471405815701970
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I disagree with Chris here.

Some of this is emergent. But you cannot explain what it going on by emergence alone.

Google is trying to influence everything.

How? I don’t know. I don’t work there.
|timestamp=4:35 PM · Aug 27, 2024
}}
|timestamp=4:35 PM · Aug 27, 2024
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1196260199926906882
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It‘s time to leave the traditional media &amp; party regulars behind. We must simply hold the debates and analysis far away from residents of The Beltway, Brooklyn, Mountain View and Cambridge where the sore thumb on the scales can no longer be ignored. Alex Jones my ass. As it were.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1196260191181787136
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So this time you‘re going to pee on our leg, tell us it’s raining &amp; call us Alex Joneses wearing tin foil hats when we point out the obvious: you are trying to bury Andrew Yang who is gaining?

&amp;%*# these people. This is clearly a policy not an error. Of very large N now.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=VelshiMSNBC-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/VelshiMSNBC/status/1196177898178334722
|name="Velshi" on MSNBC
|usernameurl=https://x.com/VelshiMSNBC
|username=VelshiMSNBC
|content=Earlier on UP, we aired a poll graphic that inadvertently left off @AndrewYang. This was a mistake that we've since corrected on air.  We apologize to Mr. Yang.  Here's the correct graphic:
|media1=VelshiMSNBC-X-post-1196177898178334722-EJmtdJCXkAERBrd.jpg
|timestamp=8:26 PM · Nov 17, 2019
}}
|timestamp=2:53 AM · Nov 18, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1196260195581587460
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=“Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”
-Hanlon’s Razor

“Never stupidly apply Hanlon’s razor to a series with large N where perhaps an N of at most 3 could plausibly be explained without malice, giggling & winking.”
-Weinstein’s Correction
|timestamp=6:53 PM · Nov 17, 2019
}}
|timestamp=2:53 AM · Nov 18, 2019
}}