Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 103: |
Line 103: |
| == Chapter 3 Kinds of number in the physical world == | | == Chapter 3 Kinds of number in the physical world == |
|
| |
|
| ===3.1 A Pythagorean catastrophe?=== | | ===3.1 A pythagorean catastrophe?=== |
| We now switch over to the idea of ânumberâ, and the layers of generality that lie beneath integers. The Pythagoreans solved the question, by using proof by contradiction, of attempting to find a rational number (fraction) whose square is precisely 2. There does not exist such a number within the confines are integers and rationals, which was troubling for them at the time since it was desired to have all of geometry be described by these types of physical numbers.
| |
|
| |
| Penrose gives the proof by contradiction for the Pythagorean question above and explains the necessity of identifying the precise assumptions that go into a proof. He explains that there exist other generalities than that was originally used in the proof, whereby these precise assumptions must be used to judge the logic. The Pythagoreans used integers and rationals to explain the existence of the real numbers.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===3.2 The real number system=== | | ===3.2 The real number system=== |