View source for Anti-Interesting

[[File:Jeff-Epstein-Bill-Clinton.jpg|thumb]]

The concept of '''"Anti-Interesting,"''' originated by Eric Weinstein, describes phenomena, events, or topics that are inherently fascinating, newsworthy, and potentially of great public interest but are deliberately underreported, ignored, or downplayed by mainstream media and other institutional actors. The essence of the concept lies in the idea that these topics are not simply "uninteresting" but are actively suppressed because they threaten established narratives, powerful institutions, or vested interests.


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179687340572672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content='''Anti-interesting''', adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}


Weinstein argues that '''"anti-interesting"''' subjects often involve significant discrepancies or "failures to close" within the visible world, where the observable facts or events do not align with the narratives presented by media and authorities. These discrepancies suggest the existence of an "invisible world"—forces or agendas working behind the scenes to control what is reported or discussed publicly.

Examples Eric has cited as '''"anti-interesting"''' include the lack of media interest in Jeffrey Epstein's wealth origins, "hedge fund" currency trading records and filings, and ties to intelligence, the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic's origins and the role of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak, [[President Joe Bidens Cognitive Decline|President Joe Biden's Cognitive Decline]], and various other significant issues that, despite their potential to captivate the public, are sidelined in public discourse.

In essence, '''"anti-interesting"''' highlights the disconnect between what should naturally draw public attention and what is actually allowed to surface in mainstream narratives, pointing to an underlying mechanism of control that dictates the boundaries of acceptable discourse.


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1462468183663595522
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Something is anti-interesting when it is newsworthy in the extreme and fascinating to consumers of news but the editors show a preternatural disinterest in covering it. “The world has moved on.” “Nobody knows who these people are.” “There’s not enough here.” “Tin Foil Hat story.”
|timestamp=5:09 PM · Nov 21, 2021
}}

==On YouTube==

{{#widget:YouTube|id=HDLuSjc-f6Q}}

== More On X==

=== 2020 ===


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220181087650906112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you want to see this theory of Idea Suppression in action, retweet the first tweet in the thread with hashtag #SlipTheDISC. Hey, who knows...We might be able to change the game.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179670802395137
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news &amp; professors. They are not disinterested, but '''anti-interested'''. Except for Greg.
{{Tweet
|image=greggutfeld-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/greggutfeld/status/1220169528761552897
|name=GregGutfeld
|usernameurl=https://x.com/greggutfeld
|username=greggutfeld
|content=if you haven't listened to this then you're in for a crazy, unhinged but brilliant ride.
|timestamp=1:20 AM · Jan 22, 2020
}}
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179678842933248
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is '''anti-interesting'''? Well Jeffery Epstein’s wealth source is '''anti-interesting''' to media. Bernie in 2016 was '''anti-interesting''' to @nytimes. Income inequality was '''anti-interesting''' to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was '''anti-interesting'''. Building Seven too.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179678842933248-EO7y8xoUUAAphUb.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179684547149826
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically '''anti-interesting'''. Flight 800 is pretty '''anti-interesting''' as was the Boskin Commission’s attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the CPI. The H1-B visa history is '''anti-interesting'''. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179684547149826-EO7y9I5VAAAcl0i.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179687340572672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content='''Anti-interesting''', adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179688171040768
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But I find these things fascinating. As do we all. Do stay tuned to The Portal. 

More to come. Thanks @greggutfeld!

https://sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72103/s72103-9.pdf
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
|timestamp=3:06 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233422752352100354
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421386590220288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Where are we on State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots?

Let’s try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasn’t behind Epstein if we can’t ask the question of Epstein’s ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole.
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421390029606912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is that '''anti-interesting'''? Wouldn’t we want to be sure that Epstein’s fortune didn’t come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didn’t and aren’t reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us.
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421391669497856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Pursue this even further: if news desks aren’t asking these questions, aren’t they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they aren’t willing to *ask* Qs?
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233422750229745666
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase “No Comment” is familiar to anyone my age from this time.

Where is that phrase?
|timestamp=4:04 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
|timestamp=4:04 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1257067241914298369
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ghislaine Maxwell is the most '''anti-interesting''' person on earth. She remained not worth locating, questioning or investigating during all of April.
|timestamp=9:59 PM · May 3, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1257067241914298369-EXH__kHU0AUEEBC.jpg
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1274770155185176576
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is Ghislaine Maxwell so '''anti-interesting''' to our media? To our FBI? To our CIA? I mean these folks do *not* want to find her or talk to her in a HUGE way. 

Let’s find out.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Margoandhow-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Margoandhow/status/1274519130012614656
|name=Margo Howard
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Margoandhow
|username=Margoandhow
|content=How hard can this be - unless the US (read Trump & Friends) has asked Interpol NOT to find her?

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1014441/jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-hiding-paris-flat/
|timestamp=1:46 AM · Jun 21, 2020
}}
|timestamp=6:24 PM · Jun 21, 2020
}}

=== 2021 ===
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1462468183663595522}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1465200664326275072}}

=== 2022 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1487487234273996802
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Are Enormous Canadian Trucker Protests '''Anti-Interesting'''? If so, why?
|timestamp=6:06 PM · Jan 29, 2022
|media1=ERW-X-post-1487487234273996802-CXYvAcDHdFilGB1k.png
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1536209509818851329
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=“Anti-Interesting” is an important concept: not everyone has experienced it, but once you see it even a single time, you will see it repeatedly thereafter.
{{Tweet
|image=SteveGuest-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/SteveGuest/status/1536009575408799744
|name=Steve Guest
|usernameurl=https://x.com/SteveGuest
|username=SteveGuest
|content=How the Sunday shows covered the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh via TVEyes.

<nowiki>#</nowiki> of mentions of "Kavanaugh":</br>
ABC's This Week: 0 mentions</br>
NBC's Meet The Press: 0 mentions</br>
CBS's Face The Nation: 0 mentions</br>
CNN SOTU: 0 mentions</br>
Fox News Sunday covered
|timestamp=3:36 PM · Jun 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=4:51 AM · Jun 13, 2022
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1605628449900490754
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This story is anti-interesting in the way that Jeffrey Epstein is anti-interesting.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1605626608739528705
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=How interesting to corporate media are public airings of the details of the relationships between FBI, Twitter, the Military, elections and THE MEDIA itself?

Follow the pathological disinterest. Follow silence. Follow what is anti-interesting. Let the “Nothing Burger” guide you.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1605626608739528705-FkhU5CKUYAA8OuQ.jpg
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=lhfang-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/lhfang/status/1605292454261182464
|name=Lee Fang
|usernameurl=https://x.com/lhfang
|username=lhfang
|content=1. TWITTER FILES PART 8

*How Twitter Quietly Aided the Pentagon’s Covert Online PsyOp Campaign*

Despite promises to shut down covert state-run propaganda networks, Twitter docs show that the social media giant directly assisted the U.S. military’s influence operations.
|timestamp=7:02 PM · Dec 20, 2022
}}
|timestamp=6:09 PM · Dec 21, 2022
}}
|timestamp=6:17 PM · Dec 21, 2022
}}

=== 2023 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1616559181238272000
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=<nowiki>*</nowiki>@doddtra 

Apologies to @dtra.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1616556159787495425
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Because:

Wuhan involves a Bio-Weapons Convention workaround using @EcoHealthNYC funded by @dtra.

CCP controls a huge market.

We created scientists who all fear for their ability to feed families when we ended true academic freedom.

Science-serfdom.

It’s '''anti-interesting'''.

🙏
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Jason-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Jason/status/1612905595614658561
|name=Jason
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Jason
|username=Jason
|content=1. Most of us civilians think it's a lab leak.

2. Scientists believe the lab leak theory is worth inquiry

3. Why are we not investigating the origin of covid 19? 

Where is the outrage that we haven't gotten to the bottom of this? 

2 years of our lives & economic turmoil!
|timestamp=7:13 PM · Jan 10, 2023
}}
|timestamp=9:59 PM · Jan 20, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1616556162379571200
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But if you really want to get it look at Wikipedia entries of people who spoke out when it was maximally taboo. There is an entire sub-system of “[[Intellectual Border Collies]]” with PhDs who police any one who strays from the consensus flock to please their institutional masters.
|timestamp=9:59 PM · Jan 20, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1616556164472516608
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It’s absurd. Sure. But can you imagine Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins going after mainstream academics as “Fringe Epidemiologists”?

We are talking about institutional evil. Why it is there, I can’t say. But we need to simply take out the Fauci class from control over science.
|timestamp=9:59 PM · Jan 20, 2023
}}
|timestamp=10:11 PM · Jan 20, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1627475772700246022
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=How bad is it? Why are we on endlessly about the environment but not corporate and government responsibility on this one? As an old school democrat, this is what we used to go after. Right??

Doesn’t make sense to me yet. Anyone? Thx.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1627475762805891073
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: What is the scientific basis of the level of reporting and official response to the Ohio Vinyl Chloride moving cloud?

I don’t know whether this is a huge deal for areas far from the derailment. But it seems '''anti-interesting''' relative to its environmental harm.
|timestamp=1:10 AM · Feb 20, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1627475767750967296
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Can we speculate on: 

A) Expected mortality impact?
B) Expected morbidity impact?
C) Expected long term Soil damage?
D) Expected impact on corn/soy based processed food products?
E) Financial loss?
|timestamp=1:10 AM · Feb 20, 2023
}}
|timestamp=1:10 AM · Feb 20, 2023
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670159329583063040
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you want to understand Trump &amp; RFK,  make it very simple. Ignore the errors and issues for a moment. ALL of them. They’re the only 2 major candidates working at the scope of “Maybe almost EVERYTHING important/weird that we’re told by institutions is potentially totally wrong.”
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670141157458980864
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Because our institutions decided that they outgrew the free society they serve.
|timestamp=6:47 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670143414569144320
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is “Prebunking Malinformation”?

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mdm-incident-response-guide_508.pdf
https://archive.is/CuoJ7
|timestamp=6:56 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670144049142173696
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is a “Free Speech Zone” to a free people? [Since 1988]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
|timestamp=6:59 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670146957158019073
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is a “reputation score” and why am I still throttled?
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=xDaily-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/xDaily/status/1670114485791596545
|name=X Daily News
|usernameurl=https://x.com/xDaily
|username=xDaily
|content=NEWS: The Twitter team continue to find shadowbans buried deep in the Twitter code. 

Just last week they found a measure that stopped accounts assigned a low 'Reputation score' from trending. 

This shadowban even applied to Elon's account and prevented his tweets from trending.
|media1=xDaily-X-post-1670114485791596545.jpg
|timestamp=5:10 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
|timestamp=7:10 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670147368602460160
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is ESG and how does it work exactly?
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=aaronsibarium-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/aaronsibarium/status/1668658866337218560
|name=Aaron Sibarium
|usernameurl=https://x.com/aaronsibarium
|username=aaronsibarium
|content=NEW: From S&P Global to the London Stock Exchange, tobacco companies are crushing Tesla in the ESG ratings. How could cigarettes, which kill over 8 million a year, be deemed a more ethical investment than electric cars? 

One answer: Tobacco’s gone woke.🧵
https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/how-tobacco-companies-are-crushing-esg-ratings/
|timestamp=5:10 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
|timestamp=7:12 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670147785600143362
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is “Controlled Sponteneity”? 

Is there a more Orwellian oxymoron among oxymorons?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax2FWS4qYVw
|timestamp=7:13 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670155414162526208
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What was Project DEFUSE? Seriously.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal/
|media1=ERW-X-post-1670155414162526208.jpg
|timestamp=7:44 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1670157696765689856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is this so '''anti-interesting'''?

Just search on “Furin”, “SARS-CoV” “Spike Protein”, “Wuhan” and “DTRA” for @doddtra. Wouldn’t you **want** deep public hearings if this was all a super unfortunate coincidence? Right??

Coincidence theory puts conspiracy theory to shame.
|timestamp=7:53 PM · Jun 17, 2023
|media1=ERW-X-post-1670157696765689856-1.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-1670157696765689856-2.jpg
}}
|timestamp=7:59 PM · Jun 17, 2023
}}

=== 2024 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1857213467113165103
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In 9 days, this video about the second shooter has fewer than 4K views. I find that odd because I find Mike Benz to be pretty compelling.

Perhaps it’s not that interesting. Perhaps it’s '''anti-interesting'''. 🤷‍♀️ 

What’s your take?

[Thanks to @JakeOrthwein and @MikeBenzCyber.]
|timestamp=12:06 AM · Nov 15, 2024
}}

=== 2025 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1887273223668310500
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I really want to know. And it is a totally fair question we were all trained not to even think about...let alone ask and expect a straight answer.

I don't see President Trump wanting to protect any group who tried to make sure he never took office again.
|media1=ERW-X-post-1887271985803055393-GjDw5VFXIAAHOfp.png
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1887267458379133023
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ryan Wesley Routh and USAID are both strongly tied to discrete American interests, assets, sources and methods in Ukraine.

Who was paying Routh in Ukraine, Afghanistan, etc.?
Is there no connection whatsoever?

Those are a crisp questions that can now, at last, be answered.
|timestamp=10:30 PM · Feb 5, 2025
|media1=ERW-X-post-1887267458379133023-GjDqTatWIAAISte.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-1887267458379133023-GjDq9zdXQAANzgB.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1887271985803055393
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=UFOs & Foreign Aid/NGOs are both broad programs with which to hide Aerospace development and covert operations respectively.

We don't need to be conspiracy theorizing anymore.

We can now simply be conspiracy inquiring.

It takes some getting used to. But we can just...ask.

And if you think that's nuts: then you EXPLAIN this construction worker turned would-be assassin? I'm all ears.

Just another misfit far from home near a war? That's it? 
Let's get that on the record! From officials. Under oath.

I'd love to hear that, because trying to assasinate a once and future president is a HUGE deal. And we don't seem very interested in his oddball story. Why was this guy so '''anti-interesting'''? I find him utterly fascinating. At a minimum.

Such a crazy story! No? I'd pay to watch a documentary.
|timestamp=10:47 PM · Feb 5, 2025
|media1=ERW-X-post-1887271985803055393-GjDvnppWkAA5MYV.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-1887271985803055393-GjDvrwXXAAAwbHL.jpg
}}
|timestamp=10:52 PM · Feb 5, 2025
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1922242777422954949
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A very interesting question is why academics almost uniformly make fun of conspiracy theories…when presented by colleagues at least. 

Los Alamos, Tuskegee, Human Terrain Systems, etc. all involved conspiracy BY ACADEMICS. Some were good. Some bad. Some ambiguous.

But isn’t it odd that conspiracies are a permanent part of human existence, yet trying to study them or theorize about them results in crippling professional penalties?

I am astonished that I have not heard one single physicist call @pmarca a liar for claiming the Biden Whitehouse revealed that entire public subfields of theoretical physics were taken off-line by the government for security reasons, and disappeared or went dark.

Nor have I heard “We have to look into this!”.
Nor have I heard “Wow! That is super interesting.” Just silence.

But what I have heard is academics finding it laughable that others find this is interesting.

The @pmarca claim about physics is thus one of the most '''anti-interesting''' claims I have ever heard. Everyone in physics just seems to intuitively know not to ask about it.

Has anyone seen @michiokaku, @neiltyson, @bgreene etc. commenting on this claim? I haven’t. 

They all just know: Don’t go there girlfriend.
|timestamp=10:49 AM · May 13, 2025
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1927743029252595973
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@codingquark @HeathHimself GU is both the most '''anti-interesting''' theory in history as well as the only theory that cannot be steelmanned.
|timestamp=3:05 PM · May 28, 2025
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1942984516165079361
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was. Or whether he killed himself. Or what the "Client list" was. Because, like you, I don't actually know about any of those things. And I have never claimed that I do.

I am going to tell you with 100% absolute certainty that Epstein is '''"Anti-Interesting"''' to our news desks. No one want to publish a story about how his multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund worked by interviewing a few of those many former eployees that it must have had.

Or by reviewing the fillings it must have made to the Government. Or its trading records. Or by talking to the sell-side coverage it must have had. Or by going through it's records. 

Or that it didn't exist. And he wasn't a Multi-Billion financier. And that someone set him up as a construct at great expense.

The scandal is not investigating. Not publishing, Not doing journalism. Clearly the state has control of our news. 

I don't care where this leads. I believe he was most likely constructed by a *tiny* number of tight lipped psychopaths who set him up to ruin the lives of children in the service of gathering information. And those people...whoever they are...would need to be brought to justice. Whatever the cost. 

I would like to think there isn't a father alive (no matter how flawed) who disagrees with that. And that we need to put ourselves at risk as a group to protect our children from the State, The Press and The Evil co-conspirators. And I don't know who they are. It's terrifying.

I also thing that a number of people who had nothing to do with that but who had deaings with Epstein (e.g. scientists) need to be separated from that aspect of evil and fully exonerated. And those that participated in the Evil with Epstein need to face justice as well. 

Pretending that there is nothing further to see here, and that no one wants this investigated remains preposterous. 

This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads?

{{#widget:YouTube|id=dJNjH4SP6vw}}
|timestamp=4:29 PM · Jul 9, 2025
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1944207557113049481
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I think many of you made a huge mistake about the “Client List”. About “Lolita Express”. About “Pedophile Island.” That is, if the goal was to use Epstein to get justice, and put an end to this abuse of children and civilians by the sickest members of the world’s ICs.

You had fun with memes. And you let an IC sponsored pedophile get away. We were supposed to be pushing the press: 

“Why don’t you ask **any** truly detailed questions about a supposed multi billion dollar FX hedge fund that may not have existed at all?” That was…and is…the first order of business. 

We can’t know exactly what he did, where and when. 

But there is no way to fake this hedge fund. Either he had an enormous fund or he didn’t. We can get all the details if he did. Or push as to why they don’t exist.

I don’t know if he killed himself. I don’t even know if he is dead. I don’t know if there is “the Epstein client list”.

The thing we know best is that he claimed to manage a multibillion dollar fund that ***cannot*** be hidden. Where are its records and employees?????????” Why does the press avoid reporting on this fund like the plague???? It was headquartered at Villard House for Christ sake. Madison Avenue. Who liquidated it? Who worked there? wtf?

This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the world’s largest mega yachts…that somehow isn’t registered or flagged. It leaves no wake. No shipyard built it or serviced it. It has no crew. No harbor master has ever seen it. 

“It’s so quiet that Lockheed asked to study it. It’s said to be made of optically neural superconducting ice crystals that form only from the tears of virgin sea lions cooled to absolute zero so it can’t be seen. He brilliantly purchased a Bugis Prahu Charter that was grandfathered in before the 1609 Mare Liberum was in force so that he alone may sail the seas without ever communicating with other vessels or harbors. It is said that his carbon fiber anchor and chain stretched to the bottom of the Challenger Deep so that he didn’t need to approach the shore for years on end.”

C’mon. 

The key was that he wasn’t a “disgraced financier”. He was a construct fitted with a mysterious poorly drawn backstory. And that construct probably belonged to several Allied nation states:

“He’s so brilliant that he only accepts people who surrender total control of their wealth under power of attorney. He is closed to anyone who doesn’t have 1 Billion dollars minimum. In fact: his investor list is so discreet, and is said to be so secretive and closely guarded that he has only one known client.”

Did you not realize that outside investors are a liability to a cover story or front? Beware any super secretive fund that has a story why they dont want family office or institutional money. This is not the only one btw.

Hence…the exclusivity.

Why was he obsessed by Gravity? He was almost certainly a front used for funding edgy science, information gathering, control, etc away from normal channels. 

It wasn’t one thing. He wasn’t a creepy front company…he was a mall filled with different business providing different goods and services. It wasn’t all about raping kids. Some collection of people invested something like 9 figures in creating a weird 11-12 figure fairy tale via leverage. And it was used for a lot of things. It was called Jeffrey Epstein.

Moral: focus on the cover story. Not the memes. Go after the press first. Figure out exactly who is stopping the fund from being dissected. Focus on the non reporting. 

This is what '''Anti-Interesting''' is all about. Use it.

One man’s opinion. 🙏 

{{#widget:YouTube|id=vjwf9F_v5cI}}
|timestamp=1:29 AM · Jul 13, 2025
}}

==Related Pages==

* [[25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein|The Portal Ep 25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein]]
* [[Anechoic Era or Anechoic media]]
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]]
* [[Follow the Silence]]
* [[Jeffrey Epstein]]
* [[Jessupization]]
* [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)]]
* [[The Invisible World is First Detected by the Visible World’s Failure to Close]]
* [[Nothing Burger]]
* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]]

[[Category:Ericisms]]
[[Category:DISC]]