Editing Honeypot

{{stub}}

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233422752352100354
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421386590220288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Where are we on [[Honeypot|State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots]]?

Let’s try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasn’t behind [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]] if we can’t ask the question of [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein’s]] ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole.
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421390029606912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is that [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]? Wouldn’t we want to be sure that [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein’s]] fortune didn’t come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didn’t and aren’t reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us.
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421391669497856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Pursue this even further: if news desks aren’t asking these questions, aren’t they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they aren’t willing to *ask* Qs?
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233422750229745666
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase “No Comment” is familiar to anyone my age from this time.

Where is that phrase?
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
|timestamp=4:04 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1472434103240716290
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I submit this to you that “This likely is the best explanation of all the improbable things that keep happening which keep us from learning the truth in this case.”

This isn’t remotely tin foil hat territory. This looks like state protection of the '''Sources and Methods''' of the IC.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1472434098429841410
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I have been told that '''“Sources and Methods”''' of the IC must be protected by any means necessary. 

That is likely the most parsimonious explanation for why the [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]] case never resolves. Something seems to happen to everything and everyone who could clear it up.
|timestamp=5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1472434100338192386
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Is this a conspiracy theory?

Well, think about it like this. When the Intelligence Community is doing it’s job properly it’s supposed to generate conspiracies for the public good. So saying the IC is a conspiracy factory isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s part of a job description.
|timestamp=5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1472434101370064900
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Further, we definitely have an “Event Deconfliction” system to make sure that local law enforcement &amp; district attorneys don’t bust &amp; prosecute undercover federal agents, screwing up our secret programs. Events are called “[[Blue on Blue]].”

So that isn’t a conspiracy theory either.
|timestamp=5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1472434102343139328
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Additionally, the use of [[Honeypot|honey traps]], [[Honeypot|honey pots]], and kompromat are all well known as tools of the IC, as is disinformation.

None of that is conspiracy theory either. 

The only thing you can object to as [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing|irresponsible conspiracy theory]] is the assertion that this may apply here.
|timestamp=5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021
}}

== Related Pages ==

* [[Anti-Interesting]]
* [[Blue on Blue]]
* [[Church and Pike Commissions]]
* [[Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue]]
* [[Deconfliction]]
* [[Digital Wetwork]]
* [[Follow the Silence]]
* [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]]
* [[Ghislaine Maxwell]]
* [[Jeffrey Epstein]]
* [[Map the Silences]]
* [[Managed Reality TM]]
* [[Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing]]
* [[Robert Maxwell]]
* [[Seberging]]
* [[Strategic Silence]]
* [[25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein|The Portal Ep 25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein]]
* [[Distributed Idea Suppression Complex]]
* [[Sources and Methods]]

[[Category:Concepts]]