Editing Erwin Chargaff (section)

=== 2009 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2187484736
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content="[The] likelihood of two geniuses getting together before my eyes here at Cavendish seemed so small that I did not even consider it." -[[Erwin Chargaff|E.C.]]
|timestamp=3:21 AM · Jun 16, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2187637991
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The earlier quote of [[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff]] on [[Jim Watson|Watson]]-[[Francis Crick|Crick]] is not yet on a regular web page? May I back out that it is of minor importance?
|timestamp=3:34 AM · Jun 16, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704496800
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Imagine before [[Jim Watson|Watson]]-[[Francis Crick|Crick]] I asked you: "Go nuts. What could possibly make [[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff's]] Equimolar rules gorgeous, motivated and canonical?"
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3703002903
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ever heard an organized religion complain that G-d would never slap some butt ugly quartic potential on the world to give it mass?
|timestamp=2:33 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704214643
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=To Dave Bacon: "Butt ugly" referred to the present motivation for the Higgs terms as intellectual spackle. Soft mass won't likely stay ugly
|timestamp=3:39 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704373990
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Higgs mass is akin to the once poorly motivated "neutral currents" rejected by Feynman as merely invoked for renormalizabilty. Now: not so.
|timestamp=3:49 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704435018
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Challenge to my physics followers: what could possibly make the Mexican Hat quartic gorgeous, natural and canonical? #daretodream
|timestamp=3:53 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
|timestamp=3:56 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5235554811
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff's]] "Heraclitean Fire: Sketches from a Life Before Nature": The greatest scientific autobiography you will never read.
|timestamp=5:25 PM · Oct 28, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5427488290
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Before the double helix, [[Erwin Chargaff]] put forward that the structure of DNA should be.......anyone?......a mobius band(?!).
|timestamp=7:01 PM · Nov 4, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6655546222
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content="It has been found experimentally...." begins the sentence in theorists Watson & Crick's note sticking it to Chargaff. Why let that through?
|timestamp=7:34 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}